Multiple Modals in Ulster-Scots – Wishful Thinking or Reality? (in search of an approach to the problem)
- Authors: Pavlenko A.E.1, Gukalova N.V.2
-
Affiliations:
- A. P. Chekhov Institute of Taganrog (branch) Rostov State University of Economics (RINH)
- Southern Federal University
- Issue: No 4(898) (2025)
- Pages: 70-75
- Section: Linguistics
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2542-2197/article/view/291914
- ID: 291914
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The aim of the study is to assess the extent to which constructions with multiple modal verbs (MMs) and analytical forms of modal verbs in Ulster-Scots are covered in reference and student’s grammars and whether these phenomena can be considered as systemic differential features of the idiom in question. The material for the study consists of grammars and descriptions of Scots, F.S. Robinson’s “Ulster-Scots: a grammar of the traditional written and spoken language” being the principal primary source. The methods used are as follows: observation, description, comparison, as well as some elements of quantitative and qualitative content analysis. Results of the study: MMs (e.g. might could do, etc.) and analytical forms of modal verbs can be characterized as elements of the system and differential features of Ulster-Scots, as well as Scotticisms. They are still present in everyday speech, but are poorly represented in the language of local literature.
About the authors
Aleksandr Evgen’evich Pavlenko
A. P. Chekhov Institute of Taganrog (branch) Rostov State University of Economics (RINH)
Author for correspondence.
Email: alex_pavlenko@inbox.ru
Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Professor at the Department of English Philology
Russian FederationNadezhda Vladimirovna Gukalova
Southern Federal University
Email: nadegda-ni@yandex.ru
Assistant Lecturer at the Institute of Computer Technology and Information Security
Russian FederationReferences
- Nagle, S. (2003). Double modals in the southern United States: Syntactic structure or syntactic structures? In Facchinetti, R., Palmer, F., Krug, M. (Eds.), Modality in Contemporary English (pp. 349–372). Berlin – Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110895339.349.
- Montgomery, M. (1989). Exploring the Roots of Appalachian English. In English World-wide, 10(2), 227–278. 10.1075/EWW.10.2.03MON.
- Pavlenko, A., Karlina, A., Pavlenko, G. (2023). Can a Part Be More Predisposed to Sustainable Development than the Whole? (The Evidence of the Island Dialects of Scots. In: Analele Universitӑţii Din Craiova. Seria Ştiinţe Filologice. Linguisticӑ. Anul XLV, 1–2, 359–367.
- Mather, J. Y., Speitel, H. H., Leslie, G. W. (1977). The Linguistic Atlas of Scotland: Scots Section (vol. 2, with Indices for vols. 1–2). London: Croom Helm.
- Montgomery, M. B., Nagle, S. J. (1993). Double Modals in Scotland and the Southern United States: Transatlantic Inheritance or Independent Development? Folia Linguistica Historica (XIV/1-2, pp. 91–107). Walter de Gruyter: Berlin – Boston. doi: 10.1515/flih.1993.14.1–2.91.
- Nagle, S. (1997). What is Double About Double Modals? In Hickey, R., Puppel, S. (Eds.), Language History and Linguistic Modelling. A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak (pp. 1513–1526). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
- Robinson, Ph. S. (1997). Ulster-Scots: a grammar of the traditional written and spoken language. Belfast: Ullans Press.
- Montgomery, M. (2006). How Scotch-Irish Is Your English? The Journal of East Tennessee History, 77 Supplement, 65–91.
- Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J. (1982). A University Grammar of English. Edited and abbreviated by I. P. Verkhovskaya. Moscow: Vysšaya škola.
Supplementary files
