Educating future Russian language teachers in the United States

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

The increasing tensions between the Russian Federation and the United States of America have exacerbated the already serious decline in numbers of students seeking to study Russian, as well as the concomitant elimination of many Russian language programs at both the K-12 and university levels. The purpose of the research is to consider the need to improve the preparation and quality of future teachers of Russian in U.S. public schools. This work draws on applied philosophical analysis and policy studies, as well as a review of existing Russian language and literature programs at major U.S. universities. Measures of relevant data are presented, showing a paucity of linguistic competence in Russian produced through current practice in the U.S. Implementation is suggested. A model five-year program is proposed for the preparation of future Russian language teachers in the United States. Based on the typical undergraduate curriculum, this model would involve coursework in three broad areas: general education courses (the liberal arts and sciences), Russian language and related courses, and courses concerned with pedagogy.

Авторлар туралы

Timothy Reagan

University of Maine; University of the Free State

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: timothy.reagan@maine.edu
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5837-1603

Professor, School of Learning and Teaching, University of Maine; research fellow, Department of South African Sign Language and Deaf Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of the Free State

205 Shibles Hall, Orono, Maine 04469, United States of America; 205 Nelson Mandela Drive, Park West, Bloemfontein, Republic of South Africa

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. American Academy of Arts and Sciences. (2017). America’s languages: Investing in language education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA
  2. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2023). World-readiness standards for learning languages: The roadmap to language competence (4th ed.). Alexandria, VA
  3. American Councils for International Education. (2017). The national K-12 foreign language enrollment survey report. Retrieved April 24, 2023, from https://www.americancouncils.org/sites/default/files/FLE-report-June17.pdf
  4. Bakiyevna, R.G. (2021). Use of innovative methods in teaching the Russian language to students of the national group of non-philological universities. European Scholar Journal, 2(5), 129-130. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YVRWS
  5. Barzun, J. (1954). Teacher in America. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books
  6. Bauman, H-D. (2004). Audism: Exploring the metaphysics of oppression. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9(2), 239-246. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enh025
  7. Beaudrie, S., & Fairclough, M. (Eds.). (2012). Spanish as a heritage language in the United States: The state of the field. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1982). Ce que parler veut dire: L’économie des échanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard
  9. Bourdieu, P. (2001). Langage et pouvoir symbolique. Paris: Éditions Points
  10. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1970). La reproduction: Éléments pour une théorie du système d’enseignement. Paris: Éditions de Minuit
  11. Brinton, D., Kagan, O.E., & Bauckus, S. (Eds.). (2008). Heritage language education: A new field emerging. New York: Routledge
  12. Caena, F. (2014). Initial teacher education in Europe: An overview of policy issues. Brussels: European Commission
  13. Coakley, T. (2016). Language at the point of need: The Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center. In S. Berbeco (Ed.), Foreign Language Education in America: Perspectives from K-12, University, Government, and International Learning (pp. 190-209). London: Palgrave Macmillan
  14. Cook, V. (2013). Second language learning and language teaching. London: Routledge
  15. Curtain, H., & Dahlberg, C. (2016). Languages and learners: Making the match. World language instruction in K-8 classrooms and beyond (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson
  16. Davidson, D. (2007). Study abroad and outcomes measurements: The case of Russian. Modern Language Journal, 91(2), 276-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01057.x
  17. Davidson, D. (2010). Study abroad: When, how long, and with what results? New data from the Russian front. Foreign Language Annals, 43(1), 6-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01057.x
  18. Dengub, E., & Nazarova, S. (2021). Этажи: Second year Russian language and culture. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press
  19. Dixon, R. (2016). Are some languages better than others? Oxford: Oxford University Press
  20. Douglas, C., & Jones-Rikkers, C. (2001). Study abroad programs and American student worldmindedness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 13(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1300/J066v13n01_04
  21. Eckert, R., & Rowley, A. (2013). Audism: A theory and practice of audiocentric privilege. Humanity and Society, 37(2), 101-130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597613481731
  22. Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). London: Routledge
  23. Friedman, A. (2015, May 10). America’s lacking language skills. The Atlantic. Retrieved March 13, 2021, from https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/05/filling-americas-language-education-potholes/392876/
  24. Gass, S., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L. (2020). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (5th ed.). New York: Routledge
  25. Herold, F. (2019). Shulman, or Shulman and Shulman? How communities and contexts affect the development of pre-service teachers’ subject knowledge. Teacher Development, 23(4), 488-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2019.1637773
  26. Holian, T.J. (1998). The German-Americans and World War II: An ethnic experience. New York: Peter Lang
  27. Isurin, L., & Ivanova-Sullivan, T. (2008). Lost in between: The case of Russian heritage speakers. Heritage Language Journal, 6(1), 72-103. https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.6.1.4
  28. Johnston, B., & Goettsch, K. (2000). In search of the knowledge base of language teaching: Explanations by experienced teachers. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La revue Canadienne des langue vivantes, 56(3), 437-468. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.56.3.437
  29. Kagan, O.E. (2005). In support of a proficiency-based definition of heritage language learners: The case of Russian. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8(2-3), 213-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050508668608
  30. Kagan, O.E. (2010). Russian heritage language speakers in the U.S.: A profile. Russian Language Journal, 60, 213-228. Retrieved March 13, 2021, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/43669184
  31. Kagan, O.E. (2014). Russian heritage language learners: From students’ profiles to project-based curriculum. In T. Wiley, J. Peyton, D. Christian, S. Moore & Na Liu (Eds.), Handbook of Heritage, Community, and Native American Languages in the United States (pp. 177-185). New York: Routledge, Center for Applied Linguistics
  32. Kagan, O.E., & Dillon, K. (2001). A new perspective on teaching Russian: Focus on the heritage learner. The Slavic and East European Journal, 45(3), 507-518. https://doi.org/10.2167/le797.0
  33. Kansanen, P. (2009). Subject-matter didactics as a central knowledge base for teachers, or should it be called pedagogical content knowledge? Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 17(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360902742845
  34. Kinginger, C. (2011). Enhancing language learning in study abroad. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000031
  35. Kirk-Kuwaye, M., & Sano-Franchini, D. (2015). “Why do I have to take this course?” How academic advisers can help students find personal meaning and purpose in general education. The Journal of General Education, 64(2), 99-105. https://doi.org/10.5325/jgeneeduc.64.2.0099
  36. Kloss, H. (1998). The American bilingual tradition (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics
  37. Koning, P. (2009, February). Using languages in national security. The Language Educator (pp. 32-37). Retrieved March 20, 2019, from https://www.actfl.org/sites/defauult/files/tle/career-focus/TLE_01NatSecure.pdf
  38. Kraemer, A., Merrill, J., & Prestel, D. (2020). Russian programs in the 21st century university: Preparing for the future. In E. Dengub, I. Dubinina & J. Merrill (Eds.), The Art of Teaching Russian: Research, Pedagogy, and Practice (pp. 49-71). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press
  39. Kudyma, A., & Kagan, O.E. (2019). Russian through art: For intermediate to advanced students. New York: Routledge
  40. Laleko, O.V. (2013). Assessing heritage language vitality: Russian in the United States. Heritage Language Journal, 10(3), 382-395. https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.10.3.9
  41. Laleko, O.V., & Miroshnychenko, Y. (2022). Grammars in conflict: A linguistic study of Russian in Brighton Beach, New York. Russian Language Journal, 72(1-2), 171-191.
  42. Laleko, O.V., & Polinsky, M. (2017). Silence is difficult: On missing elements in bilingual grammars. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 36(1), 135-163. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2017-0007
  43. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  44. Leaver, B., & Campbell, C. (2020). The shifting paradigm in Russian language pedagogy: From communicative language teaching to transformative language learning and teaching. In E. Dengub, I. Dubinina & J. Merrill (Eds.), The Art of Teaching Russian: Research, Pedagogy, and Practice (pp. 147-162). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press
  45. Lee, J., & Van Patten, B. (2003). Making communicative language teaching happen (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill
  46. Looney, D., & Lusin, N. (2018). Enrollments in languages other than English in United States institutions of higher education, Summer 2016 and Fall 2016: Preliminary report. Modern Language Association. Retrieved April 24, 2023, from https://www.mla.org/content/download/83540/file/2016-Enrollments-Short-Report.pdf#:~:text=SINCE%201958%2C%20the%20Modern%20Language%20Association%20%28MLA%29%20has,the%20MLA%20has%20gathered%20data%20on%20summer%20enrollments
  47. Martin, C. (2020). Looking back, moving forward: Teaching and learning Russian in the United States in the post-Soviet era. In E. Dengub, I. Dubinina & J. Merrill (Eds.), The Art of Teaching Russian: Research, Pedagogy, and Practice (pp. 23-48). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press
  48. May, S., & Wright, N. (2007). Secondary literacy across the curriculum: Challenges and possibilities. Language and Education, 21(5), 370-376. https://doi.org/10.2167/le797.0
  49. Mayr, A. (Ed.). (2008). Language and power: An introduction to institutional discourse. London: Continuum.
  50. McLeod, M., & Wainwright, P. (2009). Researching the study abroad experience. Journal of Studies in International Education, 13(1), 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315308317219
  51. Minkov, M., Kagan, O.E., Protassova, E., & Schwartz, M. (2019). Towards a better understanding of a continuum of heritage language proficiency: The case of adolescent Russian heritage speakers. Heritage Language Journal, 16(2), 211-237. https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.16.2.5
  52. Mulcahy, D. (2008). The educated person: Toward a new paradigm for liberal education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  53. Nasiba, N. (2022). Modern methods of teaching Russian as a foreign language. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research, 11(5), 358-362. https://doi.org/10.5958/2278-4853.2022.00136.7
  54. National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project. (1996). Standards for foreign language learning: Preparing for the 21st century. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press.
  55. National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project. (2006). Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century: Including Arabic, Chinese, Classical Languages, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Russian, and Spanish (3rd ed.). Lawrence, KS: Allen Press
  56. Ndyay, M., Nguyen, W., & Grunina, E. O. (2020). Innovative technologies in teaching Russian as a foreign language. Russian Language Studies, 18(1), 7-38. https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2020-18-1-7-38
  57. Neuman, W. (2017, May 18). Setting aside bureaucratic requirements. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved September 24, 2021, from https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2017/05/18/undergraduate-foreign-language-requirements-arent-particularly-effective-essay
  58. Omagio Hadley, A. (2001). Teaching language in context (3rd ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle
  59. Phillips, J., & Abbott, M. (2011). A decade of foreign language standards: Impact, influence, and future directions. Report of Grant Project #P017A080037, Title VII, International Research Studies, U.S. Department of Education to the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. Retrieved July 20, 2023, from https://www.actfl.org/uploads/files/general/NationalStandards2011.pdf
  60. Reagan, T. (2022a). Democracy and world language education: Toward a transformation. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing
  61. Reagan, T. (2022b). Remembering Boris Badenov and Natasha Fatale: Teaching the “language of the enemy” in U.S. public schools. Journal of Educational Foundations, 35(1), 129-147
  62. Reagan, T. (2023). The language of Pushkin, the language of Putin: Teaching Russian in the United States. American Journal of Education and Practice, 7(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajep.1374
  63. Reagan, T., & Osborn, T.A. (2021). World language education as critical pedagogy: The promise of social justice. New York: Routledge.
  64. Richard-Amato, P. (2010). Making it happen: From interactive to participatory language teaching. Evolving theory and practice (4th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Longman.
  65. Rifkin, B., Dengub, E., & Nazarova, S. (2017). Панорама/Panorama: Intermediate Russian language and culture. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  66. Schwab, R., DeFranco, T., & McGivney-Burelle, J. (2004). Preparing future teacher-leaders: Experiences from the University of Connecticut’s five-year teacher education program. Educational Perspectives, 36(1-2), 20-25
  67. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  68. Shutova, M.N., & Orekhova, I.A. (2018). Phonetics in teaching Russian as a foreign language. Russian Language Studies, 16(3), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2018-16-3-261-278
  69. Smyth, S., & Crosbie, E. (2002). Rus’: A comprehensive course in Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  70. Trudgill, P. (2016). Dialect matters: Respecting vernacular language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  71. Truxaw, M., Casa, T., & Adelson, J. (2011). A stance toward inquiry: An investigation of preservice teachers’ confidence regarding educational inquiry. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(4), 69-95. Retrieved March 13, 2021, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23479631
  72. Wardhaugh, R. (1999). Proper English: Myths and misunderstandings about language. Oxford: Blackwell
  73. Wingate, U. (2018). Academic literacy across the curriculum: Towards a collaborative instructional approach. Language Teaching, 51(3), 349-364. https://doi.org/10.1017/S02614448160000264
  74. Wodak, R. (2012). Language, power and identity. Language Teaching, 45(2), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000048
  75. Yue, Y. (2017). Teaching Chinese in K-12 schools in the United States: What are the challenges? Foreign Language Annals, 50(3), 601-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12277
  76. Zhou, M. (2011). Globalization and language order: Teaching Chinese as a foreign language in the United States. In L. Tsung & K. Cruuickshank (Eds.), Teaching and learning Chinese in global contexts (pp. 131-149). London: Continuum

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».