Results of the surgical treatment of intra-articular fractures of the distal femur using a retrograde intramedullary technique

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background: Distal femoral fractures are a widely spread problem in traumatology, which can be caused by both a high-energy trauma and a low-energy trauma in senile patients with osteoporosis. The conservative treatment shows little promise. The surgical treatment of patients is still a challenge for orthopedic surgeons regarding both the technical aspect and a high risk of complications. There are several surgical methods with the use of plates and nails, but there is still no universal conception of the surgical treatment.

Aim: comparative analysis of methods of intramedullary retrograde osteosynthesis and bone osteosynthesis in the treatment of fractures of the distal femur.

Methods: In this study, we evaluated the treatment results of 46 patients who underwent osteosynthesis for intraarticular fractures of the distal femur using an intramedullary retrograde nail. The evaluation was carried out based on such parameters as the duration of the operation and the time from the moment of injury to the operation, the intraoperative blood loss and the function of the knee joint. On average, the operation time using a retrograde femoral nail was 45 minutes. Reducing the duration of the operation improved the functional results of the treatment. Reducing the operation time when installing a retrograde intramedullary nail was achieved with a relatively simple technique for installing this type of a fixator and the use of minimally invasive approaches.

Results: On average, the operation time using a retrograde femoral nail was 45 minutes. Reducing the duration of the operation improved the functional results of treatment. Reducing the operation time when installing a retrograde intramedullary nail was due to a relatively simple technique for installing this type of fixator and the use of minimally invasive approaches. One year after the surgery, the following mean values were achieved: 78 (64–85) points according to the KSS knee score, 85 (68–89) points according to the KSS function score, 3.1 (1.3–4.2) cm for the severity of pain syndrome according to the VAS scale, 105 (88–120) degrees for the flexion in the knee joint. However, a number of post-op complications were observed: deep vein thrombosis of lower extremities was found in 6 (13.1%) patients, formation of a false-joint was seen in 3 (6.5%) patients, 1st grade arthritis of the knee joint was detected in 36 patients (78.2%), 2nd grade arthritis was observed in 10 patients (21.8%). 3rd grade arthritis was not detected. 3.5 years after the operation, none of the patients needed a knee joint replacement.

Conclusion: Retrograde intramedullary osteosynthesis in type C distal femoral fractures promotes early rehabilitation, a complete recovery of the knee joint function and healing of the fracture, and represents an effective method of treatment.

About the authors

Temirlan M. Aliev

Moscow City Clinical Hospital in honor of V.M. Buyanov; Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Email: atm.travma@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9280-3449
Russian Federation, Moscow; 6, Miklukho-Maklaya street, Moscow, 117198

Nikolai V. Zagorodniy

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Email: zagorodniy51@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6736-9772
SPIN-code: 6889-8166

MD, PhD, Corresponding Member of the RAS

Russian Federation, 6, Miklukho-Maklaya street, Moscow, 117198

Aleksey P. Prizov

Moscow City Clinical Hospital in honor of V.M. Buyanov; Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Email: aprizov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3092-9753
SPIN-code: 6979-6480

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, Moscow; 6, Miklukho-Maklaya street, Moscow, 117198

Fedor L. Lazko

Moscow City Clinical Hospital in honor of V.M. Buyanov; Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Email: fedor_lazko@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5292-7930
SPIN-code: 8504-7290

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, Moscow; 6, Miklukho-Maklaya street, Moscow, 117198

Alexander A. Akhpashev

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Medical Assistance and Medical Technologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency

Email: akhpashev@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2938-5173
SPIN-code: 9965-1828

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, Moscow

Evgeniy A. Belyak

Moscow City Clinical Hospital in honor of V.M. Buyanov; Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: belyakevgen@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2542-8308
SPIN-code: 7337-1214

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, Moscow; 6, Miklukho-Maklaya street, Moscow, 117198

