Comparative analysis of resilience indicators depending on the type of locus of control in medical students

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Background. Modern medical education is associated with a high level of stress, which requires medical students to have well-developed adaptive resources. Resilience, as an integral characteristic of personality, contributes to the successful overcoming of difficulties and the preservation of psychological health. An important factor influencing the formation of resilience is the locus of control, which determines a person's tendency to attribute responsibility for events to internal or external factors.

Purpose. To study the relationship between the level of resilience and the type of locus of control in medical students.

Materials and methods. The study involved 102 medical university students aged 18 to 25 years (mean age – 21.3±1.8 years). To identify traumatic events, a Semi-Structured Questionnaire for Traumatic Events (N.L. Bundalo) was used, allowing for an objective assessment of the presence and characteristics of traumatic events in the respondents' history. The Brief Resilience Scale (E.N. Osin, E.I. Rasskazova) was used to assess resilience. The locus of control was determined using the "Locus of Control" methodology (E.G. Ksenofontova).

Results. A comparative analysis of resilience indicators among respondents in groups with internal and external loci of control using the Mann-Whitney U test revealed statistically significant differences. Respondents with an internal locus of control exhibited higher resilience than those with an external locus. It was found that students with an internal locus of control demonstrate a more conscious attitude towards life compared to externals. They also show a higher level of all components of resilience – engagement, control, and risk acceptance. Correlation analysis revealed a positive statistically significant relationship between resilience and the internal and negative with the external type of locus of control. The identified patterns indicate the important role of the locus of control in adaptation processes. A promising direction seems to be the creation of differentiated programs aimed at developing an internal position as a basis for professional resilience in students of medical specialties.

Авторлар туралы

Nina Vishnyakova

Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: vishnina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6173-0638

Candidate of Psychology Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Clinical Psychology and Pedagogy Department

 

Ресей, 1, Partizan Zheleznyak Str., Krasnoyarsk, 660022, Russian Federation

Irina Loginova

Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University

Email: loginova70_70@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9551-1457

Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Professor of Clinical Psychology and Pedagogy Department

 

Ресей, 1, Partizan Zheleznyak Str., Krasnoyarsk, 660022, Russian Federation

Elena Malutkina

Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University

Email: malei59@mail.ru

Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of Clinical Psychology and Pedagogy Department

 

Ресей, 1, Partizan Zheleznyak Str., Krasnoyarsk, 660022, Russian Federation

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Bodrov, V. A. (2006). Psychological stress: Development and overcoming (528 pp.). Moscow: PER SE. ISBN: 5929201463. https://elibrary.ru/SURQNF
  2. Bundalo, N. L. (2009). Chronic posttraumatic stress disorder (352 pp.). Krasnoyarsk: KrasSMU. ISBN: 9785942850746. https://elibrary.ru/QLWHAX
  3. Varaeva, N. V. (2023). The image of modern person in the perceptions of Russian youth. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology, 8(3), 110–145. https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.sep_2023_31_3_05. https://elibrary.ru/TNCKZI
  4. Ksenofontova, E. G. (1999). Study of personality control localization — a new version of the «Level of Subjective Control» technique. Psychological Journal, 20(2), 103–114.
  5. Kurlova, D. V., & Nikiforov, G. S. (2021). Students’ attitude to health depending on their locus of control. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology, 6(3), 98–122. https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.sep_2021_23_3_04. https://elibrary.ru/WILSXF
  6. MalkinaPых, I. G. (2023). Prevention of emotional burnout in healthcare workers. Psychology of Stress and Coping Behavior, 5(2), 112–125.
  7. Osin, E. N., & Rasskazova, E. I. (2013). A short version of the resilience test: Psychometric characteristics and application in an organizational context. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 14. Psychology, 2, 147–165. https://elibrary.ru/QCTPYN
  8. Postylyakova, Yu. V. (2016). Enhancing resourcefulness and resilience of prospective foster parents during training. Organizational Psychology and Labor Psychology, 1(1), 272–283. https://elibrary.ru/XVOZKB
  9. Titova, O. I., & Kholodtseva, E. L. (2017). Resilience as a factor of sociopsychological adaptation of gifted schoolchildren. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology, 2(4), 43–70. https://elibrary.ru/ZXWTPP
  10. Shamionov, R. M. (2022). Locus of control and adaptive strategies of personality under stress. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 14. Psychology, 1, 56–73.
  11. Sheinov, V. P. (2020). Connection between emotional intelligence, locus of control, and life satisfaction. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology, 5(4), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.sep.2020.20.4.006. https://elibrary.ru/JTASBM
  12. Feldman, R. (2020). What is resilience: An affiliative neuroscience approach. World Psychiatry, 19(2), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20729. https://elibrary.ru/SWTIKU
  13. Hickie, I. B. (2022). Implementing 21st century «end to end» and technology enhanced care for young people. World Psychiatry, 21(1), 79–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20928. https://elibrary.ru/KANBJA
  14. Hollis, C. (2022). Youth mental health: Risks and opportunities in the digital world. World Psychiatry, 21(1), 81–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20929. https://elibrary.ru/KJEPKX
  15. Maddi, S., & Khoshaba, D. (2002). Hardiness training for resiliency and leadership. In D. Paton, J. M. Violant, & L. M. Smith (Eds.), Posttraumatic psychological stress: Individual, group and organizational strategies for resilience (pp. 43–58). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
  16. Malla, A., Boksa, P., & Joober, R. (2022). Meeting the challenges of the new frontier of youth mental health care. World Psychiatry, 21(1), 78–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20927. https://elibrary.ru/MIBHKS
  17. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 1–28.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу


Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қол жетімді Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).