The Evolution of Chieftaincy Power in Ghana’s Political Governance: From Historical Legacy to Contemporary Role
- Authors: Medushevsky N.A.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Russian State University for the Humanities
- RUDN University
- Issue: Vol 27, No 4 (2025): Politics in Africa and Africa in Politics
- Pages: 816-832
- Section: СOUNTRY-SPECIFIC CASE STUDIES
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2313-1438/article/view/365383
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2025-27-4-816-832
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GCNMMZ
- ID: 365383
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The presented research provides an up-to-date view of the institution of traditional authority - the power of chiefs, in modern Ghana. Despite the fact that their political influence has changed over the course of history, Chiefs in Ghana are still politically authoritative figures, influence the electoral process, manage tribal lands and implement local, normatively unregulated forms of community governance and legal proceedings in the role of a «justice of the peace». This role of chiefs in society raises the problem of their political inclusion in the system of governance at different levels and their status as influencers in election campaigns. In this regard, the aim of the work is to study the modern political role of chiefs in the system of socio-political relations in Ghana with an emphasis on the historical transformation of this role in the postcolonial period. To this end, the author applies a structural-functional approach to the analysis of the role of chiefs in the system of political power in Ghana, a normative-legal analysis to present the legal dimension of their activities and a retrospective analysis to present the evolution of their powers, functions, and, as a consequence, political influence. The example of the Republic of Ghana, considered in this article, clearly demonstrates that even one of the most developed democratic systems in Africa has a pronounced traditionalist political dimension. Despite the fact that the country’s constitution does not allow chiefs to participate in elections at all levels as candidates, the political reality demonstrates their deep involvement in the political process on an informal basis. Authority in tribal communities and the right to dispose of the historical land of the tribe makes them priority agents of political influence in the national electoral system. As the study shows, it is their support that largely determines the victory of not only members of parliament, but also presidents of the country. In this regard, the political process in Ghana appears as quasi-democratic and based on traditional forms of power, which act as an informal platform for the political struggle of parties and elites.
About the authors
Nikolaj A. Medushevsky
Russian State University for the Humanities; RUDN University
Author for correspondence.
Email: Lucky5659@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0475-6713
Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor of the Department of Modern East and Africa, Chief Researcher of the Center for Applied African Studies, Russian State University for the Humanities, Professor of the Department of Comparative Political Science, RUDN University
Moscow, Russian FederationReferences
- Amamoo, J.G. (1958). The new Ghana: The birth of a nation. London: Pan Books.
- Amanor, K.S. (2022). Land administration, chiefs, and governance in Ghana. In Takeuchi Shinichi (Ed.), African Land Reform Under Economic Liberalisation. Singapor: Springer.
- Ansa-Koi, K. (1998). Walking a political tightrope: Chiefs, chieftaincy and the 1996 elections in Ghana. In J.R.A. Ayee (Ed.), The 1996 general elections and democratic consolidation in Ghana (pp. 143–151). Accra: Gold-Type Ltd.
- Apter, D. (1963). Ghana in transition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Arhin, K. (2001). Transformations in traditional rule in Ghana (1951–1996). Accra: Sedco.
- Asiamah, E.A.E. (2000). The mass factor in rural politics: The case of the Asafo revolution in Kwahu political history. Accra: Ghana Universities Press.
- Benion, F.A.R. (1962). The constitutional law of Ghana. London: Butterworths.
- Berry, S. (2013). Questions of ownership: Proprietorship and control in a changing rural terrain — A case study from Ghana. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, 83(1), 35–56.
- Boafo-Arthur, K. (2001). Chieftaincy and politics in Ghana since 1982. West Africa Review, 3(1),
- Boateng, K., & Afranie, S. (2020). Chieftaincy: An anachronistic institution within a democratic dispensation? The case of a traditional political system in Ghana. Journal of Development Studies, 17(1), 25–47.
- Elias, T.O. (1962). Ghana and Sierra Leone. London: Stevens and Son Ltd.
- Gyamp, E. (2011). Chiefs and electoral politics in Ghana’s Fourth Republic. Ransford humanities review journal, 8(1), 1–23.
- Ivanov, A.D. (2024). History of the development of local self-government in the Republic of Ghana. Law and Right, 6, 77–80. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2023-4-316-331 EDN: ZUNSAV.
- Jonah, K. (2003). The electoral response of Ghana’s traditional rulers to their subordination and alienation in local governance. In N. Amponsah and K. Boafo-Arthur (Ed.), Local government in Ghana: Grassroots participation in the 2002 local government elections (pp. 213–219). Accra: Livog Ltd.
- Kachim, J.U. (2020). The paradox of democratization in Africa: Chieftaincy, land rights and Konkomba exclusion in northern Ghana in the 1990s. Southern Journal of Contemporary History, 45(1), 57–75.
- Kachim, J.U. (2020). The paradox of democratization in Africa: Chieftaincy, land rights and Konkomba exclusion in northern Ghana in the 1990s. Southern Journal of Contemporary History, 45(1), 57–75.
- Kasanga, K., & Kotey, N.A. (2001). Land management in Ghana: Building on tradition and modernity. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
- Kimble, D. (1965). A political history of Ghana. Clarendon: Oxford University Press.
- Konings, P. (1986). The state and rural class formation in Ghana: A comparative analysis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Korotaev, A.V., Isaev, L.M., & Shishkina, A.R. (2023). Factors of socio-political stability in Ghana. Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: Political Science. History. International Relations, 4(3), 316–331. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2023-4-316-331 EDN: ZUNSAV.
- Ksenofontova, N.A. (2023). Traditional African culture in the context of modernity: Between archaism and modernization. Asia and Africa Today, 8, 79–82. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S032150750027145-1 EDN: GIVSIU.
- Medushevsky, N.A., & Vishnyakov, M.D. (2025). Presidential elections in Ghana from the position of historical continuity of national political practices. Modern Science: Actual Problems of Theory and Practice. Series «Humanities», 3, 11–15. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.37882/2223-2982.2025.03.24 EDN: EKQIWO.
- Owusu-Mensah, I. (2013). Politics, chieftaincy and customary law in Ghana. In G. Wahlers (Ed.), Tradition and justice (pp. 31–48). Berlin: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
- Rathbone, R. (2000). Nkrumah & the Chiefs: Politics of chieftaincy in Ghana, 1951–1960 (Western African Studies). Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.
- Sidorova, G.M. (2015). Traditional power in the political process of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Bulletin of the Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia, 1(3), 55–67. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-3313-2024-6-77-80 EDN: OWVOCS.
- Tsikata, D., & Seine, W. (2004). Identities, inequalities and conflicts in Ghana. Oxford: University of Oxford.
- Ubink, J.M., & Quan, J.F. (2008). How to combine tradition and modernity? Regulating customary land management in Ghana. Land Use Policy, 25(2), 198–213.
- Yaro, J.A. (2012). Re-inventing traditional land tenure in the era of land commoditization: Some consequences in periurban northern Ghana. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 94(4), 351–368.
Supplementary files
