Employment of persons with disabilities: opportunities, priorities and outcomes of active policies in welfare states. Part two

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This two-part article examines the active employment policies of welfare states and their impact on the situation of persons with disabilities of working age. On the basis of research materials and data from population surveys in the EU and OECD countries, the article analyzes the trends of active employment policy towards persons with moderate and severe disabilities in welfare states of different models for the period from 2010 to 2020. The second part of the article reveals the approaches of active policy to the selection of priority groups of citizens with disabilities to direct social investments in the promotion of labor, to the redistribution of responsibilities towards employers in traditional forms of employment: special workshops and job quota systems, to the provision of social guarantees in the conditions of de-regulation of the labor market. It shows the resources of traditional forms of employment, preferences of employees and employers that influence the expansion of employment opportunities. The potential of active policy measures is considered: the possibilities of hiring workers with disabilities with different degrees of impairment and reducing unemployment, as well as the sustainability of the results of fixation in the labor market. The forms and conditions of employment of persons with disabilities in the conditions of labor market deregulation, job quality factors and the level of social guarantees are revealed. The results of active policy in achieving self-sufficiency in the transition from social security to labor and the assessment of their sustainability are presented.

About the authors

Elena V. Kulagina

Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population of FCTAS RAS

Email: elkulagina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5342-7847
SPIN-code: 9548-1559
ResearcherId: N-1381-2017
Candidate of Economy, Leading Researcher Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Grammenos St. European comparative data on Europe 2020 and persons with disabilities. Labour market, education, poverty and health analysis and trends. European Commission. Luxembourg : Publications Office of the European Union, 2022. doi: 10.2767/745317.
  2. Disability, Work and Inclusion. Mainstreaming in All Policies and Practices. Paris : OECD, 2022. doi: 10.1787/1eaa5e9c-en.
  3. Zukunft der Werkstätten – Perspektiven für und von Menschen mit Behinderung zwischen Teilhabe-Auftrag und Mindestlohn / Hrsg. : V. Schachler, W. Schlummer, R.Weber. Bad
  4. Heilbrunn : Verlag Julius Klinkhardt; Lebenshilfe Verlag der Bundesvereinigung, 2023. 333 р. doi: 10.25656/01:26510.
  5. Characteristics of individuals receiving disability benefits in the Netherlands and predictors of leaving the disability benefit scheme: a retrospective cohort study with five-year follow-up / I. Louwerse, M. A. Huysmans, H. J. van Rijssen [et al.] // BMC Public Health. 2018. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 157. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5068-7.
  6. Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers. A Synthesis of Findings across OECD countries. Paris : OECD, 2010. 166 p. doi: 10.1787/9789264088856-en.
  7. Lillestø B., Sandvin J. T. Limits to vocational inclusion?: Disability and the social democratic conception of labour // Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research. 2014, Vol. 16, № 01. Р. 45–58. doi: 10.1080/15017419.2012.735203.
  8. Grammenos St. European comparative data on Europe 2020 & People with disabilities. 2013. URL: https://includ-ed.eu/sites/default/files/documents/aned_2013_task_6_-_comparative_data_synthesis_report_-_europe2020_final.pdf (дата обращения: 13.10.2024).
  9. Grammenos St. European comparative data on persons with disabilities. Equal opportunities, fair working conditions, social protection and inclusion, health analysis and trends – Data 2020, European Commission. Luxembourg : Publications Office of the European Union, 2023. doi: 10.2767/67323.
  10. Dengler K. Effectiveness of Active Labour Market Programmes on the Job Quality of Welfare Recipients in Germany // Journal of Social Policy. 2019. Vol. 48, № 4. Р. 807–838. doi: 10.1017/S0047279419000114.
  11. Albinowski M., Magda I., Rozszczypala A. The Employment Effect of the Disability Education Gap in Europe. Bonn : IZA – Institute of Labor Economics, 2024. 24 р. doi: 10.1080/096 45292.2024.2395564.
  12. Lo S. H., Ville Is. The “employability” of disabled people in France: A labile and speculative notion to be tested against the empirical data from the 2008 “Handicap-Santé” study // ALTER: European Journal of Disability Research. 2013. Vol. 7, № 4. Р. 227–243. doi: 10.1016/j.alter.2013.09.007.
  13. Reasonable Accommodation and Sheltered Workshops for People with Disabilities: Costs and Returns of Investments. Brussels European Union. European Parlament. 2015. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/536295/IPOL_STU(2015)536295_EN.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
  14. Fostering Employment through Sheltered Workshops: Reality, Trends and Next Steps / L. Bezzina , J. Žutautaitė, F. Belafatti, E. Paulauskaitė. Brussels European Association of Service Providers for Persons with Disabilities (EASPD). 2022. URL: https://easpd.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Fostering_Employment_through_Sheltered_Workshops_Reality__Trends_and_Next_Steps_2.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
  15. Behinderung & Beruf und soziale Entschädigung. BIH-Jahresbericht 2020–2021. Hürth: Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft der Integrationsämter und Hauptfürsorgestellen (BIH). 2021. URL: file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/BIH_Jahresbericht_2021_barrierefrei_pdf-ua. pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
  16. Entwicklung der Zugangszahlen zu Werkstätten für behinderte Menschen: im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Arbeit und Soziales / W. Detmar, M. Gehrmann, F. König [et al.]. Berlin : Gesellschaft für Integration, Sozialforschung und Betriebspädagogik (ISB) gGmbH. 2008. URL: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-342577 (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
  17. Flüter-Hoffmann Chr., Kurtenacker A., Schmidt J. Menschen mit Beeinträchtigungen auf dem Arbeitsmarkt. Erwerbsbeteiligung, Beschäftigungsstrukturen und persönliche Einschätzungen. IW-Analysen 147. Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft. 2021. URL: file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/Analysen_147_Teilhabe-4.pdf (дата обращения: 13.10.2024).
  18. Metzler Chr., Werner D. Die Erwerbssituation von Menschen mit Behinderung // IWTrends. 2017. Vol. 44, № 4. Р. 21–38.
  19. Greve B. The labour market situation of disabled people in European countries and implementation of employment policies: a summary of evidence from country reports and research studies. April 2009. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/empl_portal/ede/ANED%20Task%206%20final%20report%20-%20final%20version%2017-04-09.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
  20. Employment Outlook 2009. Tackling the Jobs Crisis. Paris : OECD, 2009. doi: 10.1787/empl_outlook-2009-en.
  21. Mattern L., Rambausek-Haß T., Wansing G. Das Budget für Arbeit: Ausgewählte Ergebnisse einer explorativen Studie zu seiner Umsetzung – Teil II: Ausgestaltung und sozialversicherungsrechtliche Fragestellungen. 2021. URL: https://www.reha-recht.de/fileadmin/user_upload/RehaRecht/Diskussionsforen/Forum_D/2021/D10-2021_Das_Budget_f%C3%BCr_Arbeit_Teil_II.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
  22. Bambra C., Whitehead M., Hamilton V. Does “welfare-to-work” work? A systematic review of the effectiveness of the UK’s welfare-to-work programmes for people with a disability or chronic illness // Social Science and Medicine. 2005. Vol. 60, № 9. Р. 1905–1918. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.09.002.
  23. Promoting Employment Opportunities for People with Disabilities. Quota Schemes. Vol. 1. International Labour Organization. 2019. URL: https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_emp/@ifp_skills/documents/publication/wcms_735531.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
  24. Fuchs M. Quota Systems for Disabled Persons: Parameters, Aspects, Effectivity. Policy Brief. 2014. Vienna: European Centre. URL: https://www.euro.centre.org/downloads/detail/1459/1 (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
  25. Richard S., Hennekam S. When Can a Disability Quota System Empower Disabled Individuals in the Workplace? The Case of France // Work Employment and Society. 2020. Vol. 35, № 5. doi: 10.1177/0950017020946672.
  26. Bambra C. Form Quotas to Sanction: The Political Economy of Rehabilitation in UK // New Dynamics of Disability and Rehabilitation: Interdisciplinary Perspectives / Eds. I. Haarslof, I. Poulser, K. Larsen. Singapore : Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. Р. 69–96. doi: 10.1007/978981-13-7346-6.
  27. Kubin T., Tratt B. Aktuelle Ausbildungs- und Beschäftigungssituation von Menschen mit Behinderung im Handwerk. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung. München : Deutsche Handwerkinstitut, 2023. URL: https://lfi-muenchen.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Aktuelle-Ausbildungs-und-Beschaeftigungssituation-von-MiB-im-HW. pdf (дата обращения: 13.10.2024).
  28. Geiger B. В. Benefits conditionality for disabled people: stylised facts from a review of international evidence and practice // Journal of Poverty and Social Justice. 2017. Vol. 25, № 2. Р. 107–28. doi: 10.1332/175982717X14939739331010.
  29. Work, welfare, and wellbeing: The impacts of welfare conditionality on people with mental health impairments in the UK / P. Dwyer, L. Scullion, K. Jones [et al.] // Social Policy & Administration. 2020. Vol. 54, № 2. Р. 311–326. doi: 10.1111/spol.12560.
  30. Gjersøe H. M. Regulating inflow or outflow: a comparison of the work capability assessments in the UK and Norway // Journal of Social Policy. 2015. Vol. 45, № 1. Р. 141–158. doi: 10.1017/S0047279415000471.
  31. Fichtl A. Mini- and Midi-Job in Germany. Effects of Marginal Employment on Une mployment // FORES Policy Paper. 2015. № 3. Р. 01–54. URL: https://fores.se/publikation/mini-and-midi-jobs-in-germany/ (дата обращения: 27.10.2024).
  32. Disability and employment – lessons from reforms / Eds. M. Kautto, J. Bach-Othman. Helsinki : Helsinki Finnish Centre for Pensions, 2010. 85 p. ISBN 978-951-691-132-1.
  33. Fothergil S. Welfare-to-work isn’t working // People, Place and Policy. 2013. Vol. 7, № 2. Р. 61–65. doi: 10.3351/ppp.0007.0002.0002.
  34. Graf T., Rudolph H. Dynamik im SGB II 2005–2007. Viele Bedarfsgemeinschaften bleiben lange bedürftig, IAB-Kurzbericht 05/2009, Nuremberg.
  35. Gaskarth G. The Hartz Reforms ...and their lesson for the UK. Centre for Policy Studies. 2014. URL: https://cps.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/141024133732-TheHartzReforms.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2024).
  36. Parker S., Cass B. New Paradigms of Disability in Social Security Law and Policy in Australia: Implications for Participation // Disability Studies Quarterly. 2005. Vol. 25, № 4. Р. 1–26. doi: 10.18061/dsq.v25i4.621.
  37. Edmiston D. Welfare, Austerity and Social Citizenship in the UK // Social Policy and Society. 2016. Vol. 16, № 2. Р. 261–270. doi: 10.1017/S1474746416000531.
  38. Black D., Daniel K., Sanders S. The impact of economic conditions on participation in disability programs: Evidence from the coal boom and bust // The American Economic Review. 2002. Vol. 92, № 1. Р. 27–50. doi: 10.1257/000282802760015595.
  39. Rauch A., Dornette J. Equal Rights and Equal Duties? Activating Labour Market Policy and the Participation of Long-term Unemployed People with Disabilities after the Reform of the German Welfare State // Journal of Social Policy. 2010. Vol. 39, № 01. Р. 53–70. doi: 10.1017/S0047279409990419.
  40. Bound J., Burkhauser R. V. Economic Analysis of Transfer Programs Targeted on People with Disabilities // Handbook of Labor Economics / Eds. O. Ashenfelter, D. Card. Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1999. Vol. 3, P. C. P. 3417–3528. doi: 10.1016/S1573-4463(99)30042-0.
  41. Welfare reform in European countries: a microsimulation analysis / H. Immervoll, H. J. Kleven, C. Th. Kreiner [et al.] // The Economic Journal. 2007. Vol. 117, № 516. Р. 1–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02000.x.
  42. Burchardt T. The Dynamics of Being Disabled // Journal of Social Policy. 2000. Vol. 29, № 04. Р. 645–668. doi: 10.1017/S0047279400006097.
  43. Labour market policies (LMP) in the European Union in 2019. A statistical analysis. Luxembourg : Publications Office of the European Union, 2023. 41 р. ISBN 978-92-7699673-6. doi: 10.2767/472792.
  44. Carcillo S., Grubb D. From Inactivity to Work: The Role of Active Labour Market Policies // OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working P. 36. Paris : OECD, 2006. 72 p. doi: 10.1787/687686456188.
  45. Haverman R., Wolfe B. The economics of disability and disability policy // Handbook of Health Economics / Eds. A. J. Culyer, J. P. Newhouse. Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2000. Vol. 1. Р. 995–1051. doi: 10.1016/S1574-0064(00)80031-1.
  46. Кулагина Е. В. Активная политика занятости в отношении лиц с инвалидностью // Социологическая наука и социальная практика. 2023. Т. 11, № 4. С. 78–111. doi: 10.19181/snsp.2023.11.4.4. EDN HRCKWN. [Kulagina E. V. Active market labour policies towards people with disabilities. Sociological science and social practice=Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. 2023;11(4):78–111. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.19181/snsp.2023.11.4.4.
  47. Taylor-Gooby P., Gumy J. M., Otto A. Can “New Welfare” address poverty through more and better jobs? // Journal of Social Policy. 2014. Vol. 44. № 1. Р. 83–104. doi: 10.1017/S0047279414000403.
  48. To what extent have relaxed eligibility requirements and increased generosity of disability benefits acted as disincentives for employment? A systematic review of evidence from countries with well-developed welfare systems / B. Barr, S. Clayton, M. Whitehead [et al.] // Epidemiology & Community Health. 2010. Vol. 64, № 12. Р. 1106–1114. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.111401.
  49. Hancock R, Berthoud R. Disability benefits and paying for care. ISER Working Paper Series from Institute for Social and Economic Research 2008. № 40. URL: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/working-papers/iser/2008-40.pdf (дата обращения: 17.10.2024).
  50. Pignatti C., Van Belle E. Better together: Active and passive labour market policies in developed and developing economies. International Labour Oganisation. Working Paper № 37. December 2018. URL: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---inst/documents/publication/wcms_660003.pdf (дата обращения: 29.08.2023).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).