Experimental Determination of the Gas Transport Characteristics of Polysuflone and Polyphenyleneoxide Hollow-Fiber Membranes in Relation to Noble Gases

A. A. Atlaskin; Атласкин А. А.; S. S. Kryuchkov; Крючков С. С.; A. N. Stepakova; Степакова А. Н.; I. S. Moiseenko; Моисеенко И. С.; N. S. Tsivkovsky; Цивковский Н. С.; K. A. Smorodin; Смородин К. А.; A. N. Petukhov; Петухов А. Н.; M. E. Atlaskina; Атласкина М. Е.; I. V. Vorotyntsev; Воротынцев И. В.

doi:10.31857/S2218117223050012

Experimental Determination of the Gas Transport Characteristics of Polysuflone and Polyphenyleneoxide Hollow-Fiber Membranes in Relation to Noble Gases

作者: Atlaskin A.¹, Kryuchkov S.¹, Stepakova A.¹, Moiseenko I.¹, Tsivkovsky N.¹, Smorodin K.¹, Petukhov A.¹^,2, Atlaskina M.¹, Vorotyntsev I.¹
隶属关系:
1. Mendeleev Russian University of Chemical Technology
2. Department of Chemistry, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
期: 卷 13, 编号 5 (2023)
页面: 402-411
栏目: Articles
URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2218-1172/article/view/140996
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2218117223050012
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WDAEEK
ID: 140996

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取

##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问

订阅存取

详细
作者简介
参考
补充文件
统计

详细

This paper presents an an experimental study of commercially available hollow fiber membranes made of two polymers, polysulfone and polyphenylene oxide. The main objective is to determine the gas transport characteristics of these membranes with respect to air components and noble gases. Therefore, the permeabilities of the membranes for nitrogen, oxygen, helium, argon, xenon and krypton were determined as part of this study. Particular attention is paid to the xenon-containing air mixture, since the problem of capturing medical xenon seems to be an urgent chemical and technological problem due to the high cost of the process of obtaining this gas. In the course of the study, the values of the permeability of two membranes for pure gases were determined and the values of ideal selectivity were calculated. Thus, the membrane permeability values for argon, krypton, and xenon were 20.8, 8.4, and 6.8 GPU for the polysulfone membrane and 19.5, 6.2, and 4.8 GPU for the polyphenylene oxide membrane. It was found that the xenon permeability of these membranes decreases in the case of separation of a gas mixture consisting of oxygen nitrogen and xenon and is 5.9 and 4.1 GPU for polysulfone and polyphenylene oxide, respectively. The dependence of the performance of membrane modules based on polysulfone and polyphenylene oxide on the total area of the membrane has also been established.

关键词

membrane gas separation, polysulfone, polyphenylene oxide, noble gases, xenon, krypton, argon, helium

