The origins, current issues, and prospects of communicative cultural linguistics
- Авторлар: Vorobyev V.V.1, Sknarev D.S.1, Tagaev M.D.2
-
Мекемелер:
- RUDN University
- Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University named after Boris Yeltsin
- Шығарылым: Том 23, № 1 (2025)
- Беттер: 7-21
- Бөлім: Cultural Linguistics: Theoretical and Applied Aspects
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2618-8163/article/view/324734
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2025-23-1-7-21
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UXYJVI
- ID: 324734
Дәйексөз келтіру
Аннотация
Integration is characteristic feature of modern sciences. It implies interpenetration, synthesis of knowledge, and unification of several sciences. A prominent example here is communicative cultural linguistics, an avant-garde direction that requires theoretical and practical justification. Many Russian linguistic studies are devoted to the interaction of language, culture, and communication; this undoubtedly indicates the relevance of this issue. This relevance of our research is conditioned by the need to justify communicative cultural linguistics as an independent scientific direction. The relevance of the study is also lies in the need of studying new areas of modern linguistics and conducting interdisciplinary research on the relationship between culture, language, and communication. The aim of the study is to formulate and develop the theoretical frameworks of communicative cultural linguistics, to justify it, and to determine its origins, current issues, and prospects. Modern linguistic articles on language, culture, and communication specifics serve as the material for this research. The main research methods are analysis and synthesis, explanatory description, generalization, characteristics of entities, continuous sampling of language means of creating advertising images in internet texts. The research focuses on communicative cultural linguistics as an avant-garde and promising direction of modern linguistics. This area of scientific knowledge is only outlining the main directions, determining its specifics, and forming its terminological apparatus. The authors conclude that cultural linguistics of Internet communication and cultural linguistics of advertising are the popular varieties of communicative cultural linguistics. The authors consider works on tourist Internet discourse to be promising. In this sense, online travel guidebooks and travel blogs are the most popular tourist Internet communication genres; they present the most important information about the country culture, mentality, etc. Their main task is to intrigue Internet users and build a certain “catchy” advertising image in the minds of readers in order to attract them as a target audience.
Авторлар туралы
Vladimir Vorobyev
RUDN University
Email: vorobyev_vv@pfur.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5906-3773
SPIN-код: 4432-6056
Scopus Author ID: 57197807156
ResearcherId: AAT-1847-2020
Doctor of Philology, Professor, Head of Russian Language and Linguoculturology Department
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198, Russian FederationDmitry Sknarev
RUDN University
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: sknarev_ds@pfur.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9404-8421
SPIN-код: 4341-5566
Scopus Author ID: 57195757403
ResearcherId: G-9777-2016
Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Professor of Russian Language and Linguoculturology Department
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198, Russian FederationMamed Tagaev
Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University named after Boris Yeltsin
Email: mamed_tagaev@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3743-4713
SPIN-код: 8544-1419
ResearcherId: KEJ-3528-2024
Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Director of the Russian Language Institute named after A.O. Orusbaeva
44 Chui Avenue, Bishkek, 720022, Kyrgyz RepublicӘдебиет тізімі
- Alefirenko, N. F. (2014). Modern Problems of Language Science. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.).
- Bugaiski, M. (2010). Language of Communication. Kharkov: Humanitarian Center Publ. (In Russ.).
- Fanakova, L. V. (2013). Pragmatic features of the familiar style of communication in Russian and American communicative cultures. [Author’s abstr. cand. philol. diss.]. Ekaterinburg. (In Russ.). EDN: ZOVDLP
- Garaeva, L. M. (2015). Language means of verbal aggression of professional subcultures: based on the Russian and English languages. (Candidate dissertation, Kazan). (In Russ.). EDN: NMQIWS
- Glukhova, O. V. (2010). Onomastic and linguacultural characteristics of verbal trademarks: based on the Russian and English languages. (Candidate dissertation, Rostov-on-Don). (In Russ.). EDN: QEPYYV
- Gur’eva, Z. I. (2003). Speech communication in business: towards the creation of an integrative theory: based on texts in Russian and English. (Doctoral dissertation, Krasnodar). (In Russ.). EDN: NMPJKZ
- Kardanova, A. K. (2017). Communication as an ethnolinguocultural communicative category: based on the Russian, English and Kabardino-Circassian languages. (Candidate dissertation, Nalchik). (In Russ.). EDN: KGDMVJ
- Khalupo, O. I. (2016). Linguocultural aspects of interaction of subjects of national communicative spaces. (Doctoral dissertation, Ufa). (In Russ.). EDN: ZBRIVR
- Leontovich, O. A. (2002). System-dynamic model of intercultural communication between Russians and Americans. (Doctoral dissertation, Volgograd). (In Russ.). EDN: QDUBKT
- Mamontov, A. S., Boguslavskaya, V. V., & Ratnikova, A. G. (2024). The concept of creating a nationally oriented linguistic and cultural educational dictionary for Vietnamese citizens. Russian Language Studies, 22(2), 157–170. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/ 10.22363/2618-8163-2024-22-2-157-170 EDN: HXCHET
- Maslova, V. A. (2018). Main trends and principles of modern linguistics. Russian Language Studies, 16(2), 172–190. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2264-2018-16-2-172-190 EDN: UOQEXN
- Maslova, V. A. (2008). Modern trends in linguistics. Moscow: Academy Publ. (In Russ.). EDN: THHCFT
- Mel’nikov, A. S. (2004). Lingvocultural aspects of planned international languages: against the background of ethnic languages. (Doctoral dissertation, Cheboksary). (In Russ.). EDN: NNROAH
- Nikitina, T. G., & Rogaleva, E. I. (2024). Innovative techniques of linguacultural representation of Russian phraseological units in the dictionary for foreign-language students. Russian Language Studies, 22(2), 171–189. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/ 10.22363/2618-8163-2024-22-2-171-189 EDN: QBIULR
- Privalova, I. V. (2005). Interculture and verbal language (linguacognitive foundations of intercultural communication). Moscow: Gnosis Publ. (In Russ.). EDN: TVMZTN
- Sapozhnikova, E. E. (2004). Comparative analysis of national and cultural features of the language of business communication: based on negotiations in English, Spanish and Russian. [Author’s abstr. cand. philol. diss.]. Moscow (In Russ.). EDN: ZMTPWL
- Shaklein, V. M., & Kovtunenko, I. V. (2023). Russian blogosphere: pragmatic and linguocultural specifics of the implementation of the category of coherence. Moscow: Flinta Publ. (In Russ.).
- Sun, J. (2024). Compliment as a speech tactic in Chinese and Russian. (Candidate dissertation, Dushanbe). (In Russ.). EDN: ENVSYP
- Tokarev, G. V. (2020). Fundamentals of linguoculturology. Tula: Tula Production Printing Association Publ. (In Russ.). EDN: JYYRJM
- Trofimova, G. N. (2004). Language taste of the Internet era in Russia: functioning of the Russian language on the Internet: conceptual and essential dominants. Moscow: RUDN Publ. (In Russ.). EDN: QRIJSV
- Veselovskaya, T. S. (2017). Features of Linguistic and Communicative Competence of a Native Russian Speaker in Intercultural Communication (Based on Self-Description). (Candidate dissertation, Moscow). (In Russ.).
- Volkova, E. V. (2007). Linguocultural Barriers of Computer-Mediated Communication. (Candidate dissertation, Ulyanovsk). (In Russ.). EDN: TAZAJB
- Vorob’ev, V. V., Zakirova, E. S., & Sknarev, D. S. (2023). Linguoculturology and Professional Communication. Moscow: Russkii yazyk. Kursy Publ. (In Russ.).
- Zykova, I. V. (2017). Meta-language of linguoculurology: constants and variants. Moscow: Gnosis Publ. (In Russ.). EDN: ZRFXSB
Қосымша файлдар
