Specifics of follow-up observation regarding one disease
- Authors: Sandakov Y.P.1
-
Affiliations:
- Diagnostic Center № 3 of Moscow Healthcare Department
- Issue: Vol 35, No 3 (2018)
- Pages: 58-66
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/PMJ/article/view/9177
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/pmj35358-66
- ID: 9177
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Aim. To study the specifics of addressing for medical care among patients under follow-up observation, regarding one disease.
Materials and methods. The data, obtained from copies of medical records of 402 ambulatory patients under follow-up observation for one disease, were analyzed, using the methods of descriptive and inductive statistics.
Results. The studied group included 60 % of women and 77.5 % of pensioners. There were more able-bodied men, than able-bodied women (φ*emp = 3.242, р ˂ 0.001). Patients’ mean age was 68.3 ± 16.4 years. In 81 % of cases, the cause of follow-up observation were cardiovascular diseases. A mean duration of disease for the main disease was 10.5 ± 6.4 years, duration of follow-up – 6.4 ± 2.6 years (t = 10.0, p < 0.001). A mean number of planned visits to a doctor was 2.0 ± 0.34, real – 1.8 ± 0.5 (t = 5.5, p < 0.001). Frequency of real visits to a doctor does not depend on age (χ2 = –0.04, р = 0.6), gender (t = 0.3, p = 0.8), duration of disease (χ2 = 0.02, р = 0.8), duration of follow-up (χ2 = –0.04, р = 0.6), associated diseases (χ2 = 0.02, р = 0.1). Exacerbations were registered in 87.5 % of patients, disability – 43.5 %, emergency calls – 28.5 %, hospitalizations – 28.5 %, including urgent ones – 35.7 %.
Conclusions. The able-bodied men form the risk group for the development of noninfectious chronic diseases; follow-up quality is unsatisfactory; great influence of associated diseases on medical aid appealability; regularity of asking for medical care is higher among persons, who had two planned visits a year; patients’ loyalty to treatment depends on patient’s psychological characteristic; follow-up, conducted by narrow specialists, is not more effective, than that by therapeutists.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Ya. P. Sandakov
Diagnostic Center № 3 of Moscow Healthcare Department
Author for correspondence.
Email: Sand_2004@mail.ru
кандидат медицинских наук, заместитель главного врача по медицинской части
Russian Federation, 9, Sormovskaya str., Moscow, 109444References
- Диспансерное наблюдение больных хроническими неинфекционными заболеваниями и пациентов с высоким риском их развития: метод. рекомендации. Под ред. С.А. Бойцова, А.Г. Чучалина. М.: РОПИЗ 2014; 112.
- Кочубей А.В., Ластовецкий А.Г., Цветкова Е.А. Особенности нормативного правового регулирования организации профилактической помощи при реализации программ государственных гарантий оказания бесплатной медицинской помощи. Вестник Росздравнадзора 2015; 3: 64-66.
- Об утверждении статистического инструментария для организации Министерством здравоохранения Российской Федерации федерального статистического наблюдения в сфере охраны здоровья: Приказ Росстата от 21.07.2016 № 355, available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_202418/
- Об утверждении Положения об организации оказания первичной медико-санитарной помощи взрослому населению: Приказ Минздравсоцразвития России от 15.05.2012 № 543н, available at: http:// mpmo.ru/content/2012/07/ %E2 %84 %96543 %D0 %BD- %D0 %BE %D1 %82-15- %D0 %BC %D0 %B0 %D1 %8F-2012- %D0 %B3.pdf
- Сабгайда Т.П., Землянова Е.В. Преждевременная смертность и факторы риска как индикаторы программ снижения смертности в России. Социальные аспекты здоровья населения. 2017; 3 (55): 1-25.
Supplementary files
