Dialectical and activity-based foundations for the modern original definition of science
- Authors: Sorokin R.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
- Issue: Vol 21, No 3-4 (2021)
- Pages: 22-30
- Section: Philosophical sciences
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2410-3764/article/view/89696
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/2072-2354.2021.21.2.22-30
- ID: 89696
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article is devoted to the actual problem of uncertainty in science. The work done not only contributes to the removal/solution of this modern problem, but also contributes to the theoretical understanding of the need for qualitative changes in the sphere of scientific activity, the most organic combination of theory with practice to form a new form of science, guaranteed to remove the global dangers and uncertainties of scientific and technological development. The author presents the basis for the formation of a modern, general definition of science, the absence of which indicates the presence of the above problem. The aim of the research is to give a modern general definition of science, making a serious step, if not to the final solution, then to a generally meaningful solution of this problem. In the author’s opinion, all substantive elements necessary for forming a modern general definition of science have already been identified, but they are not structured. The methodological approach has a high importance in solving this problem, and the emphasis should be placed on dialectics, rather than formal logic. In dialectical methodology, it is necessary to refer to the theory of dialectical development from the abstract to the concrete, as well as the general theory of activity. The specificity of science is defined in the consistent disclosure of the content of science as knowledge, as individual-collective, internalist-externalist activity and as a sphere of social life. As a result of the analysis of these aspects the author comes to the initial, general and actual definition of science.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Roman V. Sorokin
National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Author for correspondence.
Email: Romsor36@mail.ru
Postgraduate student of the Department of Philosophy
Russian Federation, Nizhny NovgorodReferences
- Agudov VV. Voshozhdenie ot abstraktnogo k konkretnomu. In: Dialektika nauchnogo poznanija. Ocherk dialekticheskoj logiki. Moscow: Nauka; 1978. P. 172–198. (In Russ.)
- Alekseev IS. Nauka. In: Filosofskij jenciklopedicheskij slovar’. Moscow: Sovetskaja jenciklopedija; 1989. (In Russ.)
- Arshinov VI, Budanov VG. Paradigm of complexity and socio-humanitarian projections of convergent technologies. Voprosy filosofii. 2016;(1):59–70. (In Russ.)
- Bernal J. Nauka v istorii obshchestva : per. s angl. Ed. by B.M. Kedrova, I.V. Kuznecova. Moscow; 1956. (In Russ.)
- Verkhoturov AD, Makienko VM, Voronov BA, Konevtsov LA. On a new definition of science with regard to the need of resolving mankind’’s global problems, including environment. Scientific Notes of Komsomolsk-on-Amour State Technical University. 2013;1(3(15)):86–93. (In Russ.)
- Vitgenshtejn L. Filosofskie issledovanija. In: Jazyki kak obraz mira. Moscow: AST; 2006. P. 220–546. (In Russ.)
- Gorsky DP, Ivin AA, Nikiforov AL. Kratkij slovar’ po logike. Moscow: Prosveshhenie; 1991. (In Russ.)
- Gubanov NN, Gubanov NI, Cheremnyh LG, Shorikova ЕS. Ethos of science. Gumanitarnyj vestnik. 2020;(3(83)):1. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18698/2306-8477-2020-3-666
- Dobren’kov VI, Osipova NG. Metodologija i metody nauchnoj raboty: uchebnoe posobie. Moscow; 2009. (In Russ.)
- Ivin AA. Sovremennaja filosofija nauki. 2-e izd. Moscow, Berlin: Direkt-Media; 2015. (In Russ.)
- Istorija i filosofija nauki (Filosofija nauki): uchebnoe posobie. Ed. by Ju.V. Krjanev, L.E. Motorina. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ.)
- Kasavin IT. Nauka – gumanisticheskij proekt. Moscow; 2020. (In Russ.)
- Kudrjashova TB. A.N. Portnov on “the power of language”. Izvestija vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2017;8(2):93–97. (In Russ.)
- Kulikov SB. The conceptual model of transformations of philosophical images of science. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2011;(13(115)):169–173. (In Russ.)
- Kulikov SB. Processy transformacii filosofskih obrazov nauki. Tomsk; 2012. (In Russ.)
- Kulikov SB. Specifics of images of the science in modern philosophy. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2012;(2):48–52. (In Russ.)
- Kulikov SB.Transformacija filosofskih obrazov nauki: [dissertation]. Tomsk, 2012. (In Russ.) Available from: https://dlib.rsl.ru/viewer/01005019543#?page=6. Accessed: 21.04.2021.
- Levin GD. Dialektiko-materialisticheskaja teorija vseobshhego. Ed. by A.P. Sheptulin. Moscow: Nauka; 1987. (In Russ.)
- Maslov VM, Horunzhij VP. Generic definition and axiology of science/science spheres. Izvestija vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Serija: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2017;8(3):196–200. (In Russ.)
- Melik-Gaikazyan IV. Conceptual model of diagnostics of technologies of the information society. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2010;5(95):42–51. (In Russ.)
- Polikarpov VS. Istorija nauki i tehniki: uchebnoe posobie dlja studentov vuzov. Rostov-na-Donu; 1999. (In Russ.)
- Popper K. Otkrytoe obshchestvo i ego vragi: v 2 t. Vol. 1. Chary Platona. Moscow; 1992. (In Russ.)
- Spirkin AG. Filosofija: uchebnik dlja studentov vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. 2-e izd. Moscow; 2008. (In Russ.)
- Fejnman R, Lejton R, Sjends M. Fejnmanovskie lekcii po fizike. Moscow; 1976. Vol. 1. (In Russ.)
- Filosofija nauki v voprosah i otvetah: Uchebnoe posobie dlja aspirantov. (authors) V.P. Kokhanovskii, T.B. Fatkhi, T.G. Leshkevich, T.P. Matyash. Rostov-na-Donu; 2006. (In Russ.)
- Filosofija. Osnovnye idei i principy: Populjarnyj ocherk. Ed. by A.I. Rakitov. Moscow; 1990. (In Russ.)
- Filosofija. Uchebnoe posobie. Ed. by S.A. Hmelevskaya. Moscow; 2002. (In Russ.)
- Shkljar MF. Osnovy nauchnyh issledovanij. Uchebnoe posobie. Moscow; 2008. (In Russ.)
- Kulikov SB. Scientific ethos and foundations of conscious activity. Integrative psychological and behavioral science. 2020;54(1):158–178. doi: 10.1007/s12124-019-09483-6
- Merton RK. The sociology of science. Chicago: Chicago University Press; 1973. P. 267–278. doi: 10.7312/calh15112
Supplementary files
