电邮这篇文章 Types and markers of narrative discourse in Galen's Anatomical Writings
- 作者: Prolygina I.V.1
-
隶属关系:
- 期: 编号 2 (2025)
- 页面: 34-42
- 栏目: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2454-0749/article/view/361795
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0749.2025.2.73458
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HECUML
- ID: 361795
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
A significant part of the voluminous corpus of texts by Galen (129–210/217 AD) are composed of works written in the genre of narrative prose. In this article, using the material of his anatomical works, in particular, the work "On the bones for beginners", different types of narrative discourse and their linguistic markers are analyzed, such as first-person statements, self-references, transitions from the past tense to the present or future, metadiscursive expressions and appeals to a fictitious interlocutor, expressions of the author's opinion or value judgments, the use of extraclausal components, such as interjections and particles of the ancient Greek language. The results of the study showed that the style of narrative prose by Galen is characterized by features of conversational diaphonic discourse, which implies a continuous dialogue with the reader. Despite the author's distinct style, it is noted that Galen's prose has a number of common features with the works of the sophists of his time who belonged to the circle of the Second Sophistic, such as Lucian or Aelius Aristides, and, on the contrary, differs greatly from the technical prose of his medical contemporaries, for example, from the works of Rufus of Ephesus, Soranus or the authors of the Pseudo-Galenic corpus of texts. Further study of the narrative discourse in Galen's texts opens up broad prospects for the analysis and mapping of his texts, which will allow us to see the intertextual layers of his works that are hidden to this day, as well as to understand the specifics of Greek prose of the imperial period. The article may be useful to philologists, linguists, historians of science and medicine and find application in lecture courses and practical classes on the analytical reading of ancient authors.
参考
Vogt S. Drugs and Pharmacology / R. J. Hankinson (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Galen (pp. 304-22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. P. 304-322. Petit C. Galien et le “discours de la méthode”: rhétorique(s) médicale(s) à l’époque romaine / J. Coste, D. Jacquart, and J. Pigeaud (eds.). La rhétorique médicale à travers les siècles: actes du colloque international de Paris, 9 et 10 octobre 2008. Genève: Droz, 2012. P. 49-75. Nutton, V. (2012). Galen's rhetoric of certainty / J. Coste, D. Jacquart, and J. Pigeaud (eds.). La rhétorique médicale à travers les siècles: actes du colloque international de Paris, 9 et 10 octobre 2008. Genève: Droz. P. 39-49. Nutton V. Style and Context in the Method of Healing / R. J. Durling and F. Kudlien (eds.). Galen's Method of Healing. Leiden: Brill, 1991. P. 1-25. Nutton V. Galeni De praecognitione. Galen. On Prognosis. CMG V 8, 1. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1979. Mattern S. Galen and the Rhetoric of Healing. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2008. Petit C. Galien de Pergame ou la rhétorique de la Providence. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2018. Пролыгина И. В. Трактат Галена «О костях для начинающих» // Hypothekai. Вып. 5. Учебные тексты вАнтичности. М.: Аквилон, 2021. C. 141-171. Kroon C. Latin Discourse Particles: A Study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at. Amsterdam: Brill Academic Pub., 1995. Langslow D. R. Medical Latin in the Roman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Пролыгина И. В. Биобиблиографические трактаты Галена Пергамского как проект унификации медицинского образования // Историко-философский ежегодник 2016. Институт философии РАН. М.: Аквилон, 2016. С. 33-49. Boudon-Millot V. Les oeuvres de Galien pour les débutants (De sectis, De pulsibus ad tirones, De ossibus ad tirones, Ad Glauconem de methodo medendi et Ars medica): médecine et pédagogie au IIe siècle après J.-C. // Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt, Band II 37.2. Berlin, New York: W. de Gruyter, 1994. P. 1421-1467. Пролыгина И. В. Гален. О порядке собственных книг. // Историко-философский ежегодник 2016. Институт философии РАН. М.: Аквилон, 2016. С. 50-68. Пролыгина И. В. Гален. De libris propriis. О собственных книгах. // Schole. Философское антиковедение и классическая традиция. Т. 11, № 2, 2017. С. 636-677. von Staden H. Author and Authority, Celsus and the Construction of a Scientific Self // Vázquez Buján M.E. (eds.) Tradición e innovación de la medicina latina de la Antigüedad y de la Alta Edad Media. Actas del IV Coloquio Internacional sobre los “Textos Médicos latinos antiguos”. Santiago de Compostela, 1994. P. 103-117. Denniston J. D. Greek Particles. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950. Rijksbaron A. New Approaches to Greek Particles. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben, 1997. Wakker G. Modal Particles and Differents Points of View in Herodotus and Thucydides / E.J. Bakker (ed.) Grammar as Interpretation. Greek Literature in its Linguistic Context. Leiden, 1997. P. 215-250. Petit C. Greek Particles in Galen’s Oeuvre: Some Case Studies // Scripta Classica Israelica, Vol. XL, 2021. P. 95-123.
补充文件
