Conceptualization of the Art Crisis: the Experience of Branch sociology

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The subject of the research in the article is the crisis of art, which is considered both exogenous (its occurrence is associated with various external factors) and endogenous, identified as a state of self-sufficiency in the existence of art. The emphasis is placed on the analysis of the experience of the sociology of art in understanding the crisis and crisis as a factor in the development of time and man. An assessment of the theorizing about the crisis of art at the interdisciplinary level is given, and the main emphasis is placed on the potential of sociological knowledge in stating the state of art under study. In addition, the main directions of conceptualization of the crisis of art in science are revealed.   The main conclusions of the study are the following key provisions: 1) conceptualization of the crisis of art within the framework of the relevant branch of sociology is carried out both in terms of understanding art as a form of public consciousness, and from the point of view of the correlation of form and content, as well as ideological and artistic potential; 2) conceptualization of the crisis of art is an independent perspective of scientific research that sets the task of objectifying the crisis of art, understanding the basic laws of its occurrence 3) the sociology of art identifies the crisis of art as a state in which the role of art in the socialization and inculturation of the individual decreases.

References

  1. Барт Р. Смерть автора // Барт Р. Избранные работы: Семиотика. Поэтика. М.: Прогресс, 1994. С. 384-391.
  2. Бердяев H.A. Кризис искусства. М.: СП «Интерпринт», 1990. 48 с.
  3. Жданова В.А. Взгляд в будущее: опыт прогнозирования в сфере искусства // Вестник Томского гос. ун-та. Культурология и искусствоведение. 2019. № 35. С. 182-189. doi: 10.17223/22220836/35/17
  4. Мальцева Л.В. Искусство, философия, общественное сознание // Общество: философия, история, культура. 2012. № 1. С. 19-22.
  5. Соколова Н., Михайлова Е. Литература «не для всех» и феномен guilty pleasure: литературные классификации как пространство создания различения // Социологическое обозрение. 2022. Т. 21. № 1. С. 180-205. doi: 10.17323/1728-192x-2022-1-180-205
  6. Чистякова М.Г., Преображенский Г.М. Трансформация чувственности в постантропоцентричном искусстве // Философский журнал / Philosophy Journal. 2022. Т. 15. № 3. С. 84-99.doi: 10.21146/2072-0726-2022-15-3-84-99
  7. Belluigi D. Intentionality in a Creative Art Curriculum // The Journal of Aesthetik Education. 2011. V. 45. № 1. Р. 18-36. doi: 10.1353/jae.2011.0005
  8. Bôas G.V., Quemin A. Art et société: Recherches récentes et regards croisés. Brésil/France: Оuvrage en ligne, 2016. 456 р.
  9. Chan T.W., Goldthorpe J.H. Social Stratification and Cultural Consumption: The Visual Arts in England // Poetics. 2007. Vol. 35. № 2-3. P. 168-190.
  10. Coulangeon P., Lemel Y. Is «Distinction» Really Outdated? Questioning the Meaning of the Omnivorization of Musical Taste in Contemporary France // Poetics. 2007. Vol. 35. № 2-3. P. 93-111.
  11. DiMaggio P. Cultural Entrepreneurship in Nineteenth-Century Boston: The Creation of an Organizational Base for High Culture in America // Media, Culture & Society. 1982. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 33-50.
  12. Erickson B.H. Culture, Class, and Connections // American Journal of Sociology. 1996. Vol. 102. № 1. P. 217-251.
  13. Goffman E. Symbols of Class Status // British Journal of Sociology. 1951. Vol. 2. № 4. P. 294-304.
  14. Halle D., Tiso Е. New York’s New Edge: Contemporary Art, the High Line and Urban Megaprojects on the Far West Side. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 2014. 432 р.
  15. Jing W. On the Relationship between Content and Form in Art Works Take Xin Dongwang's Oil Paintings of Figures as an Example // Talent and Wisdom. 2019. Vol. 30. Р. 218-222.
  16. Lamont M., Molnár V. The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences // Annual Review of Sociology. 2002. Vol. 28. P. 167-195.
  17. Lizardo O., Skiles S. Reconceptualizing and Theorizing «Omnivorousness» Genetic and Relational Mechanisms // Sociological Theory. 2012. Vol. 30. № 4. P. 263-282.
  18. Marschallek B., Weiler S., Jorg M. Make It Special! Negative Correlations Between the Need for Uniqueness and Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity // Empirical Studies of The Arts. 2021. Vol. 39. Iss. 1. Р. 17-39. doi: 10.1177/0276237419880298
  19. Simmel G. Fashion // American Journal of Sociology. 1957. Vol. 62. № 6. P. 541-558.
  20. Takšić V., Arar L., Molander B. Measuring Emotional Intelligence: Perception of Affective Content in Art // Studia Psychologica. 2004. № 46(3). Р. 4-20.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).