Email this article 
Post a Comment Enterolithiasis
- Authors: Davidov M.I.1, Nikonova O.E.1
-
Affiliations:
- E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 37, No 3 (2020)
- Pages: 5-11
- Section: Original studies
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/PMJ/article/view/44239
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/pmj3735-11
- ID: 44239
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Objective. To study the prevalence, etiopathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of enterolithiasis.
Materials and methods. For 26 years, 30 patients (16 men, 14 women) with intestinal calculi were observed. Elderly and senile patients prevailed (18 persons). Six patients had enterolites, 24 – coprolites. In general, 41 calculi measuring from 2.5 to 22 cm (31 concrement was 6 cm and larger) were diagnosed in patients. Calculi were most often formed in the sigmoid and rectum. Fibrocolonoscopy, proctosigmoidoscopy, ultrasound, computed tomography were used.
Results. It was established that chronic colonic stasis, congenital and acquired intestinal diseases, intake of indigestible and extraneous for the intestine substances (chalk, barium, magnesium and aluminum salts) played a leading role in the formation of intestinal calculi. In 25 patients, calculi caused complications, of which the most severe were perforation of the intestine and acute intestinal obstruction.
Conclusions. Improvement of diagnostics and the developed differentiated treatment tactics permitted to improve treatment results better and achieve recovery in all 30 patients.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
M. I. Davidov
E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: midavidov@mail.ru
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Faculty Surgery
with Course of Urology
O. E. Nikonova
E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University
Email: midavidov@mail.ru
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Lecturer, Department of Faculty Surgery with Course of Urology
Russian Federation, PermReferences
- Davidov M.I. Giant coprolite complicated by acute urinary retention, hydronephrosis, and acute obstructive pyelonephritis. Urologija 2016; 2: 109–11 (in Russian).
- Moiseev V.S., Varshavskij V.A., Shavarov A.A., Reshetin V.V., Petrov A.A. Urate giant tumorous formation with multiple uric acid clusters in the intestinal wall. Ter. arhiv 2014; 86 (12): 22–25 (in Russian).
- Garisto I.D., Campillo L., Edwards E., Harbour M., Ermocilla R. Giant fecaloma in a 12-year-old-boy: a case report. Cases Journal 2009; 2: 127–128.
- Ha Y.Y., Hye W.P., Seong H.Ch., Sun H.B. Ileal Fecaloma Presenting with Small Bowel Obstruction. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Nutr 2015; 18 (3): 193–196.
- Rajagoral A., Martin J. Giant Fecaloma with idiopathic sigmoid megacolon: raport of a case and review of the literature. Diseases Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 833–835.
- Davidov M.I. Ultrasound diagnosis of bezoars and intestinal stones. Ul'trazvukovaja i funkcion. diagnostika 2009; 4: 83–84 (in Russian).
- Taklit Y.C., Karamercan M.A., Coskun F. Radiopaque Fecaloma Presenting wich Mimic Foreign Body. I. Academic Emergency Medicine 2013; 12: 164–166.
- Davydkin V.I., Anaskin S.G. Mineralobesoars of the stomach and small intestine. Vestnik hirurgii 2001; 160 (4): 100–101 (in Russian).
- Quassi M., Sielezneff I., Benoist S., Pirro N., Cretel E., Chaix I. B. et al. Lethal fecaloma. I. American Geriatr. Society 2007; 55: 965–967.
