Retrospective analysis of events of death at home among patients under follow-up observation

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. To study the peculiarities of asking for medical care by patients from among those dead at home, who had been under follow-up observation.

Materials and methods. The data, received from ambulatory medical records of 100 dead at home patients with follow-up, were analyzed using the methods of descriptive and inductive statistics.

Results. A mean age of death was 74.9 ± 13.4 years, men – 65.8 ± 14.1 years, women – 79.2 ± 10.9 years. Cardiovascular diseases were the cause of follow-up observation in 78 % of cases and the cause of death in 85 %; in 30 % of patients the disease was detected while carrying out prophylactic medical examination. A mean duration of disease by the moment of death was 13.0 ± 8.0 years, among pensioners 13.7 ± 8.5 years, in able-bodied  persons 9.6 ± 4.3 years. A mean duration of follow-up observation was 9.2 ± 5.8 years. An average number of planned visits was 2.8 ± 0.89, but the number of real visits during the last year of follow-up observation was 2.4 ± 1.2. Disability was registered in 77.6 % of patients, concomitant diseases – in all patients. For the last year, exacerbations were recorded in 92 % of patients, emergency calls – in 80 %, hospitalization events – 52 %, including 55.8 % – urgent ones.

Conclusions. The absence of significant difference regarding the duration of disease between pensioners and able-bodied patients (т = 0.16, р = 1.43) as well as the absence of correlation between the age and duration of disease (χ2 = 0.19, p = 0.2) indirectly prove the influence of duration of disease on its outcome, but not the age. Attendance, characterizing clinical loyalty to treatment, does not depend on age (χ2 = –0.19,  р = 0.18), sex (т = 1.0, р = 0.32), way of detecting disease (f = 0.9, p = 0.4), class of main disease (f = 0.91,  p = 0.44), duration of disease (χ2 = –0.13, р = 0.49), exacerbations (χ2 = –0.17, р = 0.24), concomitant diseases (χ2 = 0.006, р = 0.9). The number of emergency calls, hospitalizations, urgent hospitalizations does not depend on duration of follow-up observation, regularity and number of real visits to a doctor (p > 0.05) that indicates unsatisfactory quality of follow-up observation.

About the authors

Ya. P. Sandakov

Diagnostic Center № 3 of Moscow Healthcare Department

Author for correspondence.
Email: Sand_2004@mail.ru

кандидат медицинских наук, заместитель главного врача по медицинской части

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Гадаборшев М.И., Левкович М.М., Рудлицкая Н.В. Организация оценки эффективности первичной медицинской помощи. М.: ИНФРА-М 2013; 424.
  2. Гасанова А.З. Медико-организацион ные и социально-экономические аспекты диспансеризации работающего городского населения: автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. М. 2012; 26.
  3. Диспансерное наблюдение больных хроническими неинфекционными заболеваниями и пациентов с высоким риском их развития: метод. рекомендации. Под ред. С.А. Бойцова и А.Г. Чучалина. М.: РОПИЗ 2014; 112.
  4. Королева Т.А. Научное обоснование совершенствования поликлинического диспансерного учета хронических неинфекционных заболеваний у лиц трудоспособного возраста: автореф. дис. ... канд. мед. наук. М. 2010; 24.
  5. Кочубей А.В., Ластовецкий А.Г., Цветкова Е.А. Особенности нормативного правового регулирования организации профилактической помощи при реализации программ государственных гарантий оказания бесплатной медицинской помощи. Вестник Росздравнадзора 2015; 3: 64–66.
  6. Овод А.И., Солянина В.А. Результаты исследования обращаемости женщин трудоспособного возраста за профилактической помощью. Возраст-ассоциированные и гендерные особенности здоровья и болезни: сб. материалов междунар. науч.-практ. конф. Курский гос. мед. ун-т. Курск 2016; 244–253.
  7. Стародубов В.И., Калининская А.А., Сон И.М., Щепин В.О. Первичная медико-санитарная помощь: механизмы совершенствования. Вена: East West Association for Advanced Studies and Higher Education GmbH 2016; 118.
  8. Linn A.J., Vervloet M., van Dijk L., Smit E.G., Van Weert J.M. Effects of health interventions on medication adherence: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13(4), available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/PMC3278089
  9. Viswanathan M., Golin C., Jones C., Ashok M., Blalock S., Wines R. et al. Interventions to improve adherence to self-administered medications for chronic diseases in the United States: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157 (11): 785–795.

Copyright (c) 2018 Sandakov Y.P.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies