Relationship of augmentation mammoplasty with peculiarities of self-perception and quality of life level
- Authors: Khramtsova N.I.1, Plaksin S.A.2, Zayakin Y.Y.2, Glushenkov A.S.3, Fadeeva M.V.3, Sotskov A.Y.2, Ponomarev D.N.2
-
Affiliations:
- Ltd company “Nalexia”
- E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University
- Moscow State University of Food Production
- Issue: Vol 39, No 2 (2022)
- Pages: 29-36
- Section: Original studies
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/PMJ/article/view/107255
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/pmj39229-36
- ID: 107255
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Objective. To study the impact of augmentation mammoplasty on some aspects of body image-related quality of life, motivation and self-esteem.
Materials and methods. Seventeen women were surveyed 6-14 months after augmentation mammoplasty using the BIQLI and ASI-R questionnaires.
Results. The aspects of body image-related quality of life associated with physical activity and desire to change one's appearance were higher in younger people with lower body weight. The volume of installed breast implants was inversely proportional to the feeling of confidence and happiness in everyday life (R = –0.6). The larger was the volume of implants, the less was the responsibility for life events (R = –0.8). In the long-term period after mammoplasty, a subjective level of the quality of life increased in 53 %, on average by 0.2 (p>0.05), significantly – only for the motivation scale and the question "feelings of personal dignity and self-respect". Negative dynamics was found for the following aspects: "When I meet new people", "At work (study)" and "Relationships with friends", for all other answers – positive one. The older the patients were, the more attention they paid to their appearance (R = –0.7) and compared themselves with the others (R = –0.6), thought about what the others think about their appearance (R = 0,6), more often thought about how they look like in different situations (R = 0.6).
Conclusions. Preoperative studying of motivation allows more differentially determining the indications for surgery and risk of postoperative dissatisfaction. Augmentation mammoplasty often improves the body image-related quality of life, motivation and self-esteem.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
N. I. Khramtsova
Ltd company “Nalexia”
Email: Sozkov1998a@mail.ru
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Surgeon, Endoscopist, Chief Physician
Russian Federation, PermS. A. Plaksin
E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University
Email: Sozkov1998a@mail.ru
Professor, Department of Surgery with Course of Cardiovascular Surgery and Invasive Cardiology
Russian Federation, PermYu. Yu. Zayakin
E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University
Email: Sozkov1998a@mail.ru
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Narcology and Medical Psychology
Russian Federation, PermA. S. Glushenkov
Moscow State University of Food Production
Email: Sozkov1998a@mail.ru
resident
Russian Federation, MoscowM. V. Fadeeva
Moscow State University of Food Production
Email: Sozkov1998a@mail.ru
resident
Russian Federation, MoscowA. Yu. Sotskov
E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: Sozkov1998a@mail.ru
sixth year student
Russian Federation, PermD. N. Ponomarev
E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University
Email: Sozkov1998a@mail.ru
sixth year student
Russian Federation, PermReferences
- Alderman A.K., Bauer J., Fardo D., Abrahamse P., Pusic A. Understanding the effect of breast augmentation on quality of life: prospective analysis using the BREAST-Q. PlastReconstr Surg. 2014 Apr; 133 (4): 787-795.
- Klassen A.F., Pusic A.L., Scott A., Klok J., Cano S.J. Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health 2009; 9: 11.
- Quirós M.C., Bolaños M.C., Fassero J.J. Six-Year Prospective Outcomes of Primary Breast Augmentation With Nano Surface Implants. Aesthet. Surg. J. 2019; 39 (5): 495-508.
- Carthy C.M., Cano S.J., Klassen A.F., et al. The magnitude of effect of cosmetic breast augmentation on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2012; 130 (1): 218-223.
- Kalaaji A., Bjertness C.B., Nordahl C., Olafsen K. Survey of breast implant patients: characteristics, depression rate, and quality of life. Aesthet. Surg. J. 2013; 33 (2): 252-257.
- Ng S., Pusic A., Parker E., et al. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Breast Implant Surgery: A Pilot Study. Aesthet. Surg. J. 2019; 39 (8): 314–321.
- Jewell M.L., Jewell J.L. A comparison of outcomes involving highly cohesive, form-stable breast implants from two manufacturers in patients undergoing primary breast augmentation. Aesthet. Surg. J. 2010; 30 (1): 51–65.
- Noorizadeh H., Bari B.K. The effect of breast augmentation surgery on quality of life, satisfaction, and marital life in married women using BREAST-Q as a validation tool. J. Family Med. Prim. Care. 2020; 9 (2): 711–713.
- Rzepa T., Grzesiak W., Zaborski D., Modrzejewski A., Pastucha M. Physical attractiveness and self-assessment before and after breast augmentation. Ann Plast Surg. 2014; 72 (6): 618–624.
- Fagrell D., Berggren A., Tarpila E. Capsular contracture around saline-filled fine textured and smooth mammary implants: a prospective 7.5-year follow-up. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2001; 108 (7): 2108–2113.
- Kalaaji A., Dreyer S., Brinkmann J., Maric I., Nordahl C., Olafsen K. Quality of Life After Breast Enlargement With Implants Versus Augmentation Mastopexy: A Comparative Study. Aesthet. Surg. J. 2018; 38 (12): 1304–1315.
- Nikolić J., Janjić Z., Marinković M., Petrović J, Bozić T. Psychosocial characteristics and motivational factors in woman seeking cosmetic breast augmentation surgery. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2013; 70 (10): 940-946.
- Swanson E. Prospective outcome study of 225 cases of breast augmentation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2013; 131 (5): 1158-1166.
- Kaasa T., Romundstad L., Roald H., Skolleborg K., Stubhaug A. Hyperesthesia one year after breast augmentation surgery increases the odds for persisting pain at four years A prospective four-year follow-up study. Scand. J. Pain. 2010; 1 (2): 75-81.
- Pusic A.L., Klassen A.F., Scott A.M., Klok J.A., Cordeiro P.G., Cano S.J. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2009; 124 (2): 345–353.
- Cash T.F., Fleming, E.C. The impact of body-image experiences: Development of the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 2002; 31: 455–460.
- Cash T.F. Brief manual for the appearance schemas inventory-revised. Cash: ASI-R brief manual. 2003; 1.
- Khramtsova N.I., Zayakin Yu.Yu., Plaksin S.A., Glushenkov A.S., Fadeeva M.V. Methodological aspects of studying body image in surgical patients. Novosti hirurgii. 2021; 29 (2): 154–166 (in Russian)
- Alderman A., Pusic A., Murphy D.K. Prospective Analysis of Primary Breast Augmentation on Body Image Using the BREAST-Q: Results from a Nationwide Study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2016; 137 (6): 954–960.
- Brault N., Stivala A., Guillier D., et al. Correction of tuberous breast deformity: A retrospective study comparing lipofilling versus breast implant augmentation. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2017; 70 (5): 585–595.
Supplementary files
