Perioperative infusion therapy

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Perioperative infusion support of surgical patients is the main and non-alternative element of treatment.

At the same time, the tactics of infusion therapy continues to be the subject of study. Ideas about the optimal quantitative and qualitative composition of the fluid transfused to patients are being revised as ideas about the pathogenesis of critical conditions evolve. The basis of pathogenetic analysis of compensatory hemodynamic capabilities, as a point of application of infusion treatment, previously consisted mainly of invasive monitoring techniques, replaced in recent years by the control of routine parameters with proven high correlation with invasive ones. In current studies devoted to the problems of infusion correction of hemodynamic abnormalities, the most discussed issues are the applicability of isotonic and balanced polyionic crystalloids, less often colloidal solutions in various clinical situations, and the results of such studies do not always allow to unambiguously determine the choice of infusion media, and sometimes simply incomparable. Some researchers advocate the use of isotonic crystalloids, some works prove the best effectiveness of balanced salt solutions. With the volumes of treatment corresponding to the perioperative period, in most studies there are no differences in the effectiveness of the main composite groups of crystalloids at all. We see the reason for this in the peculiarities of randomization methods, when statistical limitations do not allow us to avoid discrete data analysis: their comparative grouping occurs according to the principle of selecting a target parameter, and all the others are classified as auxiliary or secondary. It seems to us that the involvement of arrays of data obtained in real clinical practice as a result of a combination of local theoretical and empirical ideas about corrective treatment regimens correlated with their effectiveness could smooth out the inconsistency of the results of such studies, especially since clinicians have a sample with a volemic load at their disposal, allowing them to predict the hemodynamic reaction of the patient's body to infusion and a set of routine parameters for more fine-tuning of therapy.

In anesthesiological and resuscitation practice, there is an opinion of the currently popular empirical-evidence plan that balanced salt solutions are preferable to isotonic solutions with a higher degree of severity of patients, but this opinion is not a priori and requires additional research to verify the choice.

About the authors

Evgeny I. Skobelev

Central State Medical Academy of Department of Presidential Affairs

Author for correspondence.
Email: 89037778864@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2815-5277
SPIN-code: 8951-9550

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Igor N. Pasechnik

Central State Medical Academy of Department of Presidential Affairs

Email: pasigor@ya.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8121-4160
SPIN-code: 4433-1418

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Connor JM, Coopersmith CM. Does crystalloid composition or rate of fluid administration make a difference when resuscitating patients in the ICU? JAMA. 2021. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.11119
  2. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al.; Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1368–1377. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010307
  3. Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, et al.; ProCESS Investigators. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(18):1683–1693. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401602
  4. Rossaint R, Bouillon B, Cerny V, et al. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fourth edition. Crit Care. 2016;20:100. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1265-x
  5. Pasechnik IN, Funny IA, Timashkov DA, et al. Planned surgical intervention and oral loading with carbohydrates. Surgery Magazine Named After N.I. Pirogov. 2020;(6):82–89. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202006182
  6. Funny IA, Pasechnik IN, Skobelev EI, et al. Optimization of infusion therapy in planned abdominal surgery. General Resuscitation. 2018;14(5):4–15. (In Russ). doi: 10.15360/1813-9779-2018-5-4-15
  7. Weil MH, Henning RJ. New concepts in the diagnosis and fluid treatment of circulatory shock. In: 13th annual becton, dickinson and company oscar schwidetsky memorial lecture. Anesth Analg. 1979;58(2):124–132.
  8. Vincent JL, Weil MH. Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(5):1333–1337. doi: 1097/01.CCM.0000214677.76535.A5
  9. Heenen S, De Backer D, Vincent JL. How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted? Crit Care. 2006;10(4):R102. doi: 10.1186/cc4970
  10. Aya HD, Ster IC, Fletcher N, et al. Pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(5):880–891. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001517
  11. Aya HD, Rhodes A, Chis SI, et al. Hemodynamic effect of different doses of fluids for a fluid challenge: a quasi-randomized controlled study. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(2):e161–168. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002067
  12. Toscani L, Aya HD, Antonakaki D, et al. What is the impact of the fluid challenge technique on diagnosis of fluid responsiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1796-9
  13. Biais M, De CH, Lanchon R, et al. Mini-fluid challenge of 100 ml of crystalloid predicts fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesthesiology. 2017;127(3):450–456. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001753
  14. Jozwiak M, Mercado P, Teboul JL, et al. What is the lowest change in cardiac output that transthoracic echocar-diography can detect? Crit Care. 2019;23(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2413-x
  15. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(3):486–552. doi: 10.1097/CCM. 0000000000002255
  16. Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, et al.; SAFE Study Investigators. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(22):2247–2256. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040232
  17. Chowdhury AH, Cox EF, Francis ST, Lobo DN. A randomized, controlled, double-blind crossover study on the effects of 2-L infusions of 0.9% saline and Plasma-Lyte® 148 on renal blood flow velocity and renal cortical tissue perfusion in healthy volunteers. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):18–24. doi: 10. 1097/SLA.0b013e318256be72
  18. Young P, Bailey M, Beasley R, et al.; SPLIT Investigators; ANZICS CTG. Effect of a buffered crystalloid solution vs saline on acute kidney injury among patients in the intensive care unit: the SPLIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(16):1701–1710. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12334
  19. Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP, et al.; SMART Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(9):829–839. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711584
  20. Zampieri FG, Machado FR, Biondi RS, et al.; BaSICS investigators and BRICNet members. Effect of intravenous fluid treatment with a balanced solution vs 0.9% saline solution on mortality in critically ill patients: the BaSICS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;326(9): 1–12. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.11684
  21. Zampieri FG, Machado FR, Biondi RS, et al.; BaSICS investigators and BRICNet members. Effect of slower vs faster intravenous fluid bolus rates on mortality in critically ill patients: the BaSICS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;326(9):830–838. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.11444
  22. Shaw AD, Bagshaw SM, Goldstein SL, et al. Major complications, mortality, and resource utilization after open abdominal surgery: 0.9% saline compared to Plasma-Lyte. Ann Surg. 2012;255(5): 821–829. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825074f5
  23. Yunos NM, Bellomo R, Hegarty C, et al. Association between a chloride-liberal vs chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults. JAMA. 2012;308(15):1566–1572. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.13356
  24. Krajewski ML, Raghunathan K, Paluszkiewicz SM, et al. Meta- analysis of high-versus low-chloride content in perioperative and critical care fluid resuscitation. Br J Surg. 2015;102(1):24–36. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9651

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. Variants of left ventricular function curves with high (1), normal (2) and reduced (3) hemodynamic compensation reserves.

Download (606KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Skobelev E.I., Pasechnik I.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies