About the Legal Nature of the Termination of Obligation in the Context of Modern Legislation

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

In this article, the author proposes a concept for understanding the termination of a civil obligation in the context of modern legislation. The study aimed to build a doctrine on the concept of the legal nature of the termination of obligations in the context of modern domestic legislation. To solve this, the study analyzed the available theoretical approaches, set out in theoretical studies and educational literature on determining the termination of an obligation. It further analyzed law enforcement practices to determine the answer to the question posed, as well as generalization and systematization of the data obtained. To solve the set tasks, the author analyzed the available approaches to understanding the termination of obligations. The paper presents the results of the research performed, based on the analysis of the current rules of civil legislation, aimed at regulating the issues of termination of obligations through the concept of existing legal links between the elements of the corresponding obligation relationship. The methodological basis of the research is the method of analysis, the sequential study of individual aspects, and the synthesis of the results obtained, integrating them into a single whole. The structural basis of the study is made up of aspects of law enforcement practice, in order to establish through them the desired concept, the study of the Soviet and sovereign civilian array, substantiating individual provisions of the declared topic, and building a general picture based on the results of a generalized analysis of the material presented. The study made it possible to conclude that when a civil obligation’s structure is destroyed, due to the interruption of legal ties between any of the elements, which constitutes the legal nature of the phenomenon under consideration, the obligation is terminated by operation of law.

About the authors

Andrey G. Ananiev

Ryazan State University named after S.A. Esenin

Author for correspondence.
Email: andrey-a-g@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9004-9259
SPIN-code: 3813-2320
ResearcherId: AAL-3043-2020

candidate of legal sciences, assistant professor

Russian Federation, Ryazan

References

  1. Sarbash SV. Elementarnaya dogmatika obyazatel’stv. Issled. centr chastn. prava im. SS Alekseeva pri Prezidentе RF, Ros. Shkola chastn. Prava. Moscow: Statut, 2017. 336 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Luk’yanova IN. Sdelki, napravlennye na prekrashchenie obyazatel’stv. Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS. 2016;(5):131–155. (In Russ.).
  3. Reutov NA. Osnovaniya prekrashcheniya obyazatel’stv. Eurasian scientific journal. 2015;(12):159–160. (In Russ.).
  4. Egorova MA. Pravovaya priroda osnovaniya prekrashcheniya obyazatel’stv. Russian laws: experience, analysis, practice. 2010;(12):3–13. (In Russ.).
  5. Egorova MA. Prekrashchenie obyazatel’stv: opyt sistemnogo issledovaniya pravovogo instituta: Monografiya. Moscow: Statut, 2014. 752 p. (In Russ.).
  6. Grazhdanskij kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii. Podrobnyj postatejnyj kommentarij s putevoditelem po zakonodatel’stvu i sudebnoj praktike. Chast’ 1. Moscow: Prospekt, 2017. 800 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Pokrovskij IA. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. Moscow: Statut, 1998. 353 p. (In Russ.).
  8. Sanfellipo Ch. Kurs rimskogo chastnogo prava. Moscow: BEK, 2002. 400 p. (In Russ.).
  9. Sinajskij VI. Russkoe grazhdanskoe parvo. Moscow: Statut, 2002. 638 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Ioffe OS. Izbrannye trudy: v 4 t. T. 3. Obyazatel’stvennoe parvo. Saint-Petersburg: Yuridicheskij centr Press, 2004. 837 p. (In Russ.).
  11. Dogovornoe i obyazatel’stvennoe pravo (obshchaya chast’): postatejnyj kommentarij k stat’yam 307–453 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii. Moscow: M-Logos, 2017. 1120 p. (In Russ.).
  12. Kviciniya NV. Problemy opredeleniya ponyatiya «obyazatel’stva» v svete izmenenij grazhdanskogo zakonodatel’stva. Business. Education. Right. Bulletin of the Volgograd Institute of Business. 2016;(2):190–195. (In Russ.).
  13. Shershenevich GF. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. Tula: Avtograf, 2001. 719 p. (In Russ.).
  14. Rozhkova MA. Sudebnyj akt i dinamika obyazatel’stv. Moscow: Statut, 2003. 140 p. (In Russ.).
  15. Ananev AG, Chajka IV. Prekrashchenie obyazatel’stv po osnovaniyam, ne svyazannym s ih fakticheskim ispolneniem: monografiya. Ryazan: Parus, 2008. 154 p. (In Russ.).
  16. Solomin SK. Ponyatie prekrashcheniya obyazatel’stva. Tomsk State University. Journal of Law. 2014;(2):117–122. (In Russ.).
  17. Halabudenko OA. K voprosu o ponyatii «obyazatel’stvo» i sistematizacii pravovogo materiala, posvyashchennogo obyazatel’stvennomu pravu, v evropejskoj pravovoj kul’ture. Problemy grazhdanskogo prava i processa: Sb. nauch. statej. Grodno: GrGU, 2017. P. 182–195. (In Russ.).
  18. Magomadova EI. Sushchnost’ ponyatiya «obyazatel’stvo» i sposoby ego prekrashcheniya v grazhdanskom prave. Colloquium-journal. 2019;(10–10):38–39. (In Russ.).
  19. Soboleva VE. Sistema osnovanij prekrashcheniya obyazatel’stv. Trends in the development of science and education. 2020;(62–16):72–75. (In Russ.).
  20. Vitushko VA. Ponyatie i social’naya priroda instituta prekrashcheniya obyazatel’stv = The concept and social nature of the institution of termination of obligations. Sovremennye problemy prava i upravleniya: Sb. dokladov 8-oj mezhdunarod. nauch. konf. Tula: Institut zakonovedeniya i upravleniya VPA, 2018. P. 30–35. (In Russ.).
  21. Popov IV. Prekrashchenie grazhdansko-pravovyh obyazatel’stv. Omsk: Omsk. yurid. akad., 2012. 119 p. (In Russ.).
  22. Hvostov VM. Sistema rimskogo prava. Moscow: Spark, 1996. 522 p. (In Russ.).
  23. Bahrieva ZR. Prekrashchenie obyazatel‘stv (obyazatel‘stvennogo pravootnosheniya). Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science. 2015;(1):229–236. (In Russ.).
  24. Krasavchikov OA. Yuridicheskie fakty v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave. Moscow: Gos. yur. izdat., 1958. 183 p. (In Russ.).
  25. Alekseev AA. Obshchaya teoriya prava. V 2 t. T. 2. Moscow: Yurid. lit., 1982. 360 p. (In Russ.).
  26. Komarov SA. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Saransk: Izd-vo Mordov. un-ta, 1997. 303 p. (In Russ.).
  27. Tarhov VA. Grazhdanskoe pravo (obshchaya chast’). Cheboksary: Chuvash. kn. izd-vo, 1997. 330 p. (In Russ.).
  28. Isakov VB. Yuridicheskie fakty po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu Moscow: Norma (Publishing house «Norma»), 2020. 144 p. (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2022 Ananiev A.G.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies