Enviar artigo por via de e-mail CONTENT OF DOCOSAHEXAENOIC ACID IN PECTORAL MUSCLES OF BIRDS CORRELATES WITH WING BEAT FREQUENCY
- Autores: Gladyshev M.1,2
-
Afiliações:
- Institute of Biophysics of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences”
- Siberian Federal University
- Edição: Volume 508, Nº 1 (2023)
- Páginas: 45-47
- Seção: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2686-7389/article/view/135673
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686738922600741
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MPTMZM
- ID: 135673
Citar
Acesso aberto
Acesso está concedido
Somente assinantes
Resumo
Docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n–3, DHA) is a structural component of cell membranes and due to a peculiar form of its molecule exerts a high lateral pressure in the membranes enhancing activity of membrane-associated enzymes. A high content of DHA probably provides a high frequency of contraction and a continuous working of skeletal muscles. To estimate the probable physiological and biochemical role of DHA in muscle tissue, a relation of its contents in pectoral muscles of birds with wing beat frequency was evaluated. A high statistically significant correlation between the content of DHA in pectoral muscles of birds and species-specific wing beat frequency was found.
Sobre autores
M. Gladyshev
Institute of Biophysics of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences,Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences”; Siberian Federal University
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: glad@ibp.ru
Russian Federation, Krasnoyarsk; Russian Federation, Krasnoyarsk
Bibliografia
- Simopoulos A.P. // Poult. Sci. 2000. V. 79. P. 961–970.
- Calder P.C. // Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2018. V. 77. P. 52–72.
- Hulbert A.J. // Lipids. 2007. V. 42. P. 811–819.
- Infante J.P., Kirwan R.C., Brenna J.T. // Compar. Biochem. Physiol. B. 2001. V. 130. P. 291–298.
- Gladyshev M.I., Sushchik N.N., Tolomeev A.P., Dgebuadze Y.Y. // Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 2018. V. 28. P. 277–299.
- Gladyshev M.I., Popova O.N., Makhutova O.N., et al. // Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2016. V. 9. P. 503–513.
- Puranik P.G., Gopala Krishna G., Ahmed A. // Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 1977. V. 85B. P. 327–339.
- Pennycuick C.J. // J. Exp. Biol. 1990. V. 150. P. 171–185.
- Nudds R.L., Taylor G.K., Thomas A.L.R. // Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2004. V. 271. P. 2071–2076.
- Schmidt-Wellenburg C.A., Biebach H., Daan S., Vis- ser G.H. // J. Comp. Physiol. B. 2007. V. 177. P. 327–337.
- Bruderer B., Peter D., Boldt A., Liechti F. // Ibis. 2010. V. 152. P. 272–291.
- Dgebuadze Y.Y., Gladyshev M.I. // Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2016. V. 9. P. 391–395.
- Гаврилов В.М. // Доклады Академии наук. 2000. Т. 371. № 2. С. 269–273.
- Gladyshev M.I., Sushchik N.N. // Biomolecules. 2019. V. 9. Paper No. 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9090485
- Twining C.W., Brenna J.T., Lawrence P., et al. // PNAS USA. 2016. V. 113. P. 10920–10925.
- Pilecky M., Zavorka L., Arts M.T., Kainz M.J. // Biol. Rev. 2021. V. 96. P. 2127–2145.
