电邮这篇文章 CONTENT OF DOCOSAHEXAENOIC ACID IN PECTORAL MUSCLES OF BIRDS CORRELATES WITH WING BEAT FREQUENCY
- 作者: Gladyshev M.1,2
-
隶属关系:
- Institute of Biophysics of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences”
- Siberian Federal University
- 期: 卷 508, 编号 1 (2023)
- 页面: 45-47
- 栏目: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2686-7389/article/view/135673
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686738922600741
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MPTMZM
- ID: 135673
如何引用文章
开放存取
##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
订阅存取
详细
Docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n–3, DHA) is a structural component of cell membranes and due to a peculiar form of its molecule exerts a high lateral pressure in the membranes enhancing activity of membrane-associated enzymes. A high content of DHA probably provides a high frequency of contraction and a continuous working of skeletal muscles. To estimate the probable physiological and biochemical role of DHA in muscle tissue, a relation of its contents in pectoral muscles of birds with wing beat frequency was evaluated. A high statistically significant correlation between the content of DHA in pectoral muscles of birds and species-specific wing beat frequency was found.
作者简介
M. Gladyshev
Institute of Biophysics of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences,Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences”; Siberian Federal University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: glad@ibp.ru
Russian Federation, Krasnoyarsk; Russian Federation, Krasnoyarsk
参考
- Simopoulos A.P. // Poult. Sci. 2000. V. 79. P. 961–970.
- Calder P.C. // Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2018. V. 77. P. 52–72.
- Hulbert A.J. // Lipids. 2007. V. 42. P. 811–819.
- Infante J.P., Kirwan R.C., Brenna J.T. // Compar. Biochem. Physiol. B. 2001. V. 130. P. 291–298.
- Gladyshev M.I., Sushchik N.N., Tolomeev A.P., Dgebuadze Y.Y. // Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 2018. V. 28. P. 277–299.
- Gladyshev M.I., Popova O.N., Makhutova O.N., et al. // Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2016. V. 9. P. 503–513.
- Puranik P.G., Gopala Krishna G., Ahmed A. // Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 1977. V. 85B. P. 327–339.
- Pennycuick C.J. // J. Exp. Biol. 1990. V. 150. P. 171–185.
- Nudds R.L., Taylor G.K., Thomas A.L.R. // Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2004. V. 271. P. 2071–2076.
- Schmidt-Wellenburg C.A., Biebach H., Daan S., Vis- ser G.H. // J. Comp. Physiol. B. 2007. V. 177. P. 327–337.
- Bruderer B., Peter D., Boldt A., Liechti F. // Ibis. 2010. V. 152. P. 272–291.
- Dgebuadze Y.Y., Gladyshev M.I. // Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2016. V. 9. P. 391–395.
- Гаврилов В.М. // Доклады Академии наук. 2000. Т. 371. № 2. С. 269–273.
- Gladyshev M.I., Sushchik N.N. // Biomolecules. 2019. V. 9. Paper No. 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9090485
- Twining C.W., Brenna J.T., Lawrence P., et al. // PNAS USA. 2016. V. 113. P. 10920–10925.
- Pilecky M., Zavorka L., Arts M.T., Kainz M.J. // Biol. Rev. 2021. V. 96. P. 2127–2145.