References

  1. Соколов В.А., Бялик Е.И., Такиев А.Т., и др. Оперативное лечение переломов дистального отдела бедра у пострадавших с сочетанной и множественной травмой // Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова. 2004. Т. 11, № 1. С. 20–26. [Sokolov VA, Byalik EI, Takiev AT, et al. Surgical treatment of distal femur fractures in patients with concomitant and multiple injury. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2004;11(1):20–26. (In Russ).] doi: 10.17816/vto200411120-26
  2. Панков И.О., Рябчиков И.В., Емелин А.Л. Чрескостный остеосинтез при лечении внутрисуставных переломов области коленного сустава // Практическая медицина. 2017. № 7. С. 89–93. [Pankov IO, Ryabchikov IV, Emelin AL. Transosseous osteosynthesis in the treatment of intra-articular fractures of the knee joint area. Practical medicine. 2017;(7):89–93. (In Russ).]
  3. Сергеев С.В., Чибриков А.Г., Гришанин О.Б., Матвеев В.С. Ретроградный блокирующий интрамедуллярный остеосинтез при переломах бедренной кости // Вестник ортопедии, травматологии и протезирования. 2017. № 3. С. 19–23. [Sergeev SV, Chibrikov AG, Grishanin OB, Matveev VS. Retrograde blocking intramedullary osteosynthesis in femoral fractures. Bulletin of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Prosthetics. 2017;(3):19–23. (In Russ).]
  4. Черняев С.Н., Неверов В.А., Хромов А.А., и др. Применение блокирующего остеосинтеза при метафизарных переломах бедренной кости // Вестник хирургии им. И.И. Грекова. 2018. Т. 167, № 6. С. 55–58. [Chernyaev SN, Neverov VA, Khromov AA, et al. The use of blocking osteosynthesis in metaphysical femoral fractures. Bulletin of Surgery named after I.I. Grekov. 2018;167(6):55–58. (In Russ).]
  5. Harder Y, Martinet O, Barraud GE, et al. The mechanics of internal fixation of fractures of the distal femur: A comparison of the condylar screw (DCS) with the condylar plate (CP). Injury. 2017;30(1):31–39. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(99)00124-2
  6. Ito K, Grass R, Zwipp H. Internal fixation of supracondylar femoral fractures: Comparative biomechanical performance of the 958 plate and two retrograde nails. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;4:259–266. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199805000-00008
  7. Iannacone WM, Bennet FS, Delong WG, et al. Initial experience with the treatment of supracondylar femoral fractures using the supracondylar nail: A preliminary report. J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8(4):322–327. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199408000-00008
  8. Crist DB, Della Rocca JG, Murtha MY. Treatment of acute distal femur fractures. Orthopedics. 2008;31(7):681–690. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20110505-08
  9. Başcı O, Karakaşlı A, Kumtepe E, et al. Combination of anatomical locking plate and retrograde intramedullary nail in distal femoral fractures: Comparison of mechanical stability. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2015;26(1):21–26. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2015.06
  10. Meccariello L, Bisaccia M, Ronga M, et al. Locking retrograde nail, non-locking retrograde nail and plate fixation in the treatment of distal third femoral shaft fractures: Radiographic, bone densitometry and clinical outcomes. J Orthop Traumatol. 2021;22(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s10195-021-00593-9
  11. Garala K, Ramoutar D, Li J, et al. Distal femoral fractures: A comparison between single lateral plate fixation and a combined femoral nail and plate fixation. Injury. 2022;53(2): 634–639. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.11.011

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. C-type fractures according to the AO classification (Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur osteosynthesenfragen): а — Grafik; C-type fractures according to AO classification: б — simple intraarticular, simple metaphyseal; в — simple intraarticular, complex metaphyseal; г — comminuted intraarticular.

Download (1MB)
3. Fig. 2. Determining the implant size with use of a template (а, б).

Download (1MB)
4. Fig. 3. Positioning a patient on the table.

Download (1MB)
5. Fig. 4. Stages of fixation of the femoral condyles fracture with cannulated screws (а, б).

Download (1MB)
6. Fig. 5. Approach when applying the retrograde technique.

Download (1MB)
7. Fig. 6. The point of the guiding wire entry in the lateral view superior to the Blumensaat line.

Download (1MB)
8. Fig. 7. Radiographs of the 62-year-old patients with a diagnosis of a closed comminuted fracture of the distal right of femoral bone before (а) and after the surgery (б–д).

Download (1MB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies