Optimization of technological operations in the cultivation of field crops in arid conditions of the Volga Region

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The research was carried out in order to identify the possibility and prospects of using resource-saving technologies in six-field grain-and-crop rotation on ordinary chernozem in 2019-2022. Four technologies of growing field crops were tested: traditional, two with differentiated processing and direct sowing. During the research period, the prospects of resource- saving technologies with a complex of means of intensification were revealed. Compared with the traditional one, the yield increase here was 0.30…0.57 t/ha (11.0…21.0 %). The maximum productivity of crop rotation is established in technology with differentiated tillage and with the use of intensification means - 2.40 thousand grain units/ha, which is 0.20 thousand grain units/ha (9.1 %) more than the technology with direct sowing and 0.38…0.61 thousand grain units/ha traditional and resource-saving (extensive background). According to the research results, technological operations are proposed for growing field crops using the AUP-18.05 unit for direct sowing of cereals, sunflower - Kuhn seeder: differentiated tillage in crop rotation (including loosening by 25-27 cm of bee-4.5 for sunflower and soy; for pure steam - without autumn processing; for barley and spring wheat - direct sowing) or direct sowing for the purpose of maximum cost recovery; application of ammonium nitrate in a dose of N40 (before sowing spring wheat and barley, spring fertilizing of winter wheat); the main application of azofoski (N15P15K15) in the cultivation of sunflower and soybeans; treatment of grain crops with the agrochemicals Bionex Kemi, biofungicide Phytosporin, fungicide Soligor, sunflower - agrochemicals Borogum.

Sobre autores

O. Goryanin

Samara Federal Research Scientific Center RAS

Email: gorjanin.oleg@mail.ru
3a, Studencheskiy pereulok, Samara, 443001

B. Dzhangabaev

Samara Federal Research Scientific Center RAS

3a, Studencheskiy pereulok, Samara, 443001

E. Shcherbinina

Samara Federal Research Scientific Center RAS

3a, Studencheskiy pereulok, Samara, 443001

L. Pronovich

Samara Federal Research Scientific Center RAS

3a, Studencheskiy pereulok, Samara, 443001

Bibliografia

  1. О целесообразности освоения системы прямого посева на чернозёмах России / А. Л. Иванов, В. В. Кулинцев, В. К. Дридигер и др. // Достижения науки и техники АПК. 2021. Т. 35. № 4. С. 8-16. doi: 10.24411/0235-2451-2021-10401.
  2. Экономическая эффективность возделывания яровой пшеницы по технологиям прямого посева в условиях Среднего Поволжья / А. Л. Тойгильдин, М. И. Подсевалов, И. А. Тойгильдина и др. // Нива Поволжья. 2022. № 3 (63). С. 1006. doi: 10.36461/NP.2022.63.3.011.
  3. Agrotechnological Fundamentals of Direct Sowing of Grain Crops in Russia's Arid Conditions / O. I. Goryanin, S. N. Zudilin, I. F. Medvedev, et al. // Revista geintec-gestao inovacao e tecnologias. 2021. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 204-215. doi: 10.47059/revistageintec.v11i2.1654.
  4. Crop rotation and residue management effects on soil enzyme activities, glomalin and aggregate stability under zero tillage in the Indo-Gangetic Plains / G. Singh, R. Bhattacharyya, T. K. Das, et al. // Soil and Tillage Research. 2018. Vol. 184. P. 291-300. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2018.08.006.
  5. Rehabilitation of soil properties by using direct seeding technology / V. K. Dridiger, A. L. Ivanov, V. P. Belobrov, et al. // Eurasian Soil Science. 2020. Vol. 53. No. 9. P. 1293-1301. doi: 10.1134/S1064229320090033.
  6. Skaalsveen K., Ingram J., Clarke L. E. The effect of no-till farming on the soil functions of water purification and retention in northwestern Europe: а literature review // Soil & Tillage research. 2019. Vol. 189. Р. 98-109. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2019.01.004.
  7. Изменение физических свой ств черноземов при прямом посеве / В. П. Белобров, С. А. Юдин, Н. В. Ярославцева и др. // Почвоведение. 2020. № 7. С. 880-890. doi: 10.31857/S0032180X20070023.
  8. Blanco-Canqui H., Ruis S. J. No-tillage and soil physical environment // Geoderma. 2018. Vol. 326. P. 164-200. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.03.011.
  9. Residue retention and minimum tillage improve physical environment of the soil in croplands: A global meta-analysis / Y Li, Z. Li, S. Cui, et al. // Soil and Tillage Research. 2019. Vol. 194. P. 104-292. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2019.06.009.
  10. Приказ Министерства сельского хозяйства РФ от 6 июля 2017 г. № 330 "Об утверждении коэффициентов перевода в зерновые единицы сельскохозяйственных культур". URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71634802/ (дата обращения: 15.05.2023)
  11. Шафран С. А. Вклад минеральных удобрений в формирование урожайности полевых культур. Сообщение 1. Азотные удобрения // Агрохимия. 2021. № 7. С. 27-35. doi: 10.31857/S0002188121070097.
  12. Корчагин В. А., Горянин О. И., Новиков В. Г. Прямой посев яровой мягкой пшеницы в степных районах Среднего Поволжья // Достижения науки и техники АПК. 2007. № 8. С. 17-19.
  13. Эффективность применения удобрений в засушливых условиях Поволжья / О. И. Горянин, С. В. Обущенко, Б. Ж. Джангабаев и др. //Земледелие. 2020. № 8. С. 29-33. doi: 10.24411/0044-3913-2020-10806.

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies