The Evolution of U.S. Republican and Democratic Party Approaches to Climate Agenda: Late 1990s to 2023

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article focuses on analyzing the reasons behind the differing approaches of the Republican and Democratic parties to the issue of climate change. Party positions on this matter significantly influence the development of economic and energy policies in the U.S. Furthermore, the U.S.'s involvement in international efforts to combat global warming is also shaped by the power dynamics between these parties in the presidential administration and Congress. These stances directly impact other vital aspects of U.S. economy and politics, particularly in areas such as energy and Washington's role in international endeavors to achieve net-zero emissions. The climate agenda has become a significant point of contention in EU-US relations, a topic that holds particular relevance today. The findings of the study indicate an increasing partisan divide on the climate agenda, signifying deepening divisions in American society as the 2024 presidential election approaches.

About the authors

Eugenia E. Prokopchuk

Centre for Comprehensive European and International Studies (CCEIS), HSE University

Email: e.e.prokopchuk@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-919 9-3567
Scopus Author ID: 57217036379
ResearcherId: AFM-8763-2022
Analyst, Centre for Comprehensive European and International Studies Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Kelly, L., Gangitano, A. Europe relaxes after US midterms, but fears of a 2024 Trump win run high. The Hill. 12.11.2022. Available at: https://thehill.com/policy/3731485-europe-relaxes-after-us-midterms-but-fears-of-a-2024-trump-win-runhigh/ (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  2. Wethe, D. The Shale Revolution. Bloomberg. 27.12.2019. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/quicktake/fracking#:~:text=Fracking%2C%20or%20hydraulic%20fracturing%2C%20was,or%20gas%20trapped%20inside%20escapes. (accessed: 13.06.2023).
  3. Ellerbeck, S. A record share of US electricity comes from zero-carbon sources - but more work is needed. World Economic Forum. 9.l03.2023. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/03/us-electricity-energy-carbon-renewables/ (accessed: 13.06.2023).
  4. Inflation Reduction Act Guidebook. The White House. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/cleanenergy/inflation-reduction-act-guidebook/ (accessed: 13.06.2023).
  5. Natural gas explained. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/natural-gas/where-our-natural-gas-comesfrom.php#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20now%20produces,the%20highest%20annual%20amount%20recorded. (accessed: 13.06.2023).
  6. Natural gas explained. Natural gas and the environment. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/natural-gas/natural-gas-and-the-environment.php (accessed: 13.06.2023).
  7. Gardner, T., Renshaw, J. Biden admin works on 'green' natural gas as U.S. vies for top LNG spot. Reuters. 3.03.2023. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/biden-admin-works-green-natural-gas-us-vies-top-lng-spot-2023-03-03/ (accessed: 13.06.2023).
  8. Khatsenkova, S. Fact check: Is Europe the only part of the world that has reduced its greenhouse gas emissions? Euronews. 17.05.2023. Available at: https://www.euronews.com/green/2023/05/17/fact-check-is-europe-the-only-part-of-the-worldthat-has-reduced-its-greenhouse-gas-emissi (accessed: 13.06.2023).
  9. Plumer, B. Obama says fracking can be a ‘bridge’ to a clean-energy future. It’s not that simple. The Washington Post. 29.01.2014. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/01/29/obama-says-fracking-offers-a-bridge-toa-clean-energy-future-its-not-that-simple/ (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  10. Palin sticks to the familiar in first solo outing. NBC News. 14.09.2008. Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna26693683 (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  11. Aizarani, J. Lobbying spending of oil & gas companies in the United States during election cycles from 1990 to 2022, by receiving political party. Statista. 31.01.2023. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/788056/us-oil-and-gas-lobbyingspend-by-party/ (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  12. Miller, E. Green energy interests boosted Biden, Dems. OpenSecrets. Available at: https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2020/12/green-energy-2020-boosted-dems/(accessed: 14.06.2023).
  13. Al Gore (The Nobel Prize 2007). The Nobel Prize. Available at: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/2007/gore/facts/ (accessed: 25.07.2023).