参考

Sreenu B., Sarkar R., Kumar S.S.S., Chatterjee S., Rao G.A. // Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2020. V. 797. P. 140254.
Yang J., Stegmaier U., Tang C., Steinbrück M., Große M., Wang S., Seifert H.J. // J. Nuclear Materials. 2021. V. 547. P. 152806.
Vorotyntsev A.V., Petukhov A.N., Trubyanov M.M., Atlaskin A.A., Makarov D.A., Sergeeva M.S., Vorotyntsev I.V., Vorotyntsev V.M. // Reviews in Chemical Engineering. 2021. V. 37. I. 1. P. 125–161.
Sui Y., Hess-Dunning A., Wei P., Pentzer E., Sankaran R.M., Zorman C.A. // Advanced Materials Technologies. 2019. V. 4. I. 12. P. 1900834.
Torbin A.P., Chernyshov A.K., Svistun M.I., Mikheyev P.A. // J. Physics: Conference Series. 2021. V. 2067. I. 1. P. 012 014.
Trubyanov M.M., Mochalov G.M., Suvorov S.S., Puzanov E.S., Petukhov A.N., Vorotyntsev I.V., Vorotyntsev V.M. // J. Chromatography A. 2018. V. 1560. P. 71–77.
Wang Y.Z., Li T.T., Cao H.L., Yang W.C. // Medical Gas Research. 2019. V. 9. I. 2. P. 80–87.
Aarhaug T.A., Kjos O., Isaksen M., Polden J.O. // 2023. P. 743–748.
Kim M.S., Lee T., Son Y., Park J., Kim M., Eun H., Park J.W., Kim Y. // Processes 2022. V. 10. P. 2401.
Tabares F.L., Junkar I. // Molecules. 2021. V. 26. P. 1903. 2021.
Ustyugova T.G., Kupriyanov M.Y. // Chemical and Petroleum Engineering. 2020. V. 56. I. 5–6. P. 371–377.
Sanders D.F., Smith Z.P., Guo R., Robeson L.M., McGrath J.E., Paul D.R., Freeman B.D. // Polymer. 2013. V. 54. I. 18. P. 4729–4761.
Castro-Muñoz R., Agrawal K.V., Coronas J. // RSC Advances. 2020. V. 10. I. 21. P. 12653–12670.
Bondarenko V.L., Losyakov I.A., D’yachenko O.V., D’yachenko T.V. // Chemical and Petroleum Engineering. 2019. V. 54. I. 9–10. P. 728–734.
Bondarenko V.L., Losyakov I.A., D’yachenko O.V., D’yachenko T.V. // Chemical and Petroleum Engineering. 2019. V. 54. I. 9–10. P. 735–745.
Miandoab E.S., Mousavi S.H., Kentish S.E., Scholes C.A. // Separation and Purification Technology. 2021. V. 262. P. 118 349.
Li H., Liu H., Li Y., Nan J., Shi C., Li S. // Energies. 2021. V. 14. P. 2266. 2021. V. 14. I. 8. P. 2266.
Park J., Kim S.J., Lee I., Shin J.W., Park Y.I., Kim K., Park Y.K. // Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2021. V. 172. P. 204–214.
Xu Y., Tang Y., He C., Shu Y., Chen Q.L., Zhang B.J. // Chemical Engineering and Processing – Process Intensification. 2022. V. 177. P. 108982.
Yang L., Qian S., Wang X., Cui X., Chen B., Xing H. // Chemical Society Reviews. 2020. V. 49. I. 15. P. 5359–5406.
Atlaskin A.A., Trubyanov M.M., Yanbikov N.R., Bukovsky M.V., Drozdov P.N., Vorotyntsev V.M., Vorotyntsev I.V. // Petroleum Chemistry. 2018. V. 58. I. 6. P. 508–517.
Petukhov A.N., Atlaskin A.A., Kryuchkov S.S., Smorodin K.A., Zarubin D.M., Petukhova A.N., Atlaskina M.E., Nyuchev A.V., Vorotyntsev A.V., Trubyanov M.M., Vorotyntsev I. V., Vorotynstev V.M. // Chemical Engineering J. 2021. V. 421. P. 127726.
Nunes S.P., Culfaz-Emecen P.Z., Ramon G.Z., Visser T., Koops G.H., Jin W., Ulbricht M. // J. Membrane Science. 2020. V. 598. P. 117761.
Ahmad M.Z., Peters T.A., Konnertz N.M., Visser T., Téllez C., Coronas J., Fila V., de Vos W.M., Benes N.E. // Separation and Purification Technology. 2020. V. 230. P. 115 858.
Vorotyntsev I. V., Atlaskin A.A., Trubyanov M.M., Petukhov A.N., Gumerova O.R., Akhmetshina A.I., Vorotyntsev V.M. // DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT. 2017. V. 75. P. 305–313.
Suwaileh W., Pathak N., Shon H., Hilal N. // Desalination. 2020. V. 485. P. 114455.
Alent’ev A.Y., Volkov A. V., Vorotyntsev I. V., Maksimov A.L., Yaroslavtsev A.B. // Membranes and Membrane Technologies. 2021. V. 3. I. 5. P. 255–273.
Sergeeva M.S., Mokhnachev N.A., Shablykin D.N., Vorotyntsev A.V., Zarubin D.M., Atlaskin A.A., Trubyanov M.M., Vorotyntsev I.V., Vorotyntsev V.M., Petukhov A.N. // J. Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2021. V. 86. P. 103 740.
Смородин К.А., Атласкин А.А., Зарубин Д.М., Петухов А.Н., Крючков С.С., Петухова А.Н., Атласкина М.Е., Степакова А.Н., Марков А.Н., Воротынцев И.В. // Мембраны и мембранные технологии. 2022. Т. 12. № 4. С. 235–244.
Alentiev A.Y., Levin I.S., Buzin M.I., Belov N.A., Nikiforov R.Y., Chirkov S.V., Blagodatskikh I.V., Keche-kyan A.S., Kechekyan P.A., Bekeshev V.G., Ryzhikh V.E., Yampolskii Y.P. // Polymer. 2021. V. 226.
Brožová L., Žitka J., Tomšík E. // Polymer Testing. 2021. V. 94.
Dibrov G., Ivanov M., Semyashkin M., Sