Correlating artificial intelligence and authenticity: EFL students' practice when using ChatGPT in academic writing

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

this study analyses EFL learners' experiences and strategies when using ChatGPT in academic writing instruction. The paper uses a qualitative case study method with fifty-three EFL learners with different levels of language proficiency. The key findings show that ChatGPT facilitates overcoming uncertainty, clarifying vocabulary and making content suggestions, enhancing essay quality and allowing students to focus on unlocking their creativity. However, the stable balance between AI tools and human reasoning is critical to ensure trustworthiness. The ChatGPT system raises concerns about the validity of academic work, while stressing the need for ethical standards. Its limitations, such as creating overly complex sentences and lack of cultural sensitivity, require mandatory human intervention. Educators are challenged to develop ethical guidelines, focusing on critical thinking and authenticity. Training programmes for lecturers and learners on the responsible implementation of AI are vital. Despite the comprehensive approach, the small sample size limits the possibility of diverse, exhaustive generalization, and reliance on self-collected data introduces potential bias. Future studies should reach larger audiences, include diverse samples, and include objective measures to eliminate bias.

About the authors

T. N Pankova

Voronezh State University

Email: pankova@rgph.vsu.ru

N. V Yalaeva

Russian Technological University MIREA

N. V Sadykova

Ural State Law University named after V.F. Yakovlev

V. V Tomin

Orenburg State University

A. D Kolbasina

Vladimir Law Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia

References

  1. Панкова Т.Н., Абдуллаева З.Р., Еферова А.Р. [и др.] Онлайн обучение английскому языку: изменения в парадигме системы образования // Современная наука: актуальные проблемы теории и практики. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. 2022. № 4. С. 75 – 79. doi: 10.37882/2223-2982.2022.04.29.
  2. Усов С.С., Хорохорина Г.А., Ежова Е.В. [и др.] Этические аспекты цифровой трансформации образования // Вестник педагогических наук. 2024. № 8. С. 239 – 245. doi: 10.62257/2687-1661-2024-8-239-245.
  3. De la Vall R.R.F., Araya F.G. Exploring the benefits and challenges of AI-language learning tools // International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention. 2023. Т. 10. № 01. С. 7569 – 7576.
  4. Gilburt I. A machine in the loop: the peculiar intervention of artificial intelligence in writer’s block // New Writing. 2024. Т. 21. № 1. С. 26 – 37.
  5. Guo K., Li D. Understanding EFL students’ use of self-made AI chatbots as personalized writing assistance tools: A mixed methods study // System. 2024. Т. 124. С. 103362.
  6. Jarrah A.M., Wardat Y., Fidalgo P. Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say // Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies. 2023. Т. 13. № 4. С. e202346.
  7. Kim J. [et al.] Exploring students’ perspectives on Generative AI-assisted academic writing //Education and Information Technologies. 2024. С. 1 – 36.
  8. Levanova E.A., Berezhnaya I.F., Krivotulova E.V. [et al.] Individual learning path for future specialists' development // TEM Journal: Technology, Education, Management, Informatics. 2019. Vol. 8. No. 4. P. 1384 – 1391. doi: 10.18421/TEM84-40.
  9. Lingard L. Writing with ChatGPT: An illustration of its capacity, limitations & implications for academic writers // Perspectives on medical education. 2023. Т. 12. № 1. С. 261.
  10. Marzuki [et al.] The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective // Cogent Education. 2023. Т. 10. № 2. С. 2236469.
  11. Nguyen A. [et al.] Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing // Studies in Higher Education. 2024. С. 1 – 18.
  12. Kuile B. The Use of AI to Assist Writing Your Paper // Life Sciences Research and Scientific Writing. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. С. 89 – 93.
  13. Wang C. Exploring Students’ Generative AI-Assisted Writing Processes: Perceptions and Experiences from Native and Nonnative English Speakers // Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2024. С. 1 – 22.
  14. Wu L. [et al.] AI-based Writing Tools: Empowering Students to Achieve Writing Success // Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology. 2024. Т. 8. № 2. С. 40 – 44.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).