A functional-pragmatic approach to wealth-related euphemisms study in business discourse
- Autores: Malyuga E.N.1, Tomalin B.2
-
Afiliações:
- RUDN University
- Glasgow Caledonian University London
- Edição: Volume 29, Nº 3 (2025)
- Páginas: 473-491
- Seção: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2687-0088/article/view/332243
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-44130
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BETFKR
- ID: 332243
Citar
Texto integral
Resumo
In business discourse, euphemisms help alleviate the sensitive topic of material privilege. While previous research has extensively addressed euphemisms denoting various financial phenomena, such as corporate downsizing and recession, the linguistic treatment of wealth has remained comparatively underexplored. The aim of the study is to identify the key pragmatic functions of euphemisms referring to wealth and the wealthy in contemporary English-language business discourse, and to establish how these euphemisms mediate the social perception of affluence. The data comprises publications from prominent English-language business media sampled from a five-year period. Through continuous sampling, a total of 134 occurrences of euphemistic framing were extracted and analysed contextually. The article delineates four primary pragmatic functions of euphemisms denoting wealth: mitigating social sensitivity, strategic reframing, positive image construction, and abstraction. The results demonstrate that these functions are systemic and fulfil distinct pragmatic roles in business discourse. Mitigation strategies soften references to affluence, reframing aligns wealth with meritocratic achievement, positive construction associates affluence with prestige and expertise, and abstraction depersonalises wealth through technical language. The findings suggest that euphemisms denoting wealth and the wealthy in business discourse operate to justify the idea that economic privilege is legitimate. Euphemistic framing contributes to the rhetorical normalization of affluence and configures public perceptions of wealth in business discourse. The study adds to the body of knowledge on euphemism and business discourse and demonstrates the usefulness of the functional-pragmatic approach in identifying the rhetorical devices used in high-stakes arguments.
Palavras-chave
Sobre autores
Elena Malyuga
RUDN University
Email: malyuga-en@rudn.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6935-0661
Dr. Habil., Professor of Linguistics, Head of Foreign Languages Department at the Faculty of Economics, RUDN University, Moscow, Russia. She is Editor-in-Chief of the journals “Issues of Applied Linguistics” and “Training, Language and Culture”. Her research interests embrace theory and practice of intercultural professional and business communication, pragmatics, corpus studies, discourse analysis
Moscow, RussiaBarry Tomalin
Glasgow Caledonian University London
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: barrytomalin@aol.com
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7192-0301
expert in international communication, cultures and media, founder and coordinator of Business Cultural Trainers Certificate. He is Professor at Glasgow Caledonian University London (UK), author and co-author of a number of books on international business culture and communication.
London (UK)Bibliografia
- Akopova, Asya S. 2024. Stylistic features of English-language sports discourse. Issues of Applied Linguistics 56. 34–61. https://doi.org/10.25076/vpl.56.02
- Allan, Keith & Kate Burridge. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Burridge, Kate. 2012. Euphemism and language change: The sixth and seventh ages. Lexis. Journal in English Lexicology 7. Article 355. https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.355
- Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer. 2018. Euphemism as a discursive strategy in US local and state politics. Journal of Language and Politics 17 (6). 789–811. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17040.cre
- Eslami, Zohreh, Tatiana Larina & Roya Pashmforoosh. 2023. Identity, politeness and discursive practices in a changing world. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27.1 (2023): 7–38. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34051
- Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Intertextuality in critical discourse analysis. Linguistics and Education 4. 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(92)90004-G
- Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
- Fillmore, Charles J. 2006. Frame semantics. Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings 34. 373–400.
- Gribanova, Tatiana I. & Tamara M. Gaidukova. 2019. Hedging in different types of discourse. Training, Language and Culture 3 (2). 85–99. https://doi.org/10.29366/2019tlc.3.2.6
- Galchuk, Larissa M. 2017. “The twenty percent solution”: The concept of social capital through the new words in English business discourse at the turn of the 21st century. Russian Journal of Linguistics 21 (1). 126–140. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-1-126-140
- Goddard, Cliff, Anna Wierzbicka & Gian Marco Farese. 2022. The conceptual semantics of “money” and “money verbs”. Russian Journal of Linguistics 26 (1). 7–30. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-27193
- Grishechko, Elizaveta G. & Barry Tomalin. 2025. Cognitive engagement in scientific writing: Empirical evidence on research data processing variation. Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics 11 (2). 54–79. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2025-11-2-0-3
- Grishechko, Elizaveta G., Gaurav Sharma & Kristina Y. Zheleznova. 2021. Peculiarities of Indian English as a separate language. Propositos y Representaciones 9 (S1). Article e913. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9nSPE1.913
- Grishechko, Oksana S. & Asya S. Akopova. 2015. Ethno-metric parameters of communicative analysis of verbal behavior. Almanac of Modern Science and Education 11 (101). 32–34. EDN: UZHLYR
- Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. Matthiessen. 2013. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.
- Halliday, Michael A. K. & Jonathan J. Webster. 2009. Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum.
- Hunston, Susan. 2007. Semantic prosody revisited. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12 (2). 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.12.2.09hun
- Koller, Veronika. 2005. Critical discourse analysis and social cognition: Evidence from business media discourse. Discourse & Society 16 (2). 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505049621
- Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science 4 (2). 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0402_4
- Leontovich, Olga A. & Anna V. Nikitina. 2024. Communication monitoring as a politeness mechanism. Training, Language and Culture 8 (3). 62–72. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2024-8-3-62-72
- Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Litvinova, Angela V. & Tatiana V. Larina. 2023. Mitigation tools and politeness strategies in invitation refusals: American and Russian communicative cultures. Training, Language and Culture 7 (1). 116–130. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2023-7-1-116-130
- Malyuga, Elena N. 2019. Functional Approach to Professional Discourse Exploration in Linguistics. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9103-4
- Malyuga, Elena N. 2024. Manipulative potential of humor in business media discourse: Drawing up a “starter pack” for LSP teaching. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education 12 (1). 133–143. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-1-133-143
- Malyuga, Elena N. & Barry Tomalin. 2024. Euphemisms in South African English economic discourse: Socio-cultural aspects. Russian Journal of Linguistics 28(3). 512–534. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-39076
- Malyuga, Elena N. & Wayne Rimmer. 2021. Making sense of “buzzword” as a term through co-occurrences analysis. Heliyon 7 (6). Article e07208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07208
- Mooney, Annbelle. 2019. A fool and his money are soon parted: A critical examination of credit card websites. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (3). 642–658. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-3-642-658
- Murashova, Ekaterina P. 2021. The role of the cognitive metaphor in the hybridisation of marketing and political discourses: An analysis of English-language political advertising. Training, Language and Culture 5 (2). 22–36. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2021-5-2-22-36
- Musolff, Andreas. 2019. Creativity in metaphor interpretation. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (1). 23–39. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-1-23-39
- Ozyumenko, Vladimir & Tatiana V. Larina. 2021. Threat and fear: Pragmatic purposes of emotionalisation in media discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (3). 746–766. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-746-766
- Popova, Ksenia V. 2018. Persuasion strategy in online social advertising. Training, Language and Culture 2 (2). 55–65. https://doi.org/10.29366/2018tlc.2.2.4
- Stewart, Dominic. 2010. Semantic Prosody: A Critical Evaluation. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203870075
- Tamimy, Mohammad, Leila Setayesh Zarei & Khaghaninejad Mohammad Khaghaninejad. 2022. Collectivism and individualism in US culture: An analysis of attitudes to group work. Training, Language and Culture 6 (2). 20–34. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2022-6-2-20-34
- van Dijk, Teun A. 2011. Elite discourse and racism. In Iris M. Zavala, Teun A. van Dijk & Myriam Díaz-Diocaretz (eds.), Approaches to discourse, poetics and psychiatry, 81–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/ct.4.07dij
- van Dijk, Teun A. 2024. Context models and the pragmatics of discourse. Discourse Processes 61 (6–7). 311–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2024.2336413
- Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London, New York: Edward Arnold.
Arquivos suplementares
