Effect of diastasis shape and size during calcaneal lengthening osteotomy on correction outcomes in different forms of flatfoot: an experimental cadaveric study

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence of flatfoot in children, the development of surgical techniques for its treatment has significantly outpaced their biomechanical justification. Cadaveric studies in traumatology and orthopedics have traditionally served as a primary method for gaining deeper insight into the biomechanics of deformities. Preoperative planning of osteotomy gap parameters remains a relevant issue when correcting various clinical forms of pediatric flatfoot.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the shape and size of the osteotomy gap, specifically its angular and linear parameters, on the correction of different clinical forms of flatfoot during calcaneal lengthening osteotomy under controlled conditions (in a cadaveric study).

METHODS: An experimental cadaveric study was conducted using a vertical load simulation device with radiographic control. The study was performed on 8 anatomical specimens of the lower leg and foot. The study consisted of two stages. During the first stage, anatomical specimens were prepared for placement in the vertical load simulation device, followed by radiographic examination under unloaded conditions and a simulated load of 750 N. During the second stage, a cadaveric flatfoot model was created with the possibility of simulating two clinical forms (abducted planovalgus deformity and flatfoot deformity), followed by calcaneal osteotomy and sequential implantation of specially designed implants of various shapes under radiographic control. Radiographic parameters were assessed at each stage of the study, including the Kite angle, talonavicular coverage angle (according to V. Mosca), cuboid abduction angle, longitudinal arch angle, calcaneal inclination angle, and Meary angle.

RESULTS: At the first stage of the study with anatomical specimens, reproducible cadaveric flatfoot models were successfully obtained using the proposed method, allowing the simulation of two clinical forms: abducted planovalgus deformity and flatfoot deformity. At the second stage, calcaneal lengthening osteotomy performed with different implant shapes demonstrated distinct patterns of change in radiographic parameters depending on the clinical form of flatfoot, which reflects differences in correction biomechanics.

CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that the shape of the osteotomy gap, when selected in accordance with the clinical form of flatfoot, may play a key role in restoring the proper foot configuration.

About the authors

Oleg V. Kozhevnikov

N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: kozhevnikovov@cito-priorov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3929-6294
SPIN-code: 9538-4058

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anton I. Sosin

N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Author for correspondence.
Email: SosinAI@cito-priorov.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-6399-8603
SPIN-code: 5579-2844

MD

Russian Federation, Moscow

Mariya S. Rogova

N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: m.rogova24@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-7954-503X
SPIN-code: 7472-9278

MD

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anatoly K. Mursalov

N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: tamerlanmursalov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3829-5524
SPIN-code: 9035-8198

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Evans AM, Rome K. A Cochrane review of the evidence for non-surgical interventions for flexible pediatric flat feet. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011;47(1):69–89.
  2. Pfeiffer M, Kotz R, Ledl T, et al. Prevalence of flat foot in preschool-aged children. Pediatrics. 2006;118(2):634–639. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2126
  3. Kenis VM, Lapkin YA, Khusainov RK, et al. Flexible flatfoot in children (review). Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery. 2014;2(2):44–54. doi: 10.17816/PTORS2244-54 EDN: SJFIQD
  4. Armasov AR, Kiselev VY. Diagnostic value of the technique for feet visual estimation in adolescent platypodia determination. Orthopaedic Genius. 2010;(3):101–104. EDN: MTYNSN
  5. Evans D. Calcaneo-valgus deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975;57(3):270–278.
  6. Mosca VS. Calcaneal lengthening for valgus deformity of the hindfoot. Results in children who had severe, symptomatic flatfoot and skewfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(4):500–512. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199504000-00002
  7. Benthien RA, Parks BG, Guyton GP, et al. Lateral column calcaneal lengthening, flexor digitorum longus transfer, and opening wedge medial cuneiform osteotomy for flexible flatfoot: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(1):70–77. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0013
  8. Zhou H, Ren H, Li C, et al. Biomechanical analysis of cuboid osteotomy lateral column lengthening for stage II B adult-acquired flatfoot deformity: a cadaveric study. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4383981. doi: 10.1155/2017/4383981
  9. Shabaldin NA, Shabaldin AV, Titov FV, et al. Comparative analysis of foot position in children using the foot posture index (FPI-6) with symptomatic and asymptomatic forms of flatfoot. Fundamental and Clinical Medicine. 2020;5(4):76–83. doi: 10.23946/2500-0764-2020-5-4-76-83 EDN: FZCURE
  10. Sangeorzan BJ, Mosca V, Hansen ST Jr. Effect of calcaneal lengthening on relationships among the hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot. Foot Ankle. 1993;14(3):136–141. doi: 10.1177/107110079301400305
  11. Fischer KM, Willwacher S, Arndt A, et al. Calcaneal adduction and eversion are coupled to talus and tibial rotation. J Anat. 2018;233(1):64–72. doi: 10.1111/joa.12813
  12. Gentili A, Masih S, Yao L, et al. Pictorial review: foot axes and angles. Br J Radiol. 1996;69(826):968–974. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-826-968
  13. Xia J, Zhang P, Yang YF, et al. Biomechanical analysis of the calcaneocuboid joint pressure after sequential lengthening of the lateral column. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(2):261–266. doi: 10.1177/1071100712464211
  14. Deland JT, Arnoczky SP, Thompson FM. Adult acquired flatfoot deformity at the talonavicular joint: reconstruction of the spring ligament in an in vitro model. Foot Ankle. 1992;13(6):327–332. doi: 10.1177/107110079201300606
  15. Huang CK, Kitaoka HB, An KN, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of longitudinal arch stability. Foot Ankle. 1993;14(6):353–357. doi: 10.1177/107110079301400609

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Эко-Вектор

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
 


Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).