Qualification of Crimes Related to the Use of Modern Electronic Entities: the Experience of Germany

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Comprehensive legal regulation of relations arising in connection with the development of the digital economy currently involves the establishment of the grounds and conditions for bringing persons to responsibility for illegal actions in the new crypto sphere of legal relations, including criminal liability. At the same time, this issue is most acute in connection with the emergence and evolution of crypto - currencies-digital entities that erase any boundaries, allowing you to «move away» from accounting for income, paying taxes, controlling financial flows, and so on. The latter is related to the risks and threats posed by this «new money». After all, unlike the use of digital technologies (i.e. the appropriate software) for criminal purposes, where a certain qualification of the attacker is required, almost everyone can use the cryptocurrency to commit illegal actions. Since 2013, the German Government began to recognize Bitcoin as a digital currency, indicating that such currency does not apply to electronic money or to the so-called «functional» currency (including foreign currency). In the future, virtual currencies in Germany were recognized as a financial instrument (2017), and in the banking legislation of Germany they were recognized as private funds and specific units of financial accounting. The article analyzes some aspects of the qualification of crimes related to the use of modern electronic entities in Germany.

About the authors

D A Pechegin

Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the RF

Email: crim5@izak.ru

References

  1. Зигмунт О. А. Кибер- и интернет-преступность в Германии и России: возможности сравнительного исследования // Юридическая наука и правоохранительная практика. 2015. № 4(34). С. 180-188.
  2. Кучеров И. И. Криптовалюта (идеи правовой идентификации и легитимации альтернативных платежных средств). М., 2018. 204 с.
  3. Мансуров Г. З. К проблеме пределов применения денежных суррогатов // Банковское право. 2004. № 4. С. 19-22.
  4. Печегин Д. А. Крипториски // РЖПИ. 2017. № 3. С. 151-157.
  5. Талапина Э. В. Право и цифровизация: новые вызовы и перспективы // Журнал российского права. 2018. № 2. С. 5-17.
  6. Хабриева Т. Я. Право перед вызовами цифровой реальности // Журнал российского права. 2018. № 9. С. 5-16.
  7. Хабриева Т. Я., Черногор Н. Н. Право в условиях цифровой реальности // Журнал российского права. 2018. № 1. С. 85-102.
  8. Brenig C., Accorsi R., Müller G. Economic Analysis of Cryptocurrency Backed Money Laundering // ECIS Completed Research Papers. 2015. Paper 20; https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2015_cr/20/.
  9. Bryans D. Bitcoin and Money Laundering: Mining for an Effective Solution // 89 Ind. L.J. 441. 2014; https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317990.
  10. Grzywotz J., Köhler O., Rückert C. Cybercrime mit Bitcoins - Straftaten mit virtuellen Währungen, deren Verfolgung und Prävention // StV. 2016. № 11. P. 753-759.
  11. Luther W. J. Bitcoin and the Future of Digital Payments. 14 p.; https://ssrn.com/abstract=2631314.
  12. Pechegin D. A. Criminal Responsibility in the Cryp­tosphere // European Researcher. Series A. 2018. № 9(1). P. 50-57; http://www.erjournal.ru/journals_n/1521800996.pdf.
  13. Polasik M., Piotrowska A., Wisniewski T., Kotkowski R., Lightfoot G. Price Fluctuations and the Use of Bitcoin: An Empirical Inquiry // 20(1) International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 2015; https://ssrn.com/abstract=2516754.

Copyright (c) 2018 Pechegin D.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies