THERMAL AND HETEROGENEOUS CATALYTIC CONVERSION OF HYDROLYSIS LIGNIN IN 1,4-DIOXANE

N. A. Bobrova; Боброва Н. А.; A. E. Koklin; Коклин А. Е.; T. V. Bogdan; Богдан Т. В.; I. I. Mishanin; Мишанин И. И.; V. I. Bogdan; Богдан В. И.

doi:10.31857/S2686953522600490

THERMAL AND HETEROGENEOUS CATALYTIC CONVERSION OF HYDROLYSIS LIGNIN IN 1,4-DIOXANE

Authors: Bobrova N.A.¹^,2, Koklin A.E.¹, Bogdan T.V.¹^,2, Mishanin I.I.¹^,2, Bogdan V.I.¹
Affiliations:
1. N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
2. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Chemistry
Issue: Vol 509, No 1 (2023)
Pages: 76-82
Section: PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY
URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2686-9535/article/view/135967
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686953522600490
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OVDBPW
ID: 135967

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

The transformation of hydrolytic lignin in 1,4-dioxane at a temperature of 250°C and a pressure of 13.0 MPa and the subsequent hydrogenation of thermal pyrolysis products on a Ru/C catalyst at a temperature of 250°C and a pressure of 10.0 MPa in an autoclave were studied. It has been established that the interaction of hydrolytic lignin with 1,4-dioxane and its catalytic hуdrogenation leads to the splitting of C−O and C−C bonds with the formation of a mixture of products: soluble phenol-derivative oligomers and monomers, products of their hydrogenolysis and hydrogenation, as well as a mixture of C₁−C₅ gas hydrocarbons and C₂−C₅ alcohols, ethers − formed mainly under reaction conditions during the destruction of the solvent − 1,4-dioxane.

Keywords

lignin, 2D NMR structure, depolymerization, hydrogenation, Ru/С, 1,4‑dioxane

References

Боголицын К.Г., Лунин В.В., Косяков Д.С., Карма-нов А.П., Скребец Т.Э., Попова Н.Р., Малков А.В., Горбова Н.С., Пряхин А.Н., Шкаев А.Н., Иванчен-ко Н.Л. Физическая химия лигнина. М.: Академкнига, 2010. 492 с.
Benson T.J., Daggolu P.R., Hernandez R.A., Lui S., White M.G. // Adv. Catal. 2013. V. 56. P. 187– 353. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420173-6.00003-6
Lam E., Luong J.H.T. // ACS Catalysis. 2014. V. 4. № 10. P. 3393–3410. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs5008393
Sugiarto S., Leow Y., Tan C.L., Wang G., Kai D. // Bioactive Mater. 2022. V. 8. P. 71−94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.023
Sethupathy S., Morales G.M., Gao L., Wang H., Yang B., Jiang J., Sun J., Zhu D. // Bioresour. Technol. 2022. V. 347. 126696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126696
Zhou N., Thilakarathna W.P.D.W., He Q.S., Rupasin-ghe H.P.V. // Front. Energy Res. 2022. V. 9. 758744. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.758744
Koklin A.E., Bobrova N.A., Bogdan T.V., Mishanin I.I., Bogdan V.I. // Molecules. 2022. V. 27. № 5. 1494. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27051494
Limarta S.O., Ha J.M., Park Y.K., Lee H., Suh D.J., Jae J. // J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018. V. 57. P. 45−54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.08.006
Yermakov Y.I., Surovikin V.F., Plaksin G.V., Semikole-nov V.A., Likholobov V.A., Chuvilin L.V., Bogdanov S.V. // React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 1987. V. 33. P. 435–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02128102
Kalenchuk A.N., Bogdan V.I., Dunaev S.F., Kustov L.M. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2018. V. 43. № 12. P. 6191–6196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.121
Толкачев Н.Н., Коклин А.Е., Лаптинская Т.В., Лунин В.В., Богдан В.И. // Изв. АН. Сер. хим. 2019. Т. 68. № 8. С. 1613–1620.
Ralph J., Lundquist K., Brunow G., Lu F., Kim H., Schatz P.F., Marita J.M., Hatfield R.D., Ralph S.A., Christensen J.H., Boerjan W. // Phytochem. Rev. 2004. V. 3. P. 29–60. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHYT.0000047809.65444.a4
Balakshin M., Capanema E., Gracz H., Chang H., Planta H.J. // Planta. 2011. V. 233. P. 1097–1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-011-1359-2
Боброва Н.А., Мишанин И.И., Коклин А.Е., Бог-дан В.И. // Сверхкритические Флюиды: Теория и Практика. 2021. Т. 16. № 3. С. 19–24. https://doi.org/10.34984/SCFTP.2021.16.3.002