Influence of substrate and nutrient solution on biometric performance and net productivity of garden strawberry seedlings photosynthesis under photoculture conditions

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The effect of substrate and nutrient solution on biometric parameters and net photosynthesis productivity of strawberry seedlings of the White Swede variety obtained in vitro under light culture conditions at irradiation power of 126.8 and 172.3 mmol/m2/s was investigated. The highest seedlings with a horn diameter of 0.8 cm were obtained in variants using a mineral wool substrate and nutrient solutions at an irradiation power of 126.8 mmol/m2/s. The irradiation power of 172.3 mmol/m2/s contributed to the largest number of leaves in the variants MV+ PR and MV + 1 MS of 10.0 ± 0.5 pcs. in both cases, and the active development of the assimilation area of the leaves. The irradiation power of 126.8 mmol/m2/s and the use of a nutrient solution contributes to the better development of the root system. The net photosynthesis productivity on an organic substrate using a nutrient solution (CS+1 MS) is 1.5-2.5 times higher than when using an organic substrate filled with fertilizers (GT+water). The net photosynthesis productivity of the leaf apparatus of seedlings grown on a mineral wool substrate at an irradiation power of 126.8 mmol/m2/s was in the range from 0.27 to 0.33 mg/cm2/day, and at an irradiation power of 172.3 mmol/m2/s - in the range from 0.23 to 0.29 mg/ cm2/day.

About the authors

V. M Kondratiev

Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University

Email: vitsevsk@mail.ru

A. N Kononenko

Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University

O. F Ivakhnova

Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University

M. V Kiselev

Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University

Yu. N Loginova

Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University

References

  1. Бюллетени о состоянии сельского хозяйства (электронные версии) // Федеральная служба государственной статистики: [сайт]. 2022. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/compendium/document/13277 (дата обращения: 15.11.2022).
  2. Говорова Г.Ф. Земляника: прошлое, настоящее, будущее (Таксономия, эволюция, биология, агротехника, болезни, генетика, селекция, биотехнология, сорта). М.: ФБГНУ Росинформагротех, 2004. 348 с.
  3. Жбанова Е.В., Лукъянчук И.В. Вариабельность химического состава плодов отборных гибридных форм земляники // Плодоводство и ягодоводство России. 2021. 64. С. 46-53. doi: 10.31676/2073-4948-2021-64-46-53
  4. Козлова И.И. Влияние субстрата и фиторегуляторов на развитие корневой системы рассады земляники садовой в малообъемных плагах // Плодоводство и ягодоводство России. 2021. 65. С. 54-59. https://doi.org/10.31676/2073-4948-2021-65-54-59
  5. Куликов И.М. Инновационные технологии возделывания земляники садовой. M.: ФБГНУ Росинформагротех, 2010. 88 с.
  6. Мацнева, О.В., Ташматова Л.В. Клональное микроразмножение земляники - перспективный метод современного питомниководства (обзор) // Современное садоводство. 2019. № 4. С. 113-119. doi: 10.24411/2312-6701-2019-10411.
  7. Методика государственного сортоиспытания сельскохозяйственных культур. Вып. 5: Плодовые, ягодные, субтропические, цитрусовые, орехоплодные культуры, виноград и чай / Подгот. агр. Ю. А. Роговской, А. С. Киселева, А. Д. Крестников [и др.]. М.: Изд-во М-ва сел.хоз-ва СССР, 1970. 160 с.
  8. Таможенная статистика внешней торговли РФ // Федеральная таможенная служба: [сайт]. 2022. URL: http://stat.customs.ru/analysis (дата обращения: 15.11.2022).
  9. ФАОСТАТ// Продовольственная и сельскохозяйственная организация Объединенных Наций: [сайт]. 2022. URL: https://www.fao.org/faostat/ru/#data/QCL (дата обращения: 15.11.2022).
  10. Byadovsky I. The effect of led light sources with varied spectral composition on the in vitro rooting bility of garden strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) // Proceedings on applied botany, genetics and breeding. 2019. 180. Р. 33-37. doi: 10.30901/2227-8834-2019-1-33-37.
  11. Choi, Hyo Gil. Сorrelation among phenotypic parameters related to the growth and photosynthesis of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassaDuch.) grown under various light intensity conditions // Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021. 12. 647585. 10.3389/fpls.2021.647585.
  12. Hayashi Makio, Shirasaka M., Sato K., Yamamoto T. Effects of light intensity and concentration of culture solution on the growth of strawberry plantlets rooted by the direct ex-vitro rooting method // Shokubutsu Kojo Gakkaishi. 1997. 9. Р. 60-66. 10.2525/jshita.9.60.
  13. Hikosaka Sh., Sasaki K., Goto E., Aoki T. Effects of in vitro culture methods during the rooting stage and light quality during the seedling stage on the growth of hydroponic everbearing strawberry // Acta Horticulturae. 2009. 842. Р. 1011-1014. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.842.225.
  14. Hyein L., Seon P., Duy Ph. et al. Effect of the light spectrum of white LEDs on the productivity of strawberry transplants in a plant factory with artificial lighting // Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology. 2020. 61. Р. 1-9. 10.1007/s13580-020-00284-0.
  15. Kondratev V.M., Osipova G.S., Kiselyov M.V., Gudiev O.Yu. Influence of led lighting power on indau (Eruca Sativa (Mill.)) // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Mechanization, engineering, technology, innovation and digital technologies in agriculture. 2021. 723. С. 032078. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/723/3/032078
  16. Lema-Rumińska J., Kulus D., Tymoszuk A. et al. Рhysiological, biochemical, and biometrical response of cultivated strawberry and wild strawberry in greenhouse gutter cultivation in the autumn-winter season in poland-preliminary study // Agronomy. 2021. 11. Р. 1633. 10.3390/agronomy11081633.
  17. Nishiyama M., Kanahama K. Effect of light quality on growth of everbearing strawberry plants // Acta Horticulturae. 2009. 842. Р. 151-154. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.842.17.
  18. Tsuruyama J., Shibuya T. Growth and flowering responses of seed-propagated strawberry seedlings to different photoperiods in controlled environment chambers // Hort. Technology. 2018. 28. Р. 453-458. 10.21273/HORTTECH04061-18.
  19. Unal N., Pekmezci M. Various plant development parameters for strawberries grown in soilless culture // Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment. 2014. 12. Р. 692-696.
  20. Yoshida H., Mizuta D., Fukuda N., Hikosaka S., Goto E. Effects of varying light quality from single-peak blue and red light-emitting diodes during nursery period on flowering, photosynthesis, growth, and fruit yield of everbearing strawberry // Plant Biotechnol. (Tokyo). 2016. 33(4). Р. 267-276. doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.16.0216a.
  21. Zheng Jianfeng, Ji Fang, He Dongxia, Niu Genhua. Effect of light intensity on rooting and growth of hydroponic strawberry runner plants in a led plant factory // Agronomy. 2019. 9. 10.3390/agronomy9120875.

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies