Effect of diastasis shape and size during calcaneal lengthening osteotomy on correction outcomes in different forms of flatfoot: an experimental cadaveric study
- Authors: Kozhevnikov O.V.1, Sosin A.I.1, Rogova M.S.1, Mursalov A.K.1
-
Affiliations:
- N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics
- Issue: Vol 13, No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 398-409
- Section: Experimental and theoretical research
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/turner/article/view/375528
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PTORS687820
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DESOAY
- ID: 375528
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence of flatfoot in children, the development of surgical techniques for its treatment has significantly outpaced their biomechanical justification. Cadaveric studies in traumatology and orthopedics have traditionally served as a primary method for gaining deeper insight into the biomechanics of deformities. Preoperative planning of osteotomy gap parameters remains a relevant issue when correcting various clinical forms of pediatric flatfoot.
AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the shape and size of the osteotomy gap, specifically its angular and linear parameters, on the correction of different clinical forms of flatfoot during calcaneal lengthening osteotomy under controlled conditions (in a cadaveric study).
METHODS: An experimental cadaveric study was conducted using a vertical load simulation device with radiographic control. The study was performed on 8 anatomical specimens of the lower leg and foot. The study consisted of two stages. During the first stage, anatomical specimens were prepared for placement in the vertical load simulation device, followed by radiographic examination under unloaded conditions and a simulated load of 750 N. During the second stage, a cadaveric flatfoot model was created with the possibility of simulating two clinical forms (abducted planovalgus deformity and flatfoot deformity), followed by calcaneal osteotomy and sequential implantation of specially designed implants of various shapes under radiographic control. Radiographic parameters were assessed at each stage of the study, including the Kite angle, talonavicular coverage angle (according to V. Mosca), cuboid abduction angle, longitudinal arch angle, calcaneal inclination angle, and Meary angle.
RESULTS: At the first stage of the study with anatomical specimens, reproducible cadaveric flatfoot models were successfully obtained using the proposed method, allowing the simulation of two clinical forms: abducted planovalgus deformity and flatfoot deformity. At the second stage, calcaneal lengthening osteotomy performed with different implant shapes demonstrated distinct patterns of change in radiographic parameters depending on the clinical form of flatfoot, which reflects differences in correction biomechanics.
CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that the shape of the osteotomy gap, when selected in accordance with the clinical form of flatfoot, may play a key role in restoring the proper foot configuration.
About the authors
Oleg V. Kozhevnikov
N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Email: kozhevnikovov@cito-priorov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3929-6294
SPIN-code: 9538-4058
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, MoscowAnton I. Sosin
N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Author for correspondence.
Email: SosinAI@cito-priorov.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-6399-8603
SPIN-code: 5579-2844
MD
Russian Federation, MoscowMariya S. Rogova
N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Email: m.rogova24@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-7954-503X
SPIN-code: 7472-9278
MD
Russian Federation, MoscowAnatoly K. Mursalov
N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Email: tamerlanmursalov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3829-5524
SPIN-code: 9035-8198
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Evans AM, Rome K. A Cochrane review of the evidence for non-surgical interventions for flexible pediatric flat feet. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011;47(1):69–89.
- Pfeiffer M, Kotz R, Ledl T, et al. Prevalence of flat foot in preschool-aged children. Pediatrics. 2006;118(2):634–639. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2126
- Kenis VM, Lapkin YA, Khusainov RK, et al. Flexible flatfoot in children (review). Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery. 2014;2(2):44–54. doi: 10.17816/PTORS2244-54 EDN: SJFIQD
- Armasov AR, Kiselev VY. Diagnostic value of the technique for feet visual estimation in adolescent platypodia determination. Orthopaedic Genius. 2010;(3):101–104. EDN: MTYNSN
- Evans D. Calcaneo-valgus deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975;57(3):270–278.
- Mosca VS. Calcaneal lengthening for valgus deformity of the hindfoot. Results in children who had severe, symptomatic flatfoot and skewfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(4):500–512. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199504000-00002
- Benthien RA, Parks BG, Guyton GP, et al. Lateral column calcaneal lengthening, flexor digitorum longus transfer, and opening wedge medial cuneiform osteotomy for flexible flatfoot: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(1):70–77. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0013
- Zhou H, Ren H, Li C, et al. Biomechanical analysis of cuboid osteotomy lateral column lengthening for stage II B adult-acquired flatfoot deformity: a cadaveric study. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4383981. doi: 10.1155/2017/4383981
- Shabaldin NA, Shabaldin AV, Titov FV, et al. Comparative analysis of foot position in children using the foot posture index (FPI-6) with symptomatic and asymptomatic forms of flatfoot. Fundamental and Clinical Medicine. 2020;5(4):76–83. doi: 10.23946/2500-0764-2020-5-4-76-83 EDN: FZCURE
- Sangeorzan BJ, Mosca V, Hansen ST Jr. Effect of calcaneal lengthening on relationships among the hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot. Foot Ankle. 1993;14(3):136–141. doi: 10.1177/107110079301400305
- Fischer KM, Willwacher S, Arndt A, et al. Calcaneal adduction and eversion are coupled to talus and tibial rotation. J Anat. 2018;233(1):64–72. doi: 10.1111/joa.12813
- Gentili A, Masih S, Yao L, et al. Pictorial review: foot axes and angles. Br J Radiol. 1996;69(826):968–974. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-826-968
- Xia J, Zhang P, Yang YF, et al. Biomechanical analysis of the calcaneocuboid joint pressure after sequential lengthening of the lateral column. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(2):261–266. doi: 10.1177/1071100712464211
- Deland JT, Arnoczky SP, Thompson FM. Adult acquired flatfoot deformity at the talonavicular joint: reconstruction of the spring ligament in an in vitro model. Foot Ankle. 1992;13(6):327–332. doi: 10.1177/107110079201300606
- Huang CK, Kitaoka HB, An KN, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of longitudinal arch stability. Foot Ankle. 1993;14(6):353–357. doi: 10.1177/107110079301400609
Supplementary files

