COVID-19: Political challenges for public health

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has become not only an epidemiological and medical problem but also a challenge for all systems of society, a test for political institutions. The real threats to public health and the enormous pressure on public health systems have shaped the unprecedented coercive measures to limit mobility and social exclusion that governments have adopted to control the situation. The effectiveness of political institutions in the implementation of anti-epidemiological measures was different. The review considers interdisciplinary approaches to analy-zing a systemic crisis in a pandemic, which has revealed a close relationship between social and economic equality, health equity and population health. The disproportionately high correlation of mortality from new infection with structural inequality at the intersection of status, class, racial/ethnic minority, and profession is shown. The problems of politicization of the pandemic and social polarization, the influence of confidence in the state, the health care system, and healthcare professionals on compliance with recommended behaviors by various social groups are considered. The speed with which new scientific information is generated during a pandemic and the need for a quick response enhance the likelihood of misinformation appearing in the information environment. The article shows the danger of infodemic for the unity of society against the backdrop of the growing role of the media and social networks in supporting the population. Approaches to the problem of vaccine mistrust are examined, the need to develop a policy of equitable distribution of vaccines, educate the population to increase adherence to vaccination is shown. A post-coronavirus strategy for the development of public health has been proposed, which includes increasing investment in health systems, overcoming health inequities, caring for healthcare professionals, and developing biomedical science.

About the authors

L M Mukharyamova

Kazan State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: l.mukharyamova@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Kazan, Russia

A R Zalyaev

Kazan State Medical University

Email: l.mukharyamova@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Kazan, Russia

E Yu Shammazova

Kazan State Medical University

Email: l.mukharyamova@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Kazan, Russia

References

  1. Horton R. The COVID-19 catastrophe: What's gone wrong and how to stop it happening again. USA: John Wiley & Sons. 2020; 140 р.
  2. Capano G., Goyal N., Howlett M. et al. Mobili­zing policy (in) capacity to fight COVID-19: Understan­ding variations in state responses. Policy and Society. 2020; 39 (3): 285–308. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1787628.
  3. Poole D.N., Gostin L.O., Escudero D.J. et al. Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic in complex humanitarian crises. Intern. J. Equity in Health. 2020; 19 (1): 1–2. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01162-y.
  4. Daoudi S. The war on COVID-19: The 9/11 of health security? Policy Paper. Policy Center for the New South. 2020; 15 р.
  5. Bezuglaya N.S., Shamray I.N. National security and coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: Challenges to the economic system of the state and prospects for ensuring its security. Regionologiya. 2020; 28 (3): 449–469. (In Russ.) doi: 10.15507/2413-1407.112.028.202003.449-469.
  6. Van Barneveld K., Quinlan М., Kriesler P. et al. The COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons on building more equal and sustainable societies. Economic and Labour Relat. Rev. 2020; 31 (2): 133–157. doi: 10.1177/1035304620927107.
  7. Saad F.A. Neoliberalism and the COVID-19 pande­mic: a political economic analysis. Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2020; 223 (3): 565–572. (In Russ.) doi: 10.38197/2072-2060-2020-223-3-565-572.
  8. Davydov V.O. Pandemic speculation: how criminals exploit the COVID-19 crisis (based on a report by executive director Europol C. de Bolle “Pandemic profiteering: how criminals exploit the COVID-19 crisis”). Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. 2020; (2): 19–25. (In Russ.)
  9. Kornienko A.V. Cartel agreements in the Russian Federation in the context of a pandemic. Voprosy rossiyskoy yustitsii. 2020; (7): 173–181. (In Russ.)
  10. Elgar F.J., Stefaniak A., Wohl M.J.A. The ­trouble with trust: Time-series analysis of social capital, income inequality, and COVID-19 deaths in 84 countries. Soc. Sci. Med. 2020; 263: 113365. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113365.
  11. Schwalbe N., Lehtimaki S., Gutiérrez J.P. COVID-19: rethinking risk. The Lancet Global Health. 2020; 8 (8): 974–975. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30276-X.
  12. Ahmed F., Na’eem A., Pissarides C., Stiglitz J. Why inequality could spread COVID-19. The Lancet Public Health. 2020; 5 (5): 240. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30085-2.
  13. Bowleg L. We're not all in this together: On COVID-19, intersectionality, and structural inequality. Am. J. Public Health. 2020; 110 (7): 917. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305766.
  14. Gu T., Mack J.A., Salvatore M. et al. Characteristics associated with racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 outcomes in an Academic Health Care System. JAMA Netw. Open. 2020; 3 (10): e2025197. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25197.
  15. Hatef E., Chang H.Y., Kitchen C. et al. Asses­sing the impact of neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics on COVID-19 prevalence across seven states in the Uni­ted States. Front. Public Health. 2020; 8: 571808. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.571808.
  16. Oberndorfer M., Dorner T., Brunnmayr M. et al. Equally affected? Health-related and socioeconomic adversities of the COVID-19 pandemic in Vienna. 2020, September 15. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3733369.
  17. Morabia A. COVID-19: Health as a common good. Am. J. Public Health. 2020; 110 (8): 1111–1112. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305802.
  18. Greer S.L., King E.J., da Fonseca E.M., Peralta-Santos A. The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses. Global Public Health. 2020; 15 (9): 1413–1416. doi: 10.1080/17441692.
  19. Maor M., Sulitzeanu-Kenan R., Chinitz D. When COVID-19, constitutional crisis, and political deadlock meet: the Israeli case from a disproportionate policy perspective. Policy and Society. 2020; 39 (3): 442–457. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1783792.
  20. Prasad A. The organization of ideological discourse in times of unexpected crisis: Explaining how COVID-19 is exploited by populist leaders. Leadership. 2020; 16 (3): 294–302. doi: 10.1177/1742715020926783.
  21. Leo G. Social and political consequences of the pandemia on conceptualisation of eco­nomies in the West. Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2020; 223 (3): 573–576. (In Russ.) doi: 10.38197/2072-2060-2020-223-3-573-576.
  22. Kavanagh M.M., Singh R. Democracy, capacity, and coercion in pandemic response: COVID-19 in comparative political perspective. J. Health Politics, Policy and Law. 2020; 45 (6): 997–1012. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8641530.
  23. Ezeibe C.C., Ilo C., Ezeibe E.N. et al. Political distrust and the spread of COVID-19 in Nigeria. Global Public Health. 2020; 12: 1753–1766. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1828987.
  24. Guglielmi S., Dotti Sani G.M., Molteni F. et al. Public acceptability of containment measures during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: how institutional confidence and specific political support matter. Intern. J. Sociol. Social Policy. 2020; (9/10): 1069–1085. doi: 10.1108/IJSSP-07-2020-0342.
  25. Pierre J. Nudges against pandemics: Sweden’s COVID-19 containment strategy in perspective. Policy and Society. 2020; 39 (3): 478–493. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1783787.
