Competing with generative artificial intelligence and gadgets: possibilities of modern educational practice in university
- Authors: Polyanina O.I.1, Shevkova E.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Perm State National Research University
- Issue: No 6 (2025)
- Pages: 102 - 112
- Section: PSYCHOLOGY
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2307-6127/article/view/359819
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.23951/2307-6127-2025-6-102-112
- ID: 359819
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article outlines current trends characterizing the modern educational practice of higher education. Two groups of challenges faced by education entities are presented. The first group is associated with the “hyperconnectivity” of education entities to the Internet. The second group of challenges is associated with the effects of using generative artificial intelligence in training. A number of phenomenaconsequences of the interaction of education entities with the digital environment are listed. Using the example of the phenomenon of multitasking, optimistic and pessimistic research expectations and forecasts concerning the outcomes of the detected transformation of the cognitive sphere of students are described. The currently unfolding technological transformation stimulates changes in the cognitive sphere and metacognitive functions of subjects. This situation in the higher education system requires psychological and pedagogical reflection. The novelty of the study lies in the fact that, in relation to the psychological consequences of the digital revolution in university education, a realistic answer is proposed that recognizes the inevitability of the changes taking place and at the same time assumes support for students’ subjectivity – self-regulation of their activities, awareness, organization of access to resources. The following are proposed as a methodological framework for designing learning relevant to the goals of developing subjectivity characteristics: a self-regulatory approach to learning, the concept of mental experience, and conscious learning. Within each approach, the targets of pedagogical interventions are listed, such as the processes of the self-regulation cycle of learning, components of mental experience, and recognition of the learning context. Possible tools for pedagogical interventions are also provided.
About the authors
Ol'ga Ivanovna Polyanina
Perm State National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: helgapol72@gmail.com
Perm, Russian Federation
Elena Viktorovna Shevkova
Perm State National Research University
Email: eshevkova@gmail.com
Perm, Russian Federation
References
- Radaev V.V. Krizis v sovremennom prepodavanii: chto imenno poshlo ne tak? [The crisis in modern teaching: what exactly went wrong?]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya – Sociological Studies, 2022, no. 6, pp. 114–124 (in Russian).
- Radaev V.V. Prepodavaniye v krizise [Teaching in Crisis]. Moscow, VShJe Publ., 2-e izd-e, 2023. 200 p. (in Russian).
- Tanova A.G., Evseeva L.I., Pozdeeva E.G., Trostinskaya I.R. Sub’’ektivnye aspekty monitoringa udovletvorennosti studentov kachestvom obrazovaniya (po materialam Tsentra sotsiologicheskikh issledovaniy SPbPU) [Subjective aspects of monitoring students’ satisfaction with the quality of education (based on materials from the Center for Sociological Research of SPbPU)]. Nauchno-tehnicheskiye vedomosti SPbGPU. Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki, 2018, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 90–101 (in Russian).
- Opolev P.V. Liminal’nost’ sovremennogo obrazovaniya [Liminality of modern education]. Obrazovaniye. Transport. Innovatsii. Stroitel’stvo. Sbornik materialov II Natsional’noy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Education. Transport. Innovations. Construction. Collection of materials of the II National scientific and practical conference]. Omsk, Siberian State Automobile and Highway University Publ., 2019. Pp. 708–711 (in Russian).
- Soldatova G.U., Rasskazova E.I. Itogi tsifrovoiy transformatsii: ot onlaiyn-real’nosti k smeshannoiy real’nosti [Results of digital transformation: from online reality to mixed reality]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya – Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2020, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 87–97 (in Russian). doi: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160409
- Soldatova G.U., Voyskunskiy A.E. Sotsial’no-kognitivnaya kontseptsiya tsifrovoy sotsializatsii: novaya ekosistema i sotsial’naya evolyutsiya psikhiki [Social-cognitive concept of digital socialization: new ecosystem and social evolution of the psyche]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki – Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2021, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 431–450 (in Russian). doi: 10.17323/1813-8918-2021-3-431-450
- Miklyayeva A.V., Bezgodova S.A. «Klipovoye myshleniye» v strukture stilevykh kharakteristik poznavatel’noiy deyatel’nosti studentov [“Clip Thinking” in the Structure of Stylistic Characteristics of Students’ Cognitive Activity]. Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik – Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2017, no. 5, pp. 223–227 (in Russian).
- Soldatova G.U., Rasskazova E.I. Mnogozadachnost’ kak odnovremennoye vypolneniye i kak pereklyucheniye mezhdu zadaniyami: podkhody k diagnostike mediamnogozadachnosti u deteiy i podrostkov [Multitasking as simultaneous execution and as switching between tasks: approaches to diagnostics of media multitasking in children and adolescents]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya – Experimental psychology, 2020, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 88–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.17759/ exppsy.2020130406 (in Russian).
- Soldatova G.U., Vishneva A.E., Koshevaya A.G. Osobennosti neyrokognitivnoy sfery shkol’nikov s raznym urovnem mediamnogozadachnosti [Features of the neurocognitive sphere of schoolchildren with different levels of media multitasking]. Voprosy psikhologii, 2022, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 54–68 (in Russian).
- Sheiynov V.P. Psikhologiya cheloveka v tsifrovoiy perspektive: retsenziya na uchebnoye posobiye «Tsifrovaya transformatsiya psikhologii cheloveka» (avtory S.A. Bezgodova, A.V. Miklyaeva) [Human Psychology in a Digital Perspective: Review of the Textbook “Digital Transformation of Human Psychology” (Authors S.A. Bezgodova, A.V. Miklyaeva)]. Psikhologiya cheloveka v obrazovanii – Psychology in education, 2024, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 384-391. https://www.doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2024-6-3-384-391 EDN PJHZEY (in Russian).
- Shlyapnikov V.N. Osobennosti volevoy regulyatsii molodykh lyudey – pol’zovateley sotsial’nykh setey [Features of volitional regulation of young people – users of social networks]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki – Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2021, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 858–870 (in Russian).
- Dean S. How We Learn. Why Brain Learns Better Than Any Machine… For Now. N.Y., Random House publ., 2021, 352 p. (Rus. ed.: Dean S. Kak my uchimsya? Pochemu mozg uchitsya luchshe, chem lyubaya mashina… poka. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2021. 352 p.).
- Sweller J. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 1994, vol. 4, issue 4, pp. 295–312.
- Voyskunskiy A.E., Khokhlova E.M., Mitina O.V., Dorokhova E.A. Mnogozadachnost’ v virtual’noy srede: empiricheskoye issledovaniye [Multitasking in a Virtual Environment: An Empirical Study]. Informatsionnoye obshchestvo: obrazovaniye, nauka, kul’tura i tekhnologii budushchego – Information Society: Education, Science, Culture and Technology of Future, 2020, no. 4, pp. 129–142 (in Russian).
- Kahneman D. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, PRENTICE-HALL, INC. Publ., 1973. P. 246. (Rus. ed.: Caneman D. Vnimaniye i usiliye. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2006, 288 p.).
- Ananin D.P., Komarov R.V., Remorenko I.M. «Kogda chestno – khorosho, dlya imitatsii – plokho»: strategii ispol’zovaniya generativnogo iskusstvennogo intellekta v rossiiyskom vuze [“When it’s honest – good, for imitation – bad”: strategies for using generative artifice al intelligence in a Russian university]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher education in Russia, 2025, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 31–50. doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-2-31-50 (in Russian).
- Lukichev P.M., Chekmarev O.P. Riski primeneniya iskusstvennogo intellekta v sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya [Risks of using artificial intelligence in the higher education system]. Voprosy innovatsionnoy ekonomiki – Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 2024, vol.14, no. 2, pp. 463–482 (in Russian).
- Ushakov D.I., Valueva E.A. Vyzovy iskusstvennogo intellekta dlya psikhologii [Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Psychology]. Chelovek i sistemy iskusstvennogo intellekta [Man and artificial intelligence systems]. Ed. by V.A. Lektorsky. Saint Petersburg, Yuridicheskiy tsentr Publ., 2022. Pp. 107–128 (in Russian).
- Semenov A.L., Ziskin K.E. Rasshirennaya lichnost’ kak osnovnoy sub’’ekt i predmet filosofskogo analiza. Sledstviya dlya obrazovaniya [Extended personality as the main subject and object of philosophical analysis. Implications for education]. Chelovek i sistemy iskusstvennogo intellekta [Man and artificial intelligence systems]. Ed. by V.A. Lektorsky. Saint Petersburg, Yuridicheskiy tsentr Publ., 2022. Pp. 172–201 (in Russian).
- Fomina T.G. Kontseptual’nye podkhody k analizu samoreguliruemogo obucheniya v zarubezhnoiy psikhologii obrazovaniya [Conceptual approaches to the analysis of self-regulated learning in foreign educational psychology]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya – Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2022, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 27–37 (in Russian).
- Vilkova K.A. Izmereniye samoreguliruemogo obucheniya: obzor instrumentov. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya [Measuring Self-Regulated Learning: A Review of Instruments]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya – Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2020, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 123–132 (in Russian). doi: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2020090211
- Sun Z., Xie K., Anderman L. H. The role of self-regulated learning in students’ success in flipped undergraduate math courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 2018, no. 36, pp. 41–53.
- Zimmerman B.J. Self-regulated Learning: Theories, Measures, and Out comes. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edition, 2015. Vol. 21. Pp. 541–546.
- Wong J., Baars M., Davis D., Van Der Zee T., Houben G., Paas F. Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in Online Learning Environments and MOOCs: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2019, no. 35 (4–5), pp. 356–373.
- Kur’yan M.L., Voronina E.A. Primeneniye tekhnologii pedagogicheskoy podderzhki (skaffolding) pri obuchenii studentov efektivnoy obratnoy svyazi [Application of pedagogical support technology (scaffolding) in teaching students effective feedback]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 2020, no. 461, pp. 183–191. doi: 10.17223/15617793/461/22 (in Russian).
- Kholodnaya M.A., Gel’fman Ye.G. Razvivayushchiye uchebnye teksty kak sredstvo intellektual’nogo vospitaniya uchashchikhsya [Developing educational texts as a means of intellectual education of students]. Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN Publ., 2016. 200 p. (in Russian).
- Kholodnaya M.A., Gel’fman Ye.G. Intellektual’noye vospitaniye uchashchikhsya na osnove psikhodidakticheskogo podkhoda: rol’ uchebnogo teksta [Intellectual education of students based on the psychodidactic approach: the role of the educational text]. Psikhodidaktika sovremennogo uchebnika: preemstvennost’ traditsiy i vektory razvitiya: sbornik nauchnykh statey [Psychodidactics of a modern textbook: continuity of traditions and vectors of development: collection of scientific articles]. Ed. N.A. Borisenko. Moscow, Mnemozina Publ., 2019. Pp. 50–55 (in Russian).
- Bordunos A.K., Miletich M.P., Volkova N.V. Osoznannoye obucheniye: printsipy i vozmozhnosti primeneniya v vysshem obrazovanii [Mindful Learning: Principles and Applications in Higher Education]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye – Psychological Science and Education, 2024, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 16–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2024290402 (in Russian).
Supplementary files


