Towards the possibility of "bodily-oriented" design: an environmental perspective

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The relevance of the research is determined by the role that design has to play in the modern world, being a tool for alienating a person from his own body. According to the authors of the article, only thinking that inherits a different civilizational and cultural code from the Western one can resist the process of dehumanization of design, conditioned by the very logic of the development of Western civilization. Following the American design philosopher T. Fry, the authors consider the type of thinking rooted in the Eastern tradition to be promising today, since it is based on the idea of the world as a "single body". According to the philosopher, being, in essence, relational-correlative, this thinking can allow a Westerner to "stand" in an ever-changing world. In order for a Western person to start thinking truly "sustainably", he needs to start living the experience of his body in a different way, relying on a different understanding of corporality. Therefore, the purpose of the article is to answer the question of what it means for a designer today to "think bodily" based on the Eastern understanding of corporality. The authors of the article identify the main aspects of the "consciousness" of the body, which, in turn, is the support for the "bodily-oriented" thinking of the designer. Interaction with the world at the body level presupposes spontaneity (when the designer creates a sketch "instantly", but as if in passing) and relevance (when the design decision exactly corresponds to the time and place). The response occurs under the condition that the designer is internally calm, "empty", that is, likened to the world. The authors of the study conclude that for an Oriental designer, "thinking bodily" still means feeling the living connection of everything with everything in this world.

References

  1. Рыбин В. А. Трансгуманизм как проблема экологического кризиса. // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. 2017. № 13 (409). Философские науки. Вып. 46. С. 5-15.
  2. Höök K. Designing with the Body: Somaesthetic Interaction Design. Cambridge(USA), London: The MIT Press, 2018.
  3. Maldonado T., Bonsiepe G. Science and Design. // Ulm. 1965. No. 10/11. Pp. 10-29.
  4. Krippendorff K. The Semantic Turn. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 2005.
  5. Савчук В. В. О предмете медиафилософии. // Международный журнал исследований культуры. 2011. № 3(4). С. 6-10.
  6. Noguchi H. The Idea of the Body in Japanese Culture and its Dismantlement. // International Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2004. No. 2. Pp. 8-24.
  7. Murata Ch. Zero kara no bijinesu inobeshyon – kansei potensharu shikoho [Мышление «Потенциальнаячувствительность»]. Tokyo: Seisansei Shuppan, 2017.
  8. Sato T. So-suru shiko [Пластичноемышление]. Tokyo: Shincho-sha, 2024.
  9. Фрай Т. Дефутурация: новая философия дизайна. М.: «Дело» РАНХиГС, 2023.
  10. Свирский Я. И., Аршинов В. И. Реляционно-трансдуктивное мышление как аспект мышления-вместе-со-сложностью: опыт когнитивного погружения. // Наука и феномен человека в эпоху цивилизационного макросдвига. М.: Институт общегуманитарных исследований, 2023. С. 158-266.
  11. Penny S. Making Sence: Cognition, Computing, Art and Embodiment. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2017.
  12. Johnson M. The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
  13. Yoshioka T. Mienai katachi. [Невидимыеформы.] Tokyo: Esquire Magazine Japan, 2009.
  14. Ando T., Furuyama M., Migayrou F., Lavisgnes S., Blistene B. Tadao Ando: Endeavors. Paris: Flammarion, 2019.
  15. Shirazi M. An Investigation on Tadao Ando’s Phenomenological Reflections. // Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development. 2012. No. 5 (8). Pp. 21-31.
  16. Ando T., Frampton K. Tadao Ando. New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1991.
  17. Kuma, Kengo. Basho genron – kenchiku wa ika ni shite Basho to setsuzoku suru ka [Теорияместа: являетсялиархитектурапродолжениемместа?]. Tokyo: Ichigaya Shuppan-sha, 2012.
  18. Wang Sh., Ged F., Pechenart E., Horko K.Wang Shu: construire un monde different conforme aux principes de la nature: Building a Different World in accordance with Principles of Nature. Paris: Editions des Cendres, 2012.
  19. Малявин В. В. Пространство в китайской цивилизации. М.: Феория, 2014.
  20. Hui Yu. Art and Cosmotechnics. New York: e-flux, 2021.
  21. Очеретяный К. А. Тело человека – зона отчуждения: к возможности соматической эпистемологии. // Studiaculturae. 2017. № 2 (32). С. 127-136.
  22. Савчук В. В. Топологическая рефлексия. М.: Канон + РООИ «Реа-билитация», 2012.
  23. Hara K. Dezain-no dezain. [Дизайндизайна] Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 2018.
  24. Schusterman R. Somaesthetics and Architecture: A Critical Opinion. // Architecture in the Age of Empire: 11th International Bauhaus-Colloquim. Weimar: Bauhaus-University, 2009. Pp. 283-99.
  25. Kawai, H. Shiawase megane [Очкисчастья]. Tokyo: Kaimei-sha, 1998.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).