Economic and Natural Factors of Spatial Heterogeneity of Forest Carbon Emissions in Russia in the 2010s
- 作者: Pyzhev А.1,2,3
-
隶属关系:
- Siberian Federal University
- Center for Forest Ecology and Productivity, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS
- 期: 卷 87, 编号 4 (2023)
- 页面: 637-648
- 栏目: ЭКОНОМИКА И РЫНКИ РЕЗУЛЬТАТОВ ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЯ ПРИРОДНЫХ РЕШЕНИЙ
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2587-5566/article/view/135607
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S258755662304009X
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CDFDWP
- ID: 135607
如何引用文章
详细
Increasing the net carbon sequestration of forests is the only way for Russia to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060. In this context, along with measures to increase the area and quality of stands, ways to reduce carbon emissions due to human activities and natural disturbances are important. The article uses regression models of panel data to analyze the spatial heterogeneity of carbon emissions in the Russian forests in 2009–2021 as measured by Global Forest Watch project tools, depending on economic (volume of logging, government spending on forest management, forest protection and forest fire measures) and natural (scale of forest fires and outbreaks of mass reproduction of insect pests) factors. Logging and forest fires are expected to have the greatest impact on forest carbon losses, while spending on the performance of state functions in the sphere of forest relations has almost no response in the reduction of carbon emissions. Thus, in fact, the goal of preserving forests through public investment in appropriate measures has not yet been achieved. The resulting set of regression models can be used to predict the dynamics of the regional effects of forest carbon losses under changes in logging volumes and various trajectories of the dynamics of forest fire activity. Such analysis will be critically necessary for the formation of regional plans for greenhouse gas emission reduction, taking into account the maximum use of the potential of forests’ net carbon sequestration build-up.
作者简介
А. Pyzhev
Siberian Federal University; Center for Forest Ecology and Productivity, Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: apyzhev@sfu-kras.ru
Russia, Krasnoyarsk; Russia, Moscow; Russia, Novosibirsk
参考
- Барталев С.А., Стыценко Ф.В. Спутниковая оценка гибели древостоев от пожаров по данным о сезонном распределении пройденной огнем площади // Лесоведение. 2021. № 2. С. 115–122. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0024114821020029
- Ваганов Е.А. и др. Оценка вклада российских лесов в снижение рисков климатических изменений // Экономика региона. 2021. Т. 17. № 4. С. 1096–1109. https://doi.org/10.17059/EKON.REG.2021-4-4
- Замолодчиков Д.Г., Грабовский В.И., Каганов В.В. Экосистемные услуги и пространственное распределение защитных лесов Российской Федерации // Лесоведение. 2021. № 6. С. 581–592.
- Порфирьев Б.Н., Широв А.А., Семикашев В.В., Колпаков А.Ю. Экономические риски в контексте разработки политики с низким уровнем эмиссий парниковых газов в России // Энергетическая политика. 2020. № 5 (147). С. 92–103.
- Пыжев А.И. Климатическую повестку никто не отменял: почему это важно для российской экономики // ЭКО. 2022. № 7 (577). С. 31–50. https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2022-7-31-50
- Романовская А.А., Трунов А.А., Коротков В.Н., Карабань Р.Т. Проблема учета поглощающей способности лесов России в Парижском соглашении // Лесоведение. 2018. № 5. С. 323–334.
- Филипчук А.Н., Моисеев Б.Н., Малышева Н.В. Новые аспекты оценки поглощения парниковых газов лесами России в контексте Парижского соглашения об изменении климата // Лесохозяйственная информация. 2017. № 1. С. 88–98.
- Шварц Е.А., Птичников А.В. Стратегия низкоуглеродного развития и роль лесов в ее реализации // Науч. труды Вольного экономического общества России. 2022. Т. 236. С. 399–426.
- Швиденко А., Щепащенко Д. Углеродный бюджет лесов России // Сибирский лесной журн. 2014. № 1. С. 69–92.
- Arellano M., Bond S. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations // Review of Economic Studies. 1991. Vol. 58. № 2. 277 p. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
- Croissant Y., Millo G. Panel Data Econometrics in R: The plm Package // J. of Statistical Software. 2008. Vol. 27. № 2.
- Filipchuk A. et al. Russian forests: A new approach to the assessment of carbon stocks and sequestration capacity // Environmental Development. 2018. Vol. 26. P. 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2018.03.002
- Hansen M.C., Potapov P.V., Moore R. et al. High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change // Science. 2013. Vol. 342. № 6160. P. 850–853.
- Harris N.L., Gibbs D.A., Baccini A., Birdsey R.A. et al. Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes // Nature Climate Change. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00976-6
- Kharuk V.I., Ponomarev E.I., Ivanova G.A. et al. Wildfires in the Siberian taiga // Ambio. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01490-x
- Pan Y., Birdsey R.A., Fang J., Houghton R., Kauppi P.E., Kurz W.A., Phillips O.L. et al. A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests // Science. 2011. Vol. 333. № 6045. P. 988–993. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201609
- Pyzhev A.I., Gordeev R.V., Vaganov E.A. Reliability and Integrity of Forest Sector Statistics – A Major Constraint to Effective Forest Policy in Russia // Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 1. № 13. 86 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010086
- Rogelj J., Geden O., Cowie A., Reisinger A. Net-Zero Emissions Targets Are Vague: Three Ways to Fix // Nature. 2021. Vol. 591. № 7850. P. 365–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00662-3
- Romanov A.A. et al. Reassessment of carbon emissions from fires and a new estimate of net carbon uptake in Russian forests in 2001–2021 // Science of The Total Environment. 2022. Vol. 846. № 157322.
- Schepaschenko D. et al. Russian forest sequesters substantially more carbon than previously reported // Scientific Reports. 2021. Vol. 11. № 1. P. 12825.
- Shimizu K., Ota T., Mizoue N. Accuracy Assessments of Local and Global Forest Change Data to Estimate Annual Disturbances in Temperate Forests // Remote Sensing. 2020. Vol. 15. № 12. P. 2438. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12152438
- Tennekes M. tmap: Thematic Maps in R // J. of Statistical Software. 2018. Vol. 84. № 6.
- Wickham H. et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse // J. of Statistical Software. 2019. Vol. 4. № 43. P. 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
- Zhang D., Wang H., Wang X., Lü Z. Accuracy Assessment of the Global Forest Watch Tree Cover 2000 in China // Int. J. of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2020. № 87. P. 102033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2019.102033