  26. Barbieri P., Bonini B.; Social Science Research Network. Populism and political (mis-)belief effect on indivi­dual adherence to lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. 2020; 24 р. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3640324.
  27. Hart P.S., Chinn S., Soroka S. Politicization and polarization in COVID-19 news coverage. Sci. Commun. 2020; 42 (5): 679–697. doi: 10.1177/1075547020950735.
  28. Levendusky M., Ryan J., Druckman J.N. et al. Replication data for: “Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America”. Harvard Dataverse. 2020; doi: 10.7910/DVN/H7AT3N.
  29. Barrios J.M., Hochberg Y. Risk perception through the lens of politics in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics. 2020; Working Paper No. 2020-32. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3568766.
  30. Tejedor S., Cervi L., Tusa F. et al. Information on the COVID-19 pandemic in Daily Newspapers’ Front ­Pages: Case study of Spain and Italy. Intern. J. Environmental Res. Public Health. 2020; 17 (17): 6330. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176330.
  31. Jiun-Yi Tsai, Joe Phua, Shuya Pan, Chia-chen Yang. Intergroup contact, COVID-19 news consumption, and the moderating role of digital media trust on prejudice toward Asians in the United States: Cross-sectional study. J. Med. Intern. Res. 2020; 22 (9): 22767. doi: 10.2196/22767.
  32. Pahayahay A., Khalili-Mahani N. What media helps, what media hurts: A mixed methods survey study of coping with COVID-19 using the media repertoire framework and the appraisal theory of stress. J. Med. Intern. Res. 2020; 22 (8): 20186. doi: 10.2196/20186.
  33. Rao H.R., Vemprala N., Akello P., Valecha R. Retweets of officials’ alarming vs reassuring ­messages during the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for crisis management. Intern. J. Inform. Manag. 2020; 55: 102187. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102187.
  34. WHO is working with the Go­vernment of the United Kingdom to raise awareness about the dangers of spreading inaccurate and misleading information about the coronavirus pandemic. https://www.who.int/ru/campaigns/connecting-the-world-to-combat-coronavirus/how-to-report-misinformation-online (access date: 20.08.2020). (In Russ.)
  35. Brennen J.S., Simon F.M., Nielsen R.K. “Covid19” beyond (mis) representation: Visuals in COVID-19 misinformation. Intern. J. Press/Politics. 2021; 26 (1): 277–299. doi: 10.1177/1940161220964780.
  36. Ten threats to global health in 2019. https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019 (access date: 20.08.2020). (In Russ.)
  37. Dror A.A., Eisenbach N., Taiber S. et al. Vaccine hesitancy: the next challenge in the fight against COVID-19. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2020; 35: 775–779. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00671-y.
  38. Blasi F., liberti S., Mantero M., Centanni S. Compliance with anti‐H1N1 vaccine among healthcare workers and general population. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012; 18: 37–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03941.x.
  39. Neumann-Böhme S., Varghese N.E., Sabat I. et al. Once we have it, will we use it? A European survey on willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Eur. J. Health Econ. 2020; 21: 977–982. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01208-6.
  40. Kata A. Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm — An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine. 2012; 30 (25): 3778–3789. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112.
  41. Verger P., Dubé E. Restoring confidence in vaccines in the COVID-19 era. Expert Rev. Vaccines. 2020; 19 (11): 991–993. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2020.1825945.
  42. Taylor S., Landry C.A., Paluszek M.M. et al. A proactive approach for managing COVID-19: The importance of understanding the motivational roots of vaccination hesi­tancy for SARS-CoV2. Front. Psychol. 2020; 11: 2890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575950.
  43. Peretti-Watel P., Seror V., Cortaredona S. et al. A future vaccination campaign against COVID-19 at risk of vaccine hesitancy and politicisation. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020; 20 (7): 769–770. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30426-6.
  44. Phelan A.L., Eccleston-Turner M., Rourke M. et al. Legal agreements: barriers and enablers to global equi­table COVID-19 vaccine access. Lancet. 2020; 396 (10254): 800–802. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31873-0.
  45. Liu Y., Salwi S., Drolet B.C. Multivalue ethical framework for fair global allocation of a COVID-19 vaccine. J. Med. Ethics. 2020; 46: 499–501. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106516.
  46. Nezhmetdinova F.T., Guryleva M.E. Medical, social and ethical issues related to COVID-19. Kazan Medical ­Journal. 2020; 101 (6): 841–851. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/KMJ2020-841.
  47. Kanupriya. COVID-19: A Socio-economic Perspective. FIIB Business Review. 2020; 9 (3): 161–166. doi: 10.1177/2319714520923918.
  48. Perkhov V.I., Gridnev O.V. COVID-19 pandemic lessons for policy in the field of public health. Sovremennye problemy zdravookhrane­niya i meditsinskoy statistiki. 2020; (2): 206–221. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24411/2312-2935-2020-00043.

© 2021 Mukharyamova L.M., Zalyaev A.R., Shammazova E.Y.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed
under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies