Diseases and abnormalities of the nipple-areolar complex: a case report series

Cover Image

Cite item

Abstract

The nipple–areolar complex is a specific anatomical and histological structure. Normal structure and pathological process variabilities and the complexity of diagnostic imaging cause difficulties for radiologists and physicians. Breast magnetic resonance imaging is highly sensitive for structural features and nipple-areolar complex cancer detection. Magnetic resonance imaging is a useful diagnostic tool when mammography and ultrasound findings are inconclusive. It allows visualization of the retroareolar region, suitable for the diagnosis of papillomas, adenomas, Paget’s disease, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive ductal carcinoma.

This is a case report on identifying the pathology and anomalies of the nipple-areolar complex, which may benefit radiologists, gynecologists, and residents.

About the authors

Elena N. Karanadze

Clinical Diagnostic Center MEDSI on Krasnaya Presnya

Author for correspondence.
Email: ekaranadze@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6745-1672

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Valentin E. Sinitsyn

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Medical Scientific and Educational Center

Email: info@npcmr.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5649-2193
SPIN-code: 8449-6590

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Mariia A. Karanadze

The Russian National Research Medical University named after N.I. Pirogov

Email: ekaranadze@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-1723-6796
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Stone K, Wheeler A. A Review of anatomy, physiology, and benign pathology of the nipple. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(10):3236–3240. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4760-4
  2. Reisenbichler E, Hanley KZ. Seminars in diagnostic pathology developmental disorders and malformations of the breast. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2019;36(1):11–15. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2018.11.007
  3. Liao CY, Wu YT, Wu WP, et al. Role of breast magnetic resonance imaging in predicting malignant invasion of the nipple-areolar complex: Potential predictors and reliability between inter-observers. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(28):e7170. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007170
  4. Milon A, Wahab CA, Kermarrec E, et al. Breast MRI: Is faster better? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214(2):282–95. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21924
  5. Acrpractice parameterfor the performance of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast. AcoR; 2018. Available from: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/MR-Contrast-Breast.pdf. Accessed: 15.01.2023.
  6. Lee SJ, Trikha S, Moy L, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria evaluation of nipple discharge. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(5s):S138–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.030
  7. Ferris-James DM, Iuanow E, Mehta TS, et al. Imaging approaches to diagnosis and management of common ductal abnormalities. Radiographics. 2012;32(4):1009–1030. doi: 10.1148/rg.324115150
  8. Del Riego J, Pitarch M, Codina C, et al. Multimodality approach to the nipple-areolar complex: A pictorial review and diagnostic algorithm. Insights Imaging. 2020 5;11(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00896-1
  9. Yoon JH, Yoon H, Kim EK, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of women with pathologic nipple discharge. Ultrasonography. 2017;36(4):310–320. doi: 10.14366/usg.17013
  10. Horvat JV, Keating DM, Rodrigues-Duarte H, et al. Calcifications at digital breast tomosynthesis: Imaging features and biopsy techniques. Radiographics. 2019;39(2):307–318. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180124
  11. Huppe AI, Overman KL, Gatewood JB, et al. Mammography positioning standards in the digital era: Is the status quo acceptable? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(6):1419–1425. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17522
  12. Gao Y, Brachtel EF, Hernandez O, Heller SL. An analysis of nipple enhancement at breast MRI with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2019;39(1):10–27. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180039
  13. Lim HS, Jeong SJ, Lee JS, et al. Paget disease of the breast: Mammographic, US, and MR Imaging findings with pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2011;31(7):1973–1987. doi: 10.1148/rg.317115070
  14. Geffroy D, Doutriaux-Dumoulins I. Clinical abnormalities of the nipple-areola complex: The role of imaging. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015;96(10):1033–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2015.07.001
  15. Moon JY, Chang YW, Lee EH, Seo DY. Malignant invasion of the nipple-areolar complex of the breast: Usefulness of breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(2):448–455. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9186
  16. Maksimov DA, Sergeev AN, Morozov AM, et al. About modern types of surgical treatment for breast cancer (literature review). Journal of new medical technologies, eEdition. 2021;(1):7–13. (In Russ). doi: 10.24412/2075-4094-2021-1-1-1
  17. Zikiryakhodzhaev AD, Volchenko NN, Saribekyan EK, Rasskazova EA. Lesion of the nipple-areola complex in patients with breast cancer. Problems in oncology. 2017;63(4):593–597. (In Russ).
  18. Levchuk AL, Khodyrev SA, Shabaev RM. Current state of breast reconstructive surgery. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2021;16(2):122–127. (In Russ). doi: 10.25881/20728255-2021-16-2-122
  19. Berger N, Luparia A, Di Leo G, et al. Diagnostic performance of MRI versus galactography in women with pathologic nipple discharge: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(2):465–471. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16682
  20. Sripathi S, Ayachit A, Kadavigere R, et al. Spectrum of imaging findings in Paget’s disease of the breast: A pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2015;6(4):419–429. doi: 10.1007/s13244-015-0415-z
  21. Da Costa D, Taddese A, Cure ML, et al. Common and unusual diseases of the nipple-areolar complex. Radiographics. 2007;27(Suppl. 1):S65–S77. doi: 10.1148/rg.27si075512
  22. Alhayo ST, Edirimanne S. Clinically challenging case of nipple adenoma. Breast J. 2018;24(6):1084–1085. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13089

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Figure 1. Erosive nipple changes in Paget’s disease.

Download (114KB)
3. Figure 2. Paget’s disease: increased blood flow on color Doppler imaging.

Download (249KB)
4. Figure 3. Magnetic resonance imaging of Paget’s disease (early enhancement phase): the retroareolar area of segmental enhancement from the nipple level to the posterior breast (arrow).

Download (75KB)
5. Figure 4. Magnetic resonance imaging of Paget’s disease (maximum intensity projection): the retroareolar area of segmental enhancement from the nipple level to the posterior breast (arrow).

Download (73KB)
6. Figure 5. A nipple adenoma: mammography (mediolateral oblique projection).

Download (96KB)
7. Figure 6. A nipple adenoma: mammography (craniocaudal projection).

Download (96KB)
8. Figure 7. Magnetic resonance imaging of a nipple adenoma (early postcontrast series): a right nipple mass homogeneously accumulating a contrast agent (arrow).

Download (65KB)
9. Figure 8. Magnetic resonance imaging of a nipple adenoma (parametric map): a right nipple mass with rapid contrast enhancement and subsequent elimination, type III graphic curve.

Download (305KB)
10. Figure 9. Magnetic resonance imaging (early postcontrast series): asymmetric contrast accumulation in the left nipple; normal finding (arrow).

Download (73KB)
11. Figure 10. Magnetic resonance imaging (MIP): asymmetric contrast accumulation in the left nipple; normal finding (arrow).

Download (72KB)
12. Figure 11. Ultrasound image of the left breast with the inverted nipple.

Download (67KB)
13. Figure 12. Magnetic resonance imaging (subtraction): a retroareolar mass with accumulation of contrast agent (inverted nipple, arrow).

Download (57KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies