Syntactic method of forming terms in the sphere of participatory budgeting

the article examines the syntactic method of forming terms in the sphere of participatory budgeting, which is associated with the active use of language to describe new economic and managerial processes. The authors emphasize that terminology not only reflects the development of scientific thought, but is also an important tool for professional communication in highly specialized fields. The purpose of this study is to identify structural models of participatory budgeting terms formed syntactically. The study is based on the analysis of documents and methodological recommendations on participatory budgeting and shows that the terminology of this sphere is replenished primarily by rethinking commonly used words. The work establishes that the main models of term formation are one-, two-, three-, four- and five-component phrases. It is especially noted that two- and three-component terms make up the bulk of the terms and have productive models, such as “noun in the nominative + noun in the genitive” and “adjective in the nominative + noun in the nominative”. Based on the analysis, it is investigated how terms formed syntactically help to accurately designate new concepts in the field of participatory budgeting. In conclusion, the authors note that the syntactic method of forming terms plays a key role in creating relevant and understandable terminology in the field of initiated budgeting. The results of the study may be useful for developing training materials and courses aimed at teaching terminology in the context of budgeting and management. In the long term, the research may become the basis for further discussions and workshops in the field of terms and their formation.

participatory budgeting, term, terminology formation, participatory budgeting terminology, syntactic method, term model