Digital sovereignty: key concepts and theories in Russian and global contexts

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive analysis of the concept of digital sovereignty, summarizing current scholarly approaches, identifying key theories, and examining how these ideas manifest in global and Russian contexts. The study reveals a broad spectrum of global interpretations of this phenomenon – ranging from the libertarian ideal of a free, borderless cyberspace to state-centric models of strict control over national internet segments. It identifies four primary models of national digital policy: rights-based, market-oriented, centralized, and state-oriented. The analysis highlights that digital sovereignty is an evolving and contested construct spanning multiple levels, from global norms and state regulation to corporate and individual control of data. Special attention is paid to the Russian approach, which frames digital sovereignty as a prerequisite for national security and technological independence. The paper examines practical measures for realizing this sovereignty in Russia, such as the “sovereign internet” law, technological import substitution, and strengthening information security. The Russian perspective is contextualized within international relations theory through the notion of “digital sovereignty in a multipolar world”, which underscores the need for global norms to safeguard states’ digital autonomy. By offering a comprehensive comparative perspective on the global and Russian dimensions of digital sovereignty, the study provides a deeper understanding of this phenomenon at the intersection of technology, politics, and public law.

About the authors

Sergey A. Spartak

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: sspartak@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-3494-6127
SPIN-code: 9147-1725

Cand. Sci. (Polit.), associate professor, Department of Philosophy of Language and Communication, Faculty of Philosophy

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Avdiyskiy V.I., Ivanov A.V., Konnova I.G. Institutionalization of the state’s digital sovereignty in the field of information security. Informatization in the Digital Economy. 2024. Vol. 5. No. 3. Pp. 385–400. (In Rus.)
  2. Antonov D.E. Digital sovereignty of the modern state: From control to communication. Polylogos. 2022. Vol. 6. No. 2 (20). (In Rus.)
  3. Popova E.V., Ustyuzhantseva O.V., Gao H. Constructing digital sovereignty in Russian and Chinese media: Big data analysis. Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: International Relations. 2025. Vol. 25. No. 2. Pp. 251–266. (In Rus.)
  4. Braun M., Hummel P. Is digital sovereignty normatively desirable? Information, Communication & Society. 2024. Vol. 28. No. 10. Pp. 1721–1734. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2024.2332624.
  5. Fratini S., Hine E., Novelli C. et al. Digital sovereignty: A descriptive analysis and a critical evaluation of existing models. Digital Society. 2024. Vol. 3. Art. 59.
  6. Pohle J., Thiel T. Digital sovereignty. Internet Policy Review. 2020. Vol. 9. No. 4.
  7. Rebro O., Gladysheva A., Suchkov M., Sushentsov A. The notion of “Digital Sovereignty” in modern world politics. International Trends. 2021. Vol. 19. No. 4. Pp. 47–67.
  8. Santaniello M. Attributes of digital sovereignty: A conceptual framework. Geopolitics. 2025. Pp. 1–22.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Yur-VAK

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).