International exchanges as an instrument of american public diplomacy

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

It has become clear that the development of international situation will be determined by several trends: transformation of the world order, crisis of American global leadership and confrontation between the great powers. All three are intertwined since the primary reason for confrontation is the disagreement between the great powers about how they envision the future of world order: as continuation of “rule-based order” with American leadership or as a new model, for instance, a multipolar world. Thus, the importance of methods aimed at influencing international public opinion, such as public diplomacy (PD), has increased significantly. Among the U.S. PD instruments international exchanges have always been the “crown jewel” - a slow long-term but nevertheless effective strategic tool used to gradually create a dominating global worldview beneficial for American national interests. This article examines the place the international exchanges hold within the systemic organization of the U.S. PD, identifies the main types of exchanges as well as three key focus-groups of their target audiences. Applying the transformative education’s theory author analyzes the mechanics of influence projected via the exchanges. At the end, putting together American PD systemic crisis and recent negative trends concerning participation in exchanges the article concludes that further monitoring will be required in the future.

About the authors

Uliana Z. Artamonova

Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: artamonova.u@imemo.ru
Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Артамонова У.З. 2021. Публичная дипломатия США "без лица" (кадровый кризис постбиполярной эпохи). Мировая экономика и международные отношения. Т. 65. № 12. С. 33-39. doi: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-12-33-39
  2. Корнетов Г.Б. 2018. Восхождение к преобразующей педагогике. Историко-педагогический журнал. №4. С. 62-91.
  3. Крысько В.Г. 1999. Секреты психологической войны (цели, задачи, методы, формы, опыт). Минск. Харвест. 446 с.
  4. Прохоренко И.Л. 2015. Пространственный подход в исследовании международных отношений. Москва. ИМЭМО РАН. 111 с.
  5. Цветкова Н.А. 2007. Оценка эффективности международной образовательной политики СССР и США в годы холодной войны. 200 лет российско-американским отношениям: наука и образование. Ред. А. Чубарьян, Б. Рубл. Москва: ОЛМА Медиа Групп. С. 378-394.
  6. Яковлев А.Н. Большевизм - социальная болезнь XX века: Вступительная статья. 1999. Куртуа С. и др. Чёрная книга коммунизма. Москва: Издательство "Три века истории". С. 5-32.
  7. Burnett, S.H. 1988. U.S. Informational and Cultural Programs. In: Staar R. (ed.) Public Diplomacy: USA versus USSR. Stanford CA, Hoover Institution Press. P. 69-95.
  8. Clark, M.C., Wilson A.L. 1991. Context and Rationality in Mezirow's Theory of Transformational Learning. Adult Education Quarterly. № 41. P. 75-91.
  9. Custer, S. (ed.) 2022. Reputational Security: The Imperative to Reinvest in America's Strategic Communications Capabilities. Williamsburg, VA. AidData at William & Mary. 350 p.
  10. Espinosa, J.M. 1976.Inter-American Beginnings of U.S. Cultural Diplomacy, 1936-1948. Cultural Relations Programs of the U.S. Department of State: Historical Studies. Volume 2. Washington, D.C. Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs U.S. Department of State. 360 p.
  11. Fisher, A. 2013. Collaborative Public Diplomacy (Global Public Diplomacy). Palgrave. 256 p.
  12. Johnson, L.R. 2018. The Fulbright Program and the philosophy and geography of US exchange programs since World War II. In.: Tournès L., Scott-Smith G. (eds.) Global Exchanges. Scholarships and Transnational Circulations in the Modern World. New York - Oxford, Berghahn. Р. 173-187.
  13. Kirkgoz,Y. 2017. Exploring the Impact of the Fulbright Foreign Language Teaching Assistant Program on Grantees' Educational and Cultural Beliefs and Practices. In: Mathews-Aydinli J. (eds.) International Education Exchanges and Intercultural Understanding. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. P. 131-156. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-43829-0_9
  14. Pipes, R. 2015. Alexander Yakovlev: The Man Whose Ideas Delivered Russia from Communism. DeKalb, IL. NIU Press. 151 p
  15. Rugh, W. 2014. Front Line Public Diplomacy. How US Embassies Communicate with Foreign Publics. Palgrave Macmillan US. 276 p.
  16. Scott-Smith, G. 2008. Mapping the Undefinable: Some Thoughts on the Relevance of Exchange Programs within International Relations Theory. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Vol. 616. P. 173-195.
  17. Ward, I.A. 1947. The Fulbright Act. Far Eastern Survey. Vol. 16 (17). P. 198-200

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies