Law of Digital Society: Actual Problems and the Way of Development (the Ending)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The author believes that attempts to oppose the postmodern society to digital society are scientifically inappropriate for several reasons. First, according to the consensus adopted in the relevant literature, post-industrial society is a stage of sociocultural evolution, at a point when sophisticated technologies, including information technologies, begin to play a leading cultural role, determining the direction of the development of human civilization. Secondly, the cultural, social, political, and legal uncertainties of the Postmodern Era are not encouraged and are rather exacerbated during the digitalization of society and law enforcement. In his conclusion, the author discusses the digitalization of law enforcement as the most important trend of the development of the post-Russian society. Thus, according to the author, the right of digital society develops tendencies, which, in general, are inherent in postmodern civilization and act as a natural manifestation.

As demonstrated in the article, the current stage of digital society is the development of legal communication, as characterized by a greater focus, compared with the preceding stages, on the general accuracy of the means of communicating the law, including digital media, as well as their further extraction from objects acting as referred signs. Consequently, digital design of law enforcement generates several problems that have not received an adequate solution.

The most important problems of this kind include anonymization of the subjects of legal interactions — first, states and legal entities and, in part, individuals also — as well as divorcing objects on which these relationships are being addressed. These trends generate a crisis of confidence among communication participants, which is a key problem of post-industrial law enforcement. To overcome such a crisis, the author offers the reconstruction of the rule of law based on human rights and freedoms, which means ensuring the stability and coherence of legal reality.

About the authors

Nicolay V. Razuvaev

North-Western Institute of RANEPA under President Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: nrasuvaev@yandex.ru

doctor of law, extraordinary professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Renault A. Era individa. K istorii sub’ektivnosti. Saint Petersburg: «Vladimir Dal’», 2002. 474 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Rodionova OM. Grajdansko-pravovaya priroda smart-kontraktov. Spaces in Russian legislation. 2017;(6):183–187. (In Russ.).
  3. Churakov RS. Eskrow-schet po rossiyskomu pravu. Law. 2007;(8):27–34. (In Russ.).
  4. Bourkova AYu. Eskrow-scheta: perspektivy v rossiyskom zakonodatel’stve. Russian laws: experience, analysis, practice. 2009;(1):53–56. (In Russ.).
  5. Dubnova DK. Eskrow schet v rossiyskom prave. Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy. 2016;5(112):83–86. (In Russ.).
  6. Baudrillard J. Simvolicheskiy obmen i smert. Moscow: Dobrosvet, 2001. 387 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Talapina EV. Pravo i tsifrovizatsiya: novye vyzovy i perspektivy. Journal of Russian Law. 2018;(2):5–17.
  8. Saveliev VA. Dogovornoe parvo 2.0: “Umnye” kontrakty kak nachalo kontsa dogovornogo prava. Bulletin of civil law. 2016;(3): 32–60. (In Russ.).
  9. Chestnov IL. Pravovaya kommunikatsiya v kontekste postklassicheskoy epistemologii. News of higher educational institutions. Pravovedenie. 2014;5(316):31–41. (In Russ.).
  10. Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti. Works in 6 Vols. Vol. 4. Ch. 1. Moscow: Thought, 1965. 543 p. (In Russ.).
  11. Razuvaev NV. Razmyshleniya o lichnostnom samosoznanii v antichnoy literature. Plato. History, right, politics. 2017;(2):20–33.
  12. Smirin VM. Sravnenie so smert’yu v yazike rimskih yuristov (“Rabstvo mi obychno sravnivaem so smert’yu”. Bulletin of ancient history. 1996;(1):136–141. (In Russ.).
  13. Morabito M. Les réalités de l’esclavage d’après le Digeste. Besançon; Paris: Université de Françe-Comte; Les Belles-Lettres Alub, 1981. 367 p.
  14. Kul’tura antichnogo Rima. Ed. ES Golubtsova. Vol. II. Moscow: Science, 1985. 397 p. (In Russ.).
  15. Solaiman SM. Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: a quest for legitimacy. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 2017;25(2):155–179.
  16. Ponkin IV, Redkin AI. Iskusstvenniy intellect s tochki zreniya prava. Courier of RUDN. 2018;22(1):91–109. (In Russ.).
  17. Khudyakova EA. K voprosu o pravovom statuse iskusstvennogo intellekta. Questions of Russian justice. 2020;(5):366–373. (In Russ.).
  18. Anderson P. Perehod ot antichnosti k feodalizmu. Moscow: Publishing House «The Territory of the Future», 2007. 242 p. (In Russ.).
  19. Rimskoye chastnoe parvo. Ed. I.B. Novitsky, I.S. Perenterstorsky. Moscow: Knourus, 2014. 608 p. (In Russ.).
  20. Nersesyanz VS. Pravo — matematika svobody. Opyt proshlogo i perspektivy. Moscow: Lawyer, 1996. 157 p. (In Russ.).
  21. Kuchta MS. Dizayn v informatsionnom obshestve: isheayuschaya funktsiya veschi. Proceedings of the Academy of Technical Aesthetics and Design. 2014;(2):36–38. (In Russ.).
  22. Baudrillard J. Sistema veschey. Moscow: Rudomino, 2001. 168 p. (In Russ.).
  23. Van Kraenkenburg R. The Internet of Things. A Critique of Ambient Technology and the All-Seeing Network of RFID. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Culture, 2008. 60 p. (In Russ.).
  24. McLuchan GM. Ponimaniye media: Vneshniye raschirenya cheloveka. Moscow; Zhukovsky: «Canon Press C», «Kuchkov Field», 2003. 464 p. (In Russ.).
  25. Ashton K. That “Internet of Things” Thing. RFID Journal. 2009;22(7):97–114. (In Russ.).
  26. Marx K. Economiko-filosofskiye rukopisi. Completed Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 42. P. 41–174. (In Russ.).
  27. Bulgakov SN. Filosophiya hozyaistva. Works In 2 volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow: Science, 1993. 603 p. (In Russ.).
  28. Spiridonov LI. Izbrannye trudy po teorii prava. Saint-Petersburg: Znanie, 2010. 523 p. (In Russ.).
  29. Marx K, Engels F. Manifest kommunisticheskoy partii. Moscow: Politizdat, 1982. 63 p. (In Russ.).
  30. Lenin VI. O zadacah narkomyusta v usloviyah novoy economicheskoy politiki. Completed Works. Vol. 44. P. 396–400.
  31. Trotsky LD. Voenniy kommunizm. Works. Vol. XII. Moscow; Leningrad: Gosizdat, 1925. P. 308–312. (In Russ.).
  32. Alekseev VP. Stanovlenie chelovechestva. Moscow: Politizdat, 1984. 462 p. (In Russ.).
  33. Vtoroe nachalo termodinamiki: Sadi Karno, V Thomson-Kelvin, R Clausius, L Boltzmann, M Smolukhovsky. Moscow: Gostichizdat, 1934. 311 p. (In Russ.).
  34. Fukuyama F. Konez istorii i posledniy chelovek. Moscow: AST, 2010. 588 p. (In Russ.).
  35. Weber M. Hozyaystvo i obschestvo: ocherki ponimayushey soziologii. Vol. 1. Sociology. Moscow: Publishing House of High School of Economics, 2016. 448 p. (In Russ.).
  36. Istoriya teoreticheskoy soziologii. In 4 vols. Ed. YuN Davydov. Vol. 2. Moscow: «Canon+», OI Rehabilitation, 2002. 553 p.
  37. Frege G. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik. 1892;(100):25–50.
  38. Ogden CK, Richards IA. The Meaning of Meaning. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World Inc., 1923. 576 p.
  39. Saussure F. Kurs obshey lingvistiki. Ekaterinburg: Publishing House of Urals University, 1999. 425 p. (In Russ.).
  40. Eco U. Iscezayuschaya satruktura: Vvedenie v semiologiyu. Saint-Petersburg: Symposium, 2006. 574 p. (In Russ.).
  41. Menninger K. Istoriya zifr: Chisla, simvoly, slova. Moscow: ZAO Centrpolygraph, 2013. 543 p. (In Russ.).
  42. Borges JL. Sochineniya. In 3 vols. Vol. 1. Essays. Novels. Moscow: “Polaris” Publishing House, 1997. 607 p. (In Russ.).
  43. Greenberg J. Antropologicheskaya lingvistika: vvodnyi kurs. Ed. 2nd. Moscow: URSS Editorial, 2009. 224 p. (In Russ.).
  44. Vereshchagin NK., Uspensky VA., Shen’ A. Kolmogorovskaya slojnost’ i algoritmicheskaya sluchaynost’. Moscow: MCNMO Publishing, 2013. 576 p. (In Russ.).
  45. Sapir E. Izbrannye trudy po lingvistike i kul’turologii. Moscow: Editional Group “Progress”, 2001. 656 p. (In Russ.).
  46. Whorf BL. Otnoshenie norm povedeniya i myshleniya k yazyku. Languages as the image of the world. Moscow; Saint-Petersburg: AST-AST LLC, Terra Fantastica, 2003. P. 157–201. (In Russ.).
  47. Martin-Löf P. Ocherki po konstruktivistskoy matematike. Moscow: World, 1975. 136 p. (In Russ.).
  48. Likhachev DS. Kontseptosfera russkogo yazyka. Izvestia RAS. Ser. Literature and language. 1993;52(1):3–9. (In Russ.).
  49. Lotman YuM. Semiosfera. Saint-Petersburg: Art - SPb, 2000. 704 p. (In Russ.).
  50. Prokhorov YuE. K probleme “kontsepta” i “kontseptosfery”. Language, consciousness, communication. Moscow: Max Press, 2005;(30):74–94. (In Russ.).
  51. Gachev GD. Mental’nosti narodov mira. Moscow: Algorithm, Eksmo, 2008. 544 p. (In Russ.).
  52. Stepanov YuS. Kontsept “prichina” i dva podhoda k logicheskomu analizu jazyka: logicheskiy i sublogicheskiy. Logical analysis of language. Cultural concepts. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. P. 5–14. (In Russ.).
  53. Howgen E. Jazykovye kontakty. New in linguistics. Vol. VI. Language contacts. Moscow: Progress, 1972. P. 61–80. (In Russ.).
  54. Spengler O. Zakat Evropy: Ocherki morfologii mirovoy istorii. Vol. 1. Image and reality. Minsk: Publishing House «Popurri», 1998. 668 p. Ushakov AA. Ocherki sovetskoy zakonodatel’noy stilistiki. Perm: Perm State University Publishing, 1967. 206 p. (In Russ.).
  55. Austin J. Slovo kak deystvie. New in overseas linguistics. Vol. XVII. Theory of speech acts. Moscow: Progress, 1986. P. 22–129. (In Russ.).
  56. Rejim zakonnosti v sovremennom rossiyskom obschestve. Ed. IL Chestnov. Saint-Petersburg: IVESEP, Znanie, 2004. 150 p. (In Russ.).
  57. Lessig L. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books, 1999. 320 p. (In Russ.).
  58. Boshno SV. Norma prava: svoystva, ponjatie, klassifikatsiya i struktura. Right and modern states. 2014;(4):49–60. (In Russ.).
  59. Spiridonov LI. Izbrannye trudy po teorii prava. Saint Petersburg: Znanie, 2010. 304 p. (In Russ.).
  60. Nashitz A. Pravotvorchestvo: Teoriya i zakonodatel’naya tehnika. Moscow: Progress, 1974. 256 p:
  61. Alekseev SS. Obshaya teoriya prava. Course in 2 volumes. Vol. II. Moscow: Jurid. lit., 1982. 360 p.
  62. Tikhomirov YuA. Teoriya prava. Moscow: Science, 1982. 257 p. (In Russ.).
  63. Kerimov DA. Kul’tura i technika zakonotvorchestva. Moscow: Jurid. lit., 1991. 160 p. (In Russ.).
  64. Kochubey AG., Boldyrev SN. Zakonodatel’naya technika v yuridicheskoy nauke: teoretiko-pravovye osobennosti. Philosophy of law. 2015;1(68):56–60. (In Russ.).
  65. Pokrovsky IA. Osnovnye problem gragdanskogo prava. Moscow: Statute, 1998. 353 p. (In Russ.).
  66. Chegovadze LA. O formal’noy opredelennosti deystviy sub’ektov grajdanskogo prava. Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2012;(11):82–88. (In Russ.).
  67. Golubeva LA. Netipichnye vetvi gosudarstvennoy vlasti. Scientists. Saint-Petersburg: RGPU of AI Herzen, 2008. P. 96–105.
  68. Beck U. Obschestvo riska: na puti k drugomu modernu. Moscow: Progress tradition, 2000. 384 p. (In Russ.).
  69. Habermas J. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Bd. 1. Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Razionalizierung. Frankfurt am Main: Zurkampf, 1981. 534 p.
  70. Polyakov AV. Kommunikativnyi smysl deystvitel’nosti prava, ego priznaniya i idei spravedlivosti. Legal communication of the state and society: domestic and foreign experience. Voronezh: Publishing House «Science-Unipress», 2020. P. 9–18. (In Russ.).
  71. Auerbach E. Mimesis: Izobragenie deysvitel’nosti v zapadnoevropeyskoy literature. Moscow: PER SE; Saint Petersburg: University Book, 2000. 512 p. (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2022 Razuvaev N.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies