Game as a method for increasing the efficiency of legal thinking

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

The present paper has as its object the investigation of the methodological basis for improving the effectiveness of legal thinking in game. The place of legal thinking is defined as a constitutive component of law and as a way of constructing legal reality. This paper identifies the problem of the need to improve the efficiency of legal thinking, proposes criteria for effective legal thinking (competitiveness, creativity, productivity, risk-orientation, proactivity, speed) and justifies why the game is the main methodological tool to increase the effectiveness of legal thinking. This paper focuses on the intersubjective context of the game, on the game methodological design’s features, on the peculiarities of the game in the context of globalization. The problem of the educational crisis is designated primarily as a methodological crisis associated with the application of traditional teaching methods to the generation that requires new creative teaching methods. It is substantiated that the game from a methodological point of view allows to reorient the teaching of the discipline from the preferential appropriation of knowledge by students to their predominantly creative development and use. Unlike traditional teaching methods, the game helps not to accumulate and organize knowledge, but to generate it. Thanks to the game, a new type of thinking is being formed — creative thinking.

作者简介

Iya Osvetimskaya

National Research University of Higher School of Economics (Campus in Saint-Petersburg); Saint Petersburg State University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: osv.iya@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7869-7675
SPIN 代码: 9254-4731

Candidate of Legal Science, Associate Professor at the Department of Theory and History of Law and State; Associate Professor at the Department of Theory and History of State and Law

俄罗斯联邦, Saint Petersburg

参考

  1. Avakyan T. V. Yuridicheskoe myshlenie v pravoprimenitel’nom processe: avtoref. dis. … k.yu.n. Rostov n/D, 2006. 18 s.
  2. Bahtin M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo. Moscow, 1972. 464 s.
  3. Bahtin M. Avtor i geroi v esteticheskoy deyatel’nosti // Avtor i geroi: k filosofskim osnovam gumanitarnyh nauk. Saint Petersburg, 2000. 337 s.
  4. Bibihin V. Haidegger: ot “Bytiya i vremeni” k “Beiträge” // Germeneya: Zhurnal filosofskih perevodov. 2009. No. 1(1). URL: http://germeneia.ru/zhurnal-1-1-2009/ (data obrascheniya: 26.03.2019).
  5. Borulenkov Yu. P. Pravovoe myshlenie kak intellektual’naya sostavlyauschaya yuridicheskogo poznaniya // Pravovedenie. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. 2017. No. 2. S. 6-41.
  6. Gadamer H.-G. Istina i metod. Moscow, 1988. 704 s.
  7. Kuklin S. V. K voprosu o structure yuridicheskogo myshleniya // Vestnik UYrGU. Seriya “Pravo”. 2016. T. 16. No. 3. S. 22-26.
  8. Lotman Yu. M. Nepredskazuemye mehanizmy kultury. Tallin, 2010. S. 134-142.
  9. Lukovskaya D. I. Politicheskie i pravovye ucheniya: istiriko-teoreticheskiy aspect. Leningrad, 1985. 161 s.
  10. Monten’ M. O vospitanii detey // Opyty. Sud’by I nravy. Saint Petersburg, 2007. 528 s.
  11. Maracha V. G. Pravoponimanie v sostyazatel’nyh institutah // Nauchnye Trudy “Adilet”. 2000. No. 1(7). S. 116-122.
  12. Maracha V. G., Matuhin A. A. Yuridicheskoe myshlenie: pravo v metodologicheskoy perspektive. Posleslovie k knige: Rozin V. M. Yuridicheskoe myshlenie (formirivanie, sociokulturny context, perspektivy razvitiya). Almaty, 2000. S. 260-291. URL: https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fion.ranepa.ru%2Fupload%2Fimages%2FMaracha_ur_myshlenie.doc (data obrascheniya: 27.04.2019).
  13. Ovchinnikov A. I. Pravovoe myshlenie: teoretiko-metodologicheskiy analiz / Otv. red. P. P. Baranov. Rostov-on-Don, 2003. 344 s.
  14. Popov S. Organizacionno-deyatel’nostnye igry: myshlenie v “zone riska”. URL: http://www.ckp.ru/biblio/p/popov/odi_mvzr.htm (data obrascheniya: 26.03.2019).
  15. Problemy civilizacii po mere prodvizheniya. URL: http://www.ewrikasmc.ru/?p=995 (data obrascheniya: 11.05.2019).
  16. RBK. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/society/19/01/2008/5703cac89a79470eaf768cb1 (data obrascheniya: 11.05.2019).
  17. Retunskih L. T. Filosofiya igry. Moscow, 2002. 256 s.
  18. Rozin V. M. Yuridicheskoe myshlenie (formirivanie, sociokulturny context, perspektivy razvitiya). Almaty, 2000. 294 s.
  19. Rozin V. M. Konceptualizaciya myshleniya v filosofii I psihologii // Psihologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 2011. T. 8. No. 2. S. 3-25.
  20. Rozin V. M. Metodologiya, myshlenie, kommunikaciya // Psihologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 2013. T. 10. No. 1. S. 3-21.
  21. Rozin V.M. Istiriya I metodologiya yuridcheskoy nauki. Yuridicheskoe myshlenie. Uch. posobie dlya bakalavriata I magistratury / V.M. Rozin. 2-e izdanie Moscow, 2018. 206 s.
  22. Tendryakova M. V. Igrivye miry: ot homo ludens do geimera. Mosow, Saint Peterburg. 2015. URL: http://www.klex.ru/k71 (data obrascheniya: 20.04.2019).
  23. Finnis Dzh. Estestvennoe pravo i estestvennye prava. Moscow, 2012. 554 s.
  24. Haidegger M. Vklady v delo filosofii. Ot sobytiya // Germeneya: Zhurnal filosofskih perevodov. 2009. No. 1(1). URL: http://germeneia.ru/zhurnal-1-1-2009/ (data obrascheniya: 20.04.2019).
  25. Heizinga I. Homo ludens. Chelovek igrauschiy / Sost., predisl. i per. s niderl. D.V. Sil’vestrova; Komment., ukazatel’ D. E. Haritonovicha. Saint Petersburg, 2011. 416 s.
  26. Chto takoe yuridicheskiy dizain. URL: https://blog.casebook.ru/chto-takoe-uridicheskij-dizajn/ (data obrascheniya: 11.05.2019).
  27. Shevyrev A. V., Romanchuk M.N. Formirovanie I razvitie sistemno-kreativnogo myshleniya — bazovaya strategiya obrazovaniya v XXI veke. URL: http://spkurdyumov.ru/education/formirovanie-i-razvitie-sistemno-kreativnogo-myshleniya/ (data obrascheniya: 11.05.2019).
  28. Shutz A. Struktura povsednevnogo myshleniya // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 1988. No. 2. URL: http://ktpu.kpi.ua/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/A-SHyuts-struktura.pdf (data obrascheniya: 27.04.2019).
  29. Schedrovitskiy G.P. Sladkaya diktatura mysli // Voprosy metodologii. 1994. No. 1-2.
  30. Lenert M. E. Simulations and Games for Teaching Law: What’s Possible? (Extended Abstract). Michigan State University, East Lansing MI. 2012. 9 p. URL: http://meaningfulplay.msu.edu/proceedings2012/mp2012_submission_119.pdf (data obrascheniya: 25.05.2019).
  31. Mika K. Games in the Law School Classroom: Enhancing the Learning Experience // Perspectives. Teaching Legal Research and Writing. Vol. 18. No. 1. 2009. P. 1-6. URL: https://info.legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.com/pdf/perspec/2009-fall/2009-fall-1.pdf (data obrascheniya: 25.05.2019).
  32. NASA CoLab Island. SPACEHACK a directory of ways to participate in space exploration. URL: https://spacehack.org/ (data obrascheniya: 11.05.2019).
  33. Ribeiro G. F. Role-Playing Games as an Alternative Method for the Crisis in Legal Teaching: the Case of the Prohibition of Torture and L&E // Economic Analysis of Law Review. V. 5. No. 2. 2014. P. 179-187. URL: file:///C:/Users/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C/Downloads/Role-Playing_Games_as_an_Alternative_Method_for_th.pdf (data obrascheniya: 25.05.2019).
  34. What is a Law Design? URL: http://www.lawbydesign.co/en/home/ (data obrascheniya: 11.05.2019).

版权所有 © Osvetimskaya I.I., 2019

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用-禁止演绎 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##