  14. ExxonMobil tried to censor climate scientists to Congress during Bush era. The Guardian. 25.05.2016. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/may/25/exxonmobil-climate-change-scientists-congress-george-w-bush (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  15. Foreso, C.F. U.S. Becoming a Leading Exporter of Petroleum Products. USITC Executive Briefings on Trade. December, 2014. Available at: https://www.usitc.gov/research_and_analysis/documents/foreso_petroleum_products-12-1-14_final_0.pdf (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  16. The United States exported more natural gas than it imported in 2017. U.S. Energy Information Administration. 19.03.2018. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=35392 (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  17. Inflation Reduction Act Guidebook. The White House. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/cleanenergy/inflation-reduction-act-guidebook/ (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  18. S.Res.98 - A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the conditions for the United States becoming a signatory to any international agreement on greenhouse gas emissions under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Congress.gov. 12.06.1997. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/senate-resolution/98 (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  19. The Evolution of Byrd. living on earth. 2.07.2010. Available at: https://www.loe.org/shows/segments.html?programID=10-P13-00027HYPERLINK "https://www.loe.org/shows/segments.html?programID=10-P13-00027&"&segmentID=4 (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  20. Hananel, S. Climate Deniers in the 116th Congress. CAP Action. 28.01.2019. Available at: https://www.americanprogressaction.org/article/climate-deniers-116th-congress/ (дата обращения: 14.06.2023).
  21. Climate Deniers in the 117th Congress. CAP Action. 30.03.2021. Available at: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/climate-deniers-117th-congress/ (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  22. Yohe, G. GOP-controlled House: Children playing poorly in the climate change sandbox. The Hill. 22.11.2022. Available at: https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/3746950-gop-controlled-house-children-playing-poorly-in-the-climatechange-sandbox/ (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  23. Bledsoe, P. Democrats must embrace shale gas boom to win elections and climate battle USA Today. 21.04.2018. Available at: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/04/21/democrats-embrace-shale-boom-win-climatebattle-column/533277002/ (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  24. Elkind, E. GOP urged to denounce ‘alarmist’ UN climate change report. Fox News. 8.04.2023. Available at: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-lawmakersun-report-climate-change (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  25. Banerjee, N., Cushman, J.H., Hasemyer, D., Song, L. Exxon: The Road Not Taken. Inside Climate News, 2015. 92 p.
  26. Burnham, A., Han, J., Clark, C.E., Wang, M., Dunn, J.B., Palou-Rivera, I. Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Shale Gas, Natural Gas, Coal, and Petroleum. Environmental Science & Technology. 2012. Vol. 46. No. 2. P. 619-627. Available at: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es201942m (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  27. Dunlap, R.E., McCright, A.M. A Widening Gap: Republican and Democratic Views on Climate Change. Environment. 2008. September/October. P. 7-11. Available at: https://cssn.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/A_Widening_Gap_Republican_and_Democratic_Views_on_.pdf (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  28. Goodman, S., Baudu, P., Sikorsky, E., Femia, F. Climate Change as A “Threat Multiplier”: History, Uses And Future of the Concept. Center for Climate and Security. 3.01.2023. No. 38. 35 p. Available at: https://councilonstrategicrisks.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/38-CCThreatMultiplier.pdf (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  29. McCright, A.M., Dunlap, R.E. Anti-reflexivity. Theory, Culture & Society. 2010. Vol. 27. No. 2–3. P. 100-133. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0263276409356001 (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  30. Moore, T.G. Don’t Know? Won’t Tell? The White House and Kyoto. Stanford University.1998. Available at: https://web.stanford.edu/~moore/CostsofKyoto.html (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  31. Storrow, B. U.S. Renewable Energy Will Surge Past Coal and Nuclear by Year’s End. Scientific American. 22.11.2022. Available at: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/u-s-renewable-energy-will-surge-pastcoal-and-nuclear-by-years-end/ (accessed: 13.06.2023).
  32. The Environment: A Cleaner, Safer Healthier America. The Lunz Research Company. 2003. P. 131-146. Available at: https://www.sourcewatch.org/images/4/45/LuntzResearch. Memo.pdf (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  33. Tyson, A., Funk, C., Kennedy, B. What the data says about Americans’ views of climate change. Pew Research Center. 18.04.2023. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/04/18/for-earth-day-key-facts-about-americans-viewsof-climate-change-and-renewable-energy/ (accessed: 14.06.2023).
  34. Webster, J. The Inflation Reduction Act’s impact on the US oil and gas industry. Atlantic Council. 31.10.2022. Available at: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/energysource/the-inflation-reduction-acts-impact-on-the-us-oil-and-gas-industry/ (accessed: 14.06.2023).

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies