Reading Books as a Subject of Philosophy of Justice

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article considers the philosophy of justice as a possibility of realization of collective autocommunication. Psychoanalysis helps to enrich the philosophy of justice by linking the study of reactions to internal states and to external social situations by the concept of autocommunication. The incorporation of psychoanalytic definitions (desire) into the conceptual-categorical apparatus of economics (resource, capital) allowsus to analyze the process of transition of issues of social equality and fair distribution from the field of ethics to an extended version of the social game that includes reading experience. The position of Amartya Sen, who constructs a particular field of readerly consumption that is both scenic and conducive to the accumulation of social experience rather than simply its public manifestation, is critically examined. It is suggested that reading should be seen as a desire to use a limited material or emotional resource, actualizing fantasy as a manifestation of excess and as an autocommunication, an encounter with the self as the subject of fantasization. Surplus communication expands notions of the responsibility of justice by turning the reader into a mirror of autocommunication.

About the authors

Alexander Viktorovich Markov

Russian State University for the Humanities

Email: markovius@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6874-1073
Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor, Department of Cinema and Contemporary Art Moscow, Chayanova St., 15

Oksana Aleksandrovna Shtayn

Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin

Email: shtaynshtayn@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-1701-3147
Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor Department of Philosophy Ekaterinburg, Lenin Avenue, 51

References

  1. Европейский словарь философий. Лексикон непереводимостей. (2015). Ред. Б. Кассен. Киев: Дух i лiтера. Cassin, B. (ed.). (2015). Dictionary of untranslatables. Kyiv. (In Russ.)
  2. Кассен, Б. (2000). Эффект софистики. М.-СПб.: Московский философский фонд Университетская книга, Культурная инициатива. Cassin, B. (2000). L’effet sophistique. Moscow; St. Petersburg. (In Russ.)
  3. Нуссбаум, М. (2014). Не прибыли ради. Зачем демократам нужны гуманитарные науки. М.: Высшая школа экономики (Государственный университет). Nussbaum, M. (2014). Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Moscow. (In Russ.)
  4. Нуссбаум, М. (2023). Политические эмоции. Почему любовь важна для справедливости. М.: Новое литературное обозрение. Nussbaum, M. (2023). Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice. Moscow. (In Russ.)
  5. Сен, А. К. (2004). Развитие как свобода. М.: Новое издательство. Sen, A. K. (2004). Development as Freedom. Moscow. (in Russ.)
  6. Сен, А. К. (2016). Идея справедливости. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара. Sen, А. К. (2016). The idea of justice. Moscow. (In Russ.)
  7. Anderson, E. (2005). Critical Notice of Amartya Sen, “Rationality and Freedom”. The Philosophical Review. Vol. 114. No. 2. Pp. 253-271.
  8. Meeks, J. G. (2017). Amartya Sen (1933–). The Palgrave Companion to Cambridge Economics. Pp. 1045-1077.
  9. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  10. Yamamori, T. (2018). The concept of need in Amartya Sen: commentary to the expanded edition of Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Ethics and Social Welfare. Vol. 12. No. 4. Pp. 387‑392.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).