Self-efficacy and Metacognition as the Mediated Effects of Growth Mindset on Academic Writing Performance

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

Background: Various studies have highlighted the theoretical roles of growth mindset, self-efficacy, and metacognition in academic writing. However, the clarity regarding which variables act as mediators in this context remains underexplored.

Purpose: This study investigates how self-efficacy and metacognition mediate the effects of a growth mindset on academic writing performance among EFL students. It aims to clarify the mediating roles of these variables, directing the development of four research hypotheses and a conceptual model.

Method: The study employed a structural equation modelling (SEM) method using the PLS-SEM analysis. Participants included 464 EFL undergraduate students from 28 provinces in Indonesia, who were working on their theses. They completed a series of valid and reliable scales online.

Results: Analysis revealed that growth mindset significantly influences self-efficacy for ideation and metacognition. Further, self-efficacy in ideation, convention, and self-regulation, along with metacognition, effectively mediated the relationship between growth mindset and academic writing performance.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that growth mindset significantly impacts academic writing performance through its influence on self-efficacy and metacognition. This underscores the importance of these mediators in enhancing academic writing competence. Consequently, EFL writing lecturers and thesis supervisors should focus on interventions that strengthen these attributes. Future research should continue to explore effective strategies to enhance metacognition and self-efficacy, thereby contributing to the broader field of EFL education.

作者简介

Lastika Prihandoko

Universitas Sebelas Maret

Email: prihandoko@unmus.ac.id
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0563-9722
Surakarta, Indonesia

Ruly Morganna

Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Email: rulymorganna@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2188-2511
Bengkulu, Indonesia

Suci Nugrah Amalia

Universitas Negeri Malang

Email: suci.nugrahamalia@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5189-8813
Malang, Indonesia

参考

  1. Adamson, J. L., Coulson, D., & Fujimoto-Adamson, N. (2019). Supervisory practices in English-medium undergraduate and postgraduate applied linguistics thesis writing: Insights from Japan-based tutors. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 14-27.
  2. Aliyu, M. M., Fung, Y. M., Abdullah, M. H., & Hoon, T. B. (2016). Developing undergraduates' awareness of metacognitive knowledge in writing through problem-based learning.International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(7), 233-240. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.7p.233
  3. Altınmakas, D., & Bayyurt, Y. (2019). An exploratory study on factors influencing undergraduate students' academic writing practices in Turkey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 88-103. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.006
  4. Amalia, S. N., Nurisma, R. A., Widiati, U., & Prihandoko, L. A. (2023). Learners' agency, beliefs, mindsets and teacher autonomy as predictors of willingness to communicate in online learning. TESL-EJ, 27(3). DOI:https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27107a3
  5. Aqeel, A., Shah, S. K., & Bilal, M. (2020). Logical Reasoning and Fallacious in Post Graduate Research in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Society, Education and Language (PJSEL), 6(1), 178-201.
  6. Ardi, P., Amalia, S. N., Widiati, U., Walker, D., & Prihandoko, L. A. (2024). Writing enjoyment among EFL Postgraduate students in Indonesia: The interplay between students' writing self-efficacy and research literacy and teachers' immediacy and clarity. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 632-661.
  7. Arroyo González, R., Fernández-Lancho, E., & Maldonado Jurado, J. A. (2021). Learning effect in a multilingual web-based argumentative writing instruction model, called ecm, on metacognition, rhetorical moves and self-efficacy for scientific purposes. Mathematics, 9(17), 1-24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/math9172119
  8. Bai, B., & Guo, W. (2018). Influences of self-regulated learning strategy use on self-efficacy in primary school students' English writing in Hong Kong. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 34(6), 523-536. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1499058
  9. Bai, B., & Wang, J. (2020). The role of growth mindset, self-efficacy and intrinsic value in self-regulated learning and English language learning achievements. Language Teaching Research, 1-22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820933190
  10. Bai, B., Wang, J., & Nie, Y. (2020). Self-efficacy, task values and growth mindset: what has the most predictive power for primary school students' self-regulated learning in English writing and writing competence in an Asian Confucian cultural context? Cambridge Journal of Education, 1-20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1778639
  11. Briesmaster, M. (2017). Coherence and cohesion in EFL students' writing production: The impact of a metacognition-based intervention. Ikala, 22(1), 183-202. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n02a02
  12. Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D. F., McKim, C., & Zumbrunn, S. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 25-38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029692
  13. Cahyono, B. Y., Irawati, R., Amalia, S. N., & Hidayat, L. E. (2024). Project-based Learning in EFL educational settings: A meta-analysis study in EFL/ESL writing. Journal of Writing Research.
  14. Callinan, C. J., van der Zee, E., & Wilson, G. (2018). Developing essay writing skills: An evaluation of the modelling behaviour method and the influence of student self-efficacy. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(5), 608-622. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1302564
  15. Chakma, U., Li, B., & Kabuhung, G. (2021). Creating online metacognitive spaces: Graduate research writing during the covid-19 pandemic. Issues in Educational Research, 31(1), 37-55.
  16. Chen, W., & Hapgood, S. (2021). Understanding knowledge, participation and learning in L2 collaborative writing: A metacognitive theory perspective. Language Teaching Research, 25(2), 256-281. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819837560
  17. Colognesi, S., Piret, C., & Demorsy, S. (2020). Teaching writing-with or without metacognition?: An exploratory study of 11-to 12-year-old students writing a book review.International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(5), 459-470. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2020562136
  18. Cooper, J. B., Lee, S., Jeter, E., & Bradley, C. L. (2020). Psychometric validation of a growth Mindset and Team Communication Tool to measure self-views of growth mindset and team communication skills. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 60(6), 818-826. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2020.04.012
  19. Crossley, S. A., Muldner, K., & Mcnamara, D. S. (2016). Idea generation in student writing: Computational assessments and links to successful writing. Written Communication, 1-27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316650178
  20. Csizér, K., & Tankó, G. (2017). English majors' self-regulatory control strategy use in academic writing and its relation to L2 motivation. Applied Linguistics, 38(3), 386-404. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv033
  21. Daniels, S., McCurdy, M., Whitsitt, L., Skinner, C. H., Schwartz-Micheaux, J., & White, J. (2020). Evaluating the effects of a writing self-efficacy intervention on writing quantity in middle school students. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 36(1), 48-64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1618226
  22. Escorcia, D., & Ros, C. (2019). What variables interact with metacognitive processes related to writing in university students: The role of demographic and education factors. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 17(49), 639-664. DOI:https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v17i49.2486
  23. Gorrostieta, J. M. G., & López-López, A. (2016). Argumentation identification for academic support in undergraduate writings. European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, 98-109. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_8
  24. Govier, T. (2019). Problems in argument analysis and evaluation. In Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22329/wsia.06.2018
  25. Grenner, E., Johansson, V., van de Weijer, J., & Sahlén, B. (2021). Effects of intervention on self-efficacy and text quality in elementary school students' narrative writing. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 46(1), 1-10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2019.1709539
  26. Guraya, S. Y., & Guraya, S. S. (2017). The confounding factors leading to plagiarism in academic writing and some suggested remedies: A systematic review. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 67(5), 767-772.
  27. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  28. Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer Nature. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
  29. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
  30. Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002
  31. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  32. Howe, L., & Wig, A. Van. (2017). Metacognition via creative writing: dynamic theories of learning support habits of the mind in 21st century classrooms. Journal of Poetry Therapy, 30(3), 139-152. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/08893675.2017.1328830
  33. Hwang, S. (2020). The mediating effects of self-efficacy and classroom stress on professional development and student-centered instruction.International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 1-16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.1411A
  34. Iwasaki, C., Tada, Y., Furukawa, T., Sasaki, K., Yamada, Y., Nakazawa, T., & Ikezawa, T. (2019). Design of e-learning and online tutoring as learning support for academic writing. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 14(2), 85-96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-06-2019-0024
  35. Jonassen, D. H., & Kim, B. (2010). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Design justifications and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(4), 439-457. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9143-8
  36. Kansızoğlu, H. B., & Bayrak Cömert, Ö. (2020). The effect of teaching writing based on flipped classroom model on metacognitive writing awareness and writing achievements of middle-school students. TeEği̇ti̇m VBi̇li̇m, 46, 279-302. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2020.8823
  37. Karlen, Y. (2017). The development of a new instrument to assess metacognitive strategy knowledge about academic writing and its relation to self-regulated writing and writing performance. Journal of Writing Research, 9(1), 61-86. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2017.09.01.03
  38. Kessler, M. (2021). Supplementing mobile-assisted language learning with reflective journal writing: a case study of Duolingo users' metacognitive awareness. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1968914
  39. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
  40. Kock, N. (2016). Advantages of nonlinear over segmentation analyses in path models.International Journal of E-Collaboration (Ijec), 12(4), 1-6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4018/IJeC.2016100101
  41. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2020). The interplay between academic writing abilities of Dutch undergraduate students, a remedial writing programme, and academic achievement.International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1-12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1726280
  42. Latifi, S., & Noroozi, O. (2021). Supporting argumentative essay writing through an online supported peer-review script. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(5), 501-511. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1961097
  43. Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2019). Language mindsets, meaning-making, and motivation. The Palgrave Handbook of Motivation for Language Learning, 537-559. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28380-3_26
  44. Loughlin, V. D. O., & Griffith, L. M. (2020). Developing student metacognition through reflective writing in an upper level undergraduate anatomy course. Anatomical Sciences Education, 13(6), 680-693. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1945
  45. Miller, R. T., & Pessoa, S. (2016). Where's your thesis statement and what happened to your topic sentences? identifying organizational challenges in undergraduate student argumentative writing. TESOL Journal, 7(4), 847-873. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.248
  46. Mitchell, K. M., Harrigan, T., & McMillan, D. E. (2017). Writing self-efficacy in nursing students: The influence of a discipline-specific writing environment. Nursing Open, 4, 240-250. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.90
  47. Mitchell, K. M., Harrigan, T., Stefansson, T., & Setlack, H. (2017). Exploring self-effifficacy and anxiety in first-year nursing students enrolled in a discipline-specifific scholarly writing course. Quality Advancement in Nursing Education, 3(1), 1-23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17483/2368-6669.1084
  48. Mitchell, K. M., & McMillan, D. E. (2018). A curriculum-wide assessment of writing self-efficacy in a baccalaureate nursing program. Nurse Education Today, 20-27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.003
  49. Mitchell, K. M., Mcmillan, D. E., Lobchuk, M. M., Nickel, N. C., Rabbani, R., & Li, J. (2021). Development and validation of the situated academic writing self-efficacy scale (SAWSES). Assessing Writing, 48, 1-20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100524
  50. Moreno, A. I., & Swales, J. M. (2018). Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 40-63. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.006
  51. Njegić, K., Damnjanović, J., & Komnenić, B. (2020). Mediated effect of export assistance on export performance of Serbian manufacturing SMEs. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(5), 649-667. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-03-2020-0084
  52. Noroozi, O., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2016). Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 20-31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.002
  53. Pitenoee, M. R., & Modaberi, A. (2017). The effect of cognitive and metacognitive writing strategies on content of the iranian intermediate efl learners' writing. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(3), 594-600. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0803.19
  54. Prihandoko, L. A., Djatmika, D., & Nurkamto, J. (2022).Complexities of Online Thesis Supervision during the Covid-19 Pandemic: EFL Lecturers' Perceptions. 67th TEFLIN International Virtual Conference & the 9th ICOELT 2021 (TEFLIN ICOELT 2021), 262-269. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220201.047
  55. Puryantoa, E., Rasyidb, Y., & Murtadhoc, F. (2021). Prior knowledge-based metacognition strategies in developing students' writing skills assessment tools: Preparing the student teachers. Asian EFL Journal, 28(1), 85-108.
  56. Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2021). Exploring the impact of wiki-mediated collaborative writing on EFL students' writing performance, writing self-regulation, and writing self-efficacy: A mixed methods study. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1888753
  57. Ramadhanti, D., Ghazali, A. S., Hasanah, M., Harsiati, T., & Yanda, D. P. (2020). The use of reflective journal as a tool for monitoring of metacognition growth in writing.International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(11), 162-187. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i11.11939
  58. Sabti, A. A., Md Rashid, S., Nimehchisalem, V., & Darmi, R. (2019). The impact of writing anxiety, writing achievement motivation, and writing self-efficacy on writing performance: A correlational study of Iraqi tertiary EFL learners. SAGE Open, 9(4), 1-13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019894289
  59. Sato, M., & Dussuel Lam, C. (2021). Metacognitive instruction with young learners: A case of willingness to communicate, L2 use, and metacognition of oral communication. Language Teaching Research, 13621688211004640. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211004639
  60. Shahsavar, Z., & Kourepaz, H. (2020). Postgraduate students' difficulties in writing their theses literature review. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1784620. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1784620
  61. Shen, B., Bai, B., & Park, M. (2020). Exploring Hong Kong primary students' English writing motivation: relationships between writing self-efficacy and task value. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1-15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1823397
  62. Sherafati, N., & Mahmoudi Largani, F. (2022). The potentiality of computer-based feedback in fostering EFL learners' writing performance, self-regulation ability, and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Computers in Education 2022, 1-29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/S40692-022-00221-3
  63. Suen, R. (2021). EFL students' perceptions of transferable writing skills and knowledge for undergraduate thesis writing from an EAP research writing course. Asian EFL Journal, 28(1), 286-314.
  64. Sultan, I., & Moqbali, A. (2020). Metacognitive writing strategies used by Omani grade twelve students.International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(8), 214-232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.8.12
  65. Sun, T., & Wang, C. (2020). College students' writing self-efficacy and writing self-regulated learning strategies in learning English as a foreign language. System, 90, 102221. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102221
  66. Teng, F. (2020). Tertiary-Level Students' English Writing Performance and Metacognitive Awareness: A Group Metacognitive Support Perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(4), 551-568. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1595712
  67. Teng, M. F. (2020). Effects of cooperative-metacognitive instruction on EFL learners' writing and metacognitive awareness. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 00(00), 1-17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1835606
  68. Teng, M. F. (2021). Effects of Individual and group metacognitive prompts on tertiary-level students' metacognitive awareness and writing outcomes. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/S40299-021-00611-8
  69. Teng, M. F., Qin, C., & Wang, C. (2021). Validation of metacognitive academic writing strategies and the predictive effects on academic writing performance in a foreign language context. Metacognition and Learning, 1-24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09278-4
  70. Teng, M. F., & Yue, M. (2023). Metacognitive writing strategies, critical thinking skills, and academic writing performance: A structural equation modeling approach. Metacognition and Learning, 18(1), 237-260. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09328-5
  71. Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge university press. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
  72. Truax, M. L. (2018). The impact of teacher language and growth mindset feedback on writing motivation. Literacy Research and Instruction, 57(2), 135-157. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2017.1340529
  73. Tsao, J. J. (2021). Effects of EFL learners' L2 writing self-efficacy on engagement with written corrective feedback. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 575-584. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00591-9
  74. Valero Haro, A., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2019). The effects of an online learning environment with worked examples and peer feedback on students' argumentative essay writing and domain-specific knowledge acquisition in the field of biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 53(4), 390-398. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1472132
  75. Vincent, C., Tremblay-Wragg, É., Déri, C., Plante, I., & Mathieu Chartier, S. (2021). How writing retreats represent an ideal opportunity to enhance PhD candidates' writing self-efficacy and self-regulation. Teaching in Higher Education, 1-20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1918661
  76. Vincent, C., Tremblay-Wragg, É., Déri, C., Plante, I., & Mathieu Chartier, S. (2023). How writing retreats represent an ideal opportunity to enhance PhD candidates' writing self-efficacy and self-regulation. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(7), 1600-1619. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1918661
  77. Wafubwa, R. N., & Csíkos, C. (2020). Formative assessment as a predictor of mathematics teachers' levels of metacognitive regulation.International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 983-998. DOI:https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14158A
  78. Weaver, K. F., Morales, V., Nelson, M., Weaver, P. F., Toledo, A., & Godde, K. (2016). The benefits of peer review and a multisemester capstone writing series on inquiry and analysis skills in an undergraduate thesis. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), ar51.1-ar51.9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0072
  79. Wong, K. K.-K. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1-32.
  80. Yang, Y.-F. (2010). Students' reflection on online self-correction and peer review to improve writing.Computers & Education, 55(3), 1202-1210. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.017
  81. Zaki, A. A., & Md Yunus, M. (2015). Potential of mobile learning in teaching of ESL academic writing. English Language Teaching, 8(6), 11-19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n6p11
  82. Zander, L., Brouwer, J., Jansen, E., Crayen, C., & Hannover, B. (2018). Academic self-efficacy, growth mindsets, and university students' integration in academic and social support networks. Learning and Individual Differences, 62, 98-107. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.01.012
  83. Zha, S., Wu, S., & Estis, J. M. (2021). Using Team-Based Learning to Promote Engineering Students' Performance and Self-Efficacy in a Technical Writing Class. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 64(4), 456-467. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2021.3110619
  84. Zhang, H., & Li, Y. (2021).Integrating active learning activities and metacognition into STEM writing courses. Advances in Physiology Education, 45(4), 902-907. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1152/ADVAN.00086.2021

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载


Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名 4.0国际许可协议的许可