Blood donors' satisfaction with medical services

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Objective. To assess the level of blood donors` satisfaction with the services provided by the Research and Production Center of Transfusiology in Astana for the period from 2022 to 2024 and to formulate recommendations for improving the quality of these services.

Materials and methods. The donors` questionnaire included four questions regarding the availability of donor information, the quality of staff work during the manipulations and procedures, the level of staff communication skills and the conditions of stay in the RPCT. To assess the conditions for providing medical services to donors, a scale with the following points was proposed: excellent – 5 points, good – 4 points, normal – 3 points, bad – 2 points, very bad – 1 point. The processing of the survey results was carried out using the functionality of pivot tables in the Microsoft Excel program and descriptive statistics.

Results. The final data on the conducted research demonstrate that most of the donors are satisfied with the quality of services provided by the RPCT on the 4 surveyed items: accessability of donor information, the quality of staff work during the manipulations and procedures, the level of staff communication skills and the conditions of stay in the RPCT. However, isolated negative answers which were recorded, allows us to conclude that there are some aspects in the provision of services to donors that can be improved.

Conclusions. For further improvement of the availability of donor information, it is recommended to expand information materials, make more active use of digital and social platforms, introduce visual and interactive content, and study the information needs of donors regularly. This will increase satisfaction and attract more regular participants to the donor movement.

About the authors

A. A. Mukhambetova

Scientific and Production Center for Transfusiology

Email: assiya739@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-6939-3258

Quality Control Manager

Kazakhstan, Astana

S. A. Abdrakhmanova

Scientific and Production Center for Transfusiology

Email: assiya739@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0782-1795

PhD (Medicine), Chairman of the Board

Kazakhstan, Astana

N. B. Alpamys

Scientific and Production Center for Transfusiology

Email: assiya739@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-3294-683X

Head of the Department of Quality Management and Internal Audit

Kazakhstan, Astana

K. Kh. Zhangazieva

Scientific and Production Center for Transfusiology

Email: assiya739@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2005-006X

Head of the Department of Research Management

Kazakhstan, Astana

B. S. Bekmakhanova

Scientific and Production Center for Transfusiology

Email: assiya739@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-7918-5522

Manager of the Department of Research Management

Kazakhstan, Astana

A. K. Turgambayeva

Astana Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: assiya739@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2300-0105

PhD (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Department of Public Health and Management

Kazakhstan, Astana

References

  1. Mohammed A.S. et al. Voluntary blood donation practice and its associated factors among civil servants in Bale Robe town, Southeast Ethiopia, 2021. SAGE Open Medicine 2022; 10: 20503121221102099. doi: 10.1177/20503121221102099
  2. Martin-Santana J.D., Melian-Alzola L. The influence of service quality and anticipated emotions on donor loyalty: An empirical analysis in blood centres in Spain. Health Care Management Science 2022; 25: 623–648. doi: 10.1007/s10729-022-09600-9
  3. Romero-Domшnguez L. et al. The influence of sociodemographic and donation behaviour characteristics on blood donation motivations. Blood Transfusion 2021; 19 (5): 366–375. doi: 10.2450/2021.0193-20
  4. France C.R., France J.L., Himawan L.K., Fox K.R., Livitz I.E., Ankawi B., Slepian P.M., Kowalsky J.M., Duffy L., Kessler D.A. Results from the blood donor competence, autonomy, and relatedness enhancement (blood donor CARE) randomized trial. Transfusion 2021; 61 (9): 2637–2649. doi: 10.1111/trf.16577
  5. Trovao A.C.G.B., Zucoloto M.L., Martinez E.Z. Development of a blood donor satisfaction questionnaire (BDSQ). Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy 2020; 42 (4): 333–340. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2019.09.004
  6. Senavirathna S.K., Abeysekera N. Comparison of donor satisfaction between in-house blood donation and mobile blood donation campaigns in Sri Lanka. Global Journal of Transfusion Medicine 2024; 9 (2): 141–144. doi: 10.4103/gjtm.gjtm_38_24
  7. Dorle A. et al. A review of amelioration of awareness about blood donation through various effective and practical strategies. Cureus 2023; 15 (10): e46892. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46892
  8. Martinez E.Z. et al. Recommendations for application and interpretation of the Blood Donor Satisfaction Questionnaire (BDSQ). Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy 2021; 43 (3): 236–242. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2020.03.007
  9. Villa-Gallon J.E., Valencia-Bernal J.A., Garces-Gomez Y.A. ISO standards in healthcare organizations: Research evolution and trends from a bibliometric analysis. Publications 2024; 12 (3): 27. doi: 10.3390/publications12030027
  10. Christian W., Marie D., Harald K., Martin O., Michael M. Motivation, blood donor satisfaction and intention to return during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vox Sanguinis 2022; 117 (4): 488–494. doi: 10.1111/vox.13212
  11. Edson Z., Rui A., Miriane L., Ana C. Recommendations for application and interpretation of the Blood Donor Satisfaction Questionnaire (BDSQ). Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy 2021; 43 (3): 236–24. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2020.03.007
  12. Josefa D., Lucia M. The influence of service quality and anticipated emotions on donor loyalty: an empirical analysis in blood centres in Spain. Health Care Management Science 2022; 25: 623–648. doi: 10.1007/s10729-022-09600-9

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Results of a survey on donor satisfaction with the availability of information about donation, % (absolute)

Download (58KB)
3. Fig. 2. Level of donor satisfaction with the quality of staff work when performing manipulations and procedures in dynamics for 2022–2024, %

Download (48KB)
4. Fig. 3. Results of a survey on donor satisfaction with conditions at the NPTs, % (absolute)

Download (52KB)

Copyright (c) 2025 Eco-Vector


 


Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).