Risk prediction for development of benign ovarian tumors in postmenopause
- Authors: Shashurina Y.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Perm Regional Clinical Hospital
- Issue: Vol 42, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 49-54
- Section: Original studies
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/PMJ/article/view/287609
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/pmj42149-54
- ID: 287609
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Objective. To calculate the risk prediction of benign ovarian tumor (BOT) development in postmenopausal patients.
Materials and methods. 60 postmenopausal women participated in the prospective study. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the main group which included women with BOT and comparison group – patients with no neoplasms of the uterine appendages. The clinical and medical history data were assessed, laboratory tests (vitamin D level, insulin-like growth factor 1, leptin, zinc, estradiol, testosterone, sex steroid-binding globulin, cancer marker 125) were performed, results of instrumental methods of examination (pelvic ultrasound) were analyzed as well as surgical treatment protocols and histological studies. Regression analysis of the data obtained was carried out, statistically significant features were determined and the mathematical model for the risk prediction of the development of BOT in postmenopause was created.
Results. The investigation showed that an isolated assessment of the studied laboratory markers has no statistical significance for determining the risk of developing postmenopausal ovarian tumors; a multifactorial approach is relevant, that is assessing a combination of factors.
Conclusions. The developed mathematical model for predicting the development of postmenopausal ovarian tumors demonstrated an increase in the effectiveness of risk prognosis for developing postmenopausal ovarian tumors in postmenopausal patients, the sensitivity of the developed method was 95 %, specificity 85.7 %.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Yu. A. Shashurina
Perm Regional Clinical Hospital
Author for correspondence.
Email: jusya15@yandex.ru
Degree Candidate of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology no. 1, Obstetrician-gynecologist of the Gynecology Department
Russian Federation, PermReferences
- Подзолкова Н.М., Кузнецов Р.Э. Состояние проблемы ранней диагностики и лечения доброкачественных опухолей яичников у пациенток в постменопаузе (обзор литературы). Гинекология 2021; 23 (4): 294–299. / Podzolkova N.M., Kuznetsov R.E. Early diagnosis and treatment of benign ovarian tumors in postmenopause, the state of the problem (literature review). Gynecology 2021; 23 (4): 294–299 (in Russian).
- Brun J.L., Fritel X., Aubard Y., Borghese B. Management of presumed benign ovarian tumors: updated French guidelines. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2014; 183: 52–8.
- Erdogan Nohuz, Luisa De Simone, Gautier Chêne. Reliability of IOTA score and ADNEX model in the screening of ovarian malignancy in postmenopausal women. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction 2019; 48 (2): 103–107.
- Озерская И.А. Стандартизация ультразвукового исследования патологии придатков матки по IOTA и O-RADS: методические рекомендации 2022. / Ozerskaya I.A. Standartization of ultrasound investigation of uterine appendages' pathology by IOTA и O-RADS: guidelines. 2022 (in Russian).
- Чибисова Г.М., Хабаров С.В. Комплексное определение онкомаркеров СА125, НЕ4 и индекса ROMA как фактор прогноза развития рака. Вестник новых медицинских технологии 2018; 25 (3): 15–20. / Chibisova G.M., Chabarov S.V. Complex determination of tumor markers СА125, НЕ4 and ROMA index as a prognostic factor for ovarian cancer development. Journal of new medical technologies 2018; 25 (3): 15–20 (in Russian).
- Алентов И.И., Новикова Е.Г., Сергеева Н.С. Опухоль-ассоциированные маркеры СА125 и НЕ4: эффективность и ограничения при диагностике злокачественных опухолей яичников. Акушерство и гинекология: новости, мнения, обучение 2017; 1. / Alentov I.I., Novikova E.G., Sergeeva N.S. Tumor assosiated markers СА125 и НЕ4: effectiveness and restrictions in diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumors. Obstetrics and Gynecology: News, Options, Training 2017; 1 (in Russian).
- Irvin S.R., Weiderpass E., Stanczyk F.Z. Association of AntiMullerian Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, and Inhibin B with Risk of Ovarian Cancer in the Janus Serum Bank. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers Prevention 2020; 13.
- Bingcheng Guo, Wei Lian. Comparison of diagnostic values between CA125 combined with CA199 and ultrasound combined with CT in ovarian cancer. Oncology Letters 2019; 17 (6): 5523–5528.
- Denise R. Nebgen, Zhen Lu., Chae Young Han. Biomarkers and Strategies for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer. Current Oncology and Reproduction 2019; 21 (8): 75.
- Robert C. Bast Jr. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers. Prev. 2020; 29 (12): 2504–2512.
Supplementary files
