Historical Aspect and Prerequisites for Amending the Constitution of the RF

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The following article examines aspects of the United States Agency for International Collaboration (USAID) programs influence in the rule of law field, started in the USSR during the early 90s. USAID-funded Rule of Law implementers helped draft the Russian Constitution, Part I of the Russian Civil Code, and the Russian Tax Code. The American Bar Association of the USA took an active part in changing Russian legislation since 1992, which was also funded by the USAID. The Constitution of 1993 included a provision on the priority of international law over national legislation. This provision was also included in Article 1 of the Criminal Code and in Article 1 of the Russian Code of Criminal Procedure. The article also deals with an enshrined supremacy of the Constitution found in the US Constitution and that of the European countries. For example, if there is a conflict between constitutional provisions and an international treaty, priority is given to the Constitution. Not all states recognize certain norms and implement them, just as legal practice is not always identical. Attempts to introduce alien values, ideologies, cultures and traditions, all the more with the help of international law, pose a threat to the democratic foundations of the Constitution as a legal act that has the highest legal force in the legal system of the state. The author suggests that the text of the Constitution of the Russian Federation would see the provision removed, according to which international law forms an integral part of the legal system of the Russian Federation. Amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation will strengthen Russia’s independence in the sphere of law, bringing back the best traditions of the functioning state authorities and judicial bodies, which should correspond to the current development of Russian society. Keywords: international law, constitutional law, the rule of law, double standards, human rights.

About the authors

V A Jilkin

Law Office Kari Korhonen, Helsinki

Email: info@lawcenter.fi

References

  1. Жилкин В.А. Комментарий к решению ЕСПЧ по делу ОАО Нефтяная компания «Юкос» против России // Российский судья. 2017. № 3. С. 59.
  2. Зорькин В.Д. Доклад на международной конференции, посвященной 65-летию Нюрнбергского процесса. Санкт-Петербург. 16.05.2011.
  3. Послание Президента В.В. Путина Федеральному Собранию 25 апреля 2005 г.
  4. Решение Конституционного Суда РФ от 13.05.2005 по делу № 2004-18-0106.
  5. Case of Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2). 6 October 2005, Case of Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia. 4 July 2013.
  6. Clinton H. Hard Choices. Simon & Schuster Inc. 2014.
  7. Giancarlo Parretti v. United States. 112 F.3d 1363. U.S. Court of Appeals, May 6, 1997.
  8. Morningstar R. U.S. Government Assistance to and Cooperative Activities with the NIS of the Former Soviet Union: Quarterly Report, July-September 1995, U.S. Department of State, September 1995.
  9. Peter C. Ordeshook and Tomas Scwartz. A Constitution for the Russian Federation. Working paper No. 51. Centre for Institutional Reform and the Informal Sector. May, 1993. P. 2.
  10. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Nov. 13, 1987.
  11. U.S. Supreme Court. Murray v. The Charming Betsey, 6 U.S. 2 Cranch 64 64 (1804).
  12. USAID from American people. Russia Rule of Law Assessment. This report was produced for the United States Agency for International Development by DPK Consulting. April, 2008.

Copyright (c) 2017 Jilkin V.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies