Regime Transformation of the PRC and the Formulation of a Strategy to Contain China: Assessments of American Sinologists

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

This article looks into the discussion of American sinologists regarding the potential of the “Chinese model” and recommendations for Washington on developing a policy to contain China based on these assessments. This issue becomes especially relevant against the backdrop of statements by the PRC leadership about the existence of “Chinese-style modernization” as a non-Western path of development and the emergence of the thesis in the Chinese ideological discourse about Beijing’s readiness to share “Chinese wisdom” and management principles with other countries. It is concluded that opinions of American sinologists on the subject are far from unanimous. There are two main groups of assessments among professional sinologists in the United States regarding the capabilities of the PRC to displace American values and standards of governance on a global scale.

About the authors

V. A. Skosyrev

Institute of China and Contemporary Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: skosyrev@iccaras.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6787-1773
Researcher Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. National Security Strategy. October 2022. Washington, The White House. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf (accessed 04.05.2024).
  2. National Security Strategy. December 2017. Washington, The White House. Available at: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf (accessed 04.05.2024).
  3. A 'China Model?' Beijing's Promotion of Alternative Global Norms and Standards. Hearing before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. Washington, United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission, 2020. Available at: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-10/March_13_Hearing_and_April_27_Roundtable_Transcript_0.pdf (accessed 04.05.2024).
  4. Economy, E. China’s Alternative Order and What America Should Learn from It. Foreign Affairs. May/June 2024. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/china/chinas-alternative-order-xi-jinping-elizabeth-economy (accessed 04.05.2024).
  5. Pottinger, M. and Gallagher, M. No Substitute for Victory. America’s Competition with China Must Be Won, Not Managed. Foreign Affairs. May/June 2024. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/no-substitute-victory-pottingergallagher (accessed 04.05.2024).
  6. Medeiros, E. The Delusion of Peak China. America Can’t Wish Away Its Toughest Challenger. Foreign Affairs. May/June 2024. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/china/delusion-peak-china-united-states-evan-medeiros (accessed 04.05.2024).
  7. Blanchette, J. Xi’s Gamble. The Race to Consolidate Power and Stave Off Disaster. Foreign Affairs. July/August 2021. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2021-06-22/xis-gamble (accessed 04.05.2024).
  8. Fewsmith, J. Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Hearing on "CCP Decision-Making and the 20th Party Congress". Available at: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2022-01/Joseph_Fewsmith_Testimony.pdf (accessed 04.05.2024).
  9. Ikenberry, J.; Nathan, A.; Thornton, S.; Zhe, S.; Mearsheimer, J. A Rival of America’s Making? The Debate Over Washington’s China Strategy. Foreign Affairs. March/April 2022. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2022-02-11/china-strategy-rival-americas-making (accessed 04.05.2024).
  10. Blanchette, J. Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. Hearing on "An Assessment of the CCP’s Economic Ambitions, Plans, and Metrics of Success". April 15, 2020. Available at: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2021-04/Jude_Blanchette_Testimony.pdf (accessed 04.05.2024).
  11. Shambaugh, D. Toward a "Smart Competition" strategy for US China policy. The Struggle for Power: U.S.-China Relations in the 21st Century, Nye, Jr. & Rice, C. (Comp.). 2020. P. 141-154. Available at: https://www.aspeninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/TheStruggleForPower.pdf (accessed 04.05.2024).
  12. Бархатова А.С. Особенности научных и образовательных центров по китаеведению в США. Инновации. Наука. Образование. 2021. № 34. С. 89–97.
  13. Березный Л.А. Постмодернизм и проблемы ориенталистики. Заметки об одной дискуссии синологов США. Восток. Афро-азиатские общества: история и современность. 2004. № 2. С. 146–158.
  14. Портяков В.Я. Время собирать камни: об обобщающих англоязычных трудах по внешней политике Китая. 70 лет современному китайскому государству: Материалы ежегодной научной конференции Центра политических исследований и прогнозов ИДВ РАН, Москва, 20–22 марта 2019 года. М.: Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Институт Дальнего Востока Российской академии наук, 2019. С. 201– 208.
  15. Румянцев Е.Н. О некоторых американских взглядах на Китай. Социально-политическая ситуация накануне XIX съезда КПК: Материалы ежегодной научной конференции Центра политических исследований и прогнозов ИДВ РАН, Москва, 15–17 марта 2017 года. Институт Дальнего Востока Российской академии наук, Центр научной информации и документации. Москва: Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Институт Дальнего Востока Российской академии наук, 2017. С. 230–246.
  16. Скосырев В.А. Концепция «устойчивого авторитаризма» в эпоху Си Цзиньпина. Проблемы Дальнего Востока. 2020. № 2. С. 117–125.
  17. Труш С.М. Внешнеполитический потенциал и движущие факторы внешней политики КНР в оценке американской политологии. Москва: Институт Дальнего Востока АН СССР, 1986. 161 с.
  18. Barhatova, A.S. Osobennosti nauchnyh i obrazovatel'nyh centrov po kitaevedeniyu v SSHA [Features of scientific and educational centers for Chinese studies in the USA]. Innovacii. Nauka. Obrazovanie. 2021. No. 34. P. 89–97.
  19. Bereznyj, L.A. Postmodernizm i problemy orientalistiki. Zametki ob odnoi diskussii sinologov SShA [Postmodernism and problems of Orientalism. Notes on a discussion between US sinologists] (In Russ.). Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost. 2004. No. 2. P. 146–158.
  20. Fewsmith, J. Rethinking Chinese politics. Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York, NY: Boston University, Cambridge University Press, 2021.
  21. Fewsmith, J., Nathan, A.J. Authoritarian Resilience Revisited. Journal of Contemporary China. September 23, 2018.
  22. Li Cheng. Chinese Politics in the Xi Jinping Era: reassessing collective leadership. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. 2016.
  23. Nathan, A.J. Authoritarian Resilience. Journal of Democracy. 14(1). 2003.
  24. Nathan, A.J., Zhang, B. ‘A Shared Future for Mankind’: Rhetoric and Reality in Chinese Foreign Policy under Xi Jinping. Journal of Contemporary China. 2022, 31(133). P. 57–71.
  25. Portyakov, V.Ya. Vremia sobirat' kamni: ob obobshchaiushchikh angloiazychnykh trudakh po vneshnei politike Kitaia [Time to collect stones: about generalizing English–language works on Chinese foreign policy]. 70 let sovremennomu kitaiskomu gosudarstvu: Materialy ezhegodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii Centra politicheskikh issledovanii i prognozov IDV RAN, Moskva, 20–22 marta 2019 goda. (In Russ.) Moscow, Institute of Far Eastern Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2019. P. 201–208.
  26. Rumyancev, E.N. O nekotorykh amerikanskikh vzgliadakh na Kitai [On some American views on China]. Social'no-politicheskaia situatsiia nakanune XIX s"ezda KPK: Materialy ezhegodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii Centra politicheskikh issledovanii i prognozov IDV RAN, Moskva, 15–17 marta 2017 goda (In Russ.). Institut Dal'nego Vostoka Rossijskoj akademii nauk, Centr nauchnoj informacii i dokumentacii. Moskow, Institute of Far Eastern Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2017. P. 230–246.
  27. Shambaugh, D. China’s Communist Party. Atrophy and Adaptation. University of California Press. 2008.
  28. Shambaugh, D. China’s Future. Cambridge: Polity Press. 2016.
  29. Skosyrev, V.A. Konceptsiia "ustoichivogo avtoritarizma" v epokhu Si Czin'pina [The concept of "authoritarian resilience" in the era of Xi Jinping] (In Russ.). Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka. 2020. No. 2. P. 117–125.
  30. Trush, S.M. Vneshnepoliticheskii potentsial i dvizhushchie faktory vneshnei politiki KNR v ocenke amerikanskoj politologii [Foreign policy potential and driving factors of Chinese foreign policy in the assessment of American political science] (In Russ.). Moscow, Institute of Far Eastern Studies of the Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union. 1986. 161 p.

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies