Reforming the Judicial and Legal Systems in South-Eastern Europe: Sociocultural Context and Consequences of European Union Policy
- Authors: Maslovskaya E.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Sociological Institute of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 12, No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 9-18
- Section: Trending topic
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2410-7522/article/view/313637
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RJLS679005
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OCQLCX
- ID: 313637
Cite item
Abstract
The paper describes the concept of sociological and legal transformation of the Bulgarian and Romanian judicial system after 1989. The theoretical framework of the study is a combination of concepts, including multiple modernities, historical sociology, and the sociology of law. Both countries are analytically combined into one typologic case. In particular, these countries are characterized by the Orthodox-Byzantine tradition, the legacy of Ottoman rule, and the method of creating national law by implementing the provisions of foreign law. Despite the distinctive features, the development of these countries during the socialism age had some common patterns. However, the rejection of the communist project did not lead to a complete separation from its legacy. Since the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union in 2007, the situation has altered. The paper describes the evolution of approaches to studying the Europeanization of the South-Eastern Europe. It shows that only the positive consequences of this process have been highlighted for a long time, whereas limitations of the EU’s influence on legal reforms in new member states were reported only in rare cases. The study shows that, since the mid-2010s, the researchers have focused on unhealthy influence of EU mechanisms and procedures on the transformation of legal institutions in Bulgaria and Romania, where the rule of law was insufficient at the time of their accession. The analysis identified that rapid reforms led to formal compliance rather than genuine adherence to the rule of law. Although the European Commission’s monitoring of Bulgaria and Romania under the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism was officially terminated in 2023, legal frameworks of both countries still have many defects. External legal reforms tend to consolidate the existing social order and governance principles based on the marginalization and instrumentalization of law. It is emphasized that the development of the rule of law system in these societies requires a fundamental change in the system of social relations. The paper concludes that the situation in Bulgaria and Romania shows some general trends in post-communist states associated with congenital errors in the reforms and the choice of their implementation methods.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Elena V. Maslovskaya
Sociological Institute of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: ev_maslovskaya@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9759-5298
SPIN-code: 8550-6742
Dr. Sci. (Sociology)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Arnason J. Designs and destinies: making sense of post-communism. Thesis Eleven. 2000;63(1):89–97. EDN: JQEVIV doi: 10.1177/0725513600063000008
- Kotkin S, Beissinger M. The historical legacies of communism: an empirical agenda. In: Beissinger M, Kotkin S, editors. Historical legacies of communism in Russia and Eastern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2014. P. 1–27. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107286191.001
- Maslovskaya EV, Maslovskiy MV. The Soviet version of modernity and its historical legacy: new theoretical approaches. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2020;20(1):7–17. EDN: DFNWKV doi: 10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-1-7-17
- Blokker P. Populist counter-constitutionalism, conservatism and legal fundamentalism. European Constitutional Law Review. 2019;15(3):519–543. doi: 10.1017/S157401961900035X
- Blokker P. On surprising persistence of modernization theory. Neprikosnovennyi zapas. Debaty o politike i kul'ture. 2022;(1):163–174. (In Russ.) EDN: GLENPB
- Mendelski M. The EU's pathological power: the failure of external rule of law promotion in South Eastern Europe. Southeastern Europe. 2015;39(3):318–346. doi: 10.1163/18763332-03903003
- Pridham G. Designing democracy: EU enlargement and regime change in post-communist Europe. New York: Palgrave; 2005. 284 p. doi: 10.1057/9780230504905
- Elbasani A, editor. European integration and transformation in the Western Balkans. Europeanization or business as usual? New York: Routledge; 2013. 232 p. EDN: WPJHVZ doi: 10.4324/9780203386064
- Piana D. The power knocks at the courts' back door: two waves of post-communist judicial reforms. Comparative Political Studies. 2009;42(6): 816–840. doi: 10.1177/0010414009333049
- Mendelski M. EU-driven judicial reforms in Romania: a success story? East European Politics. 2012;28(1):23–42. doi: 10.1080/13523279.2011.636806 EDN: XSYXPB
- Parau C. Explaining governance of the judiciary in Central and Eastern Europe: external incentives, transnational elites and parliamentary inaction. Europe-Asia Studies. 2015;67(3):409–442. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2015.1016401
- Börzel T, Pamuk Y. Pathologies of Europeanisation: fighting corruption in the Southern Caucasus. West European Politics. 2012;35(1):79–97. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.631315
- Mungiu-Pippidi A. The legacies of 1989: the transformative power of Europe revisited. Journal of Democracy. 2014;25(1):20–32. doi: 10.1353/jod.2014.0003
- Sadurski W. Accession's democracy dividend: the impact of the EU enlargement upon democracy in the new member states of Central and Eastern Europe. European Law Journal. 2004;10(4):371–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2004.00222.x EDN: FOZQAJ
- Slapin J. How European Union membership can undermine the rule of law in emerging democracies. West European Politics. 2015;38(3):627–648. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.996378
- Alter K. Establishing the supremacy of European law: the making of an international rule of law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001. 284 p.
- Schönfelder B. Judicial independence in Bulgaria: a tale of splendour and misery. Europe-Asia Studies. 2005;57(1):61–92. doi: 10.1080/0966813052000314110
- Coman R. Quo vadis judicial reforms? The quest for judicial independence in Central and Eastern Europe. Europe-Asia Studies. 2014;66(6):892–924. EDN: WQQVAJ doi: 10.1080/09668136.2014.905385
- Parau C. The drive for judicial supremacy. In: Seibert-Fohr A, editor. Judicial independence in transition. New York: Springer; 2011. P. 619–665. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-28299-7_16
- Sadurski W, editor. Constitutional justice, East and West: democratic legitimacy and constitutional courts in post-communist Europe in a comparative perspective. Kluwer International; 2002. 453 p.
- Iancu B. Constitutionalism in perpetual transition: the case of Romania. In: Iancu B, editor. The law/politics distinction in contemporary public law adjudication. Eleven International Publishing; 2009. P. 187–211.
- Dimitrov G, Plachkova A. Bulgaria and Romania, twin Cinderellas in the European Union: how they contributed in a peculiar way to the change in EU policy fot the promotion of democracy and the rule of law. European Politics and Society. 2021;22(2):167–184. doi: 10.1080/23745118.2020.1729946 EDN: CSLEDX
- Krygier M. The rule of law and state legitimacy. In: Sadurski W, Sevel M, Walton K, editors. Legitimacy: the state and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019. P. 106–136. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198825265.003.0007
- Iancu B. Post-accession constitutionalism with a human face: judicial reform and lustration in Romania. European Constitutional Law Review. 2010;6:28–58. doi: 10.1017/S1574019610100030
Supplementary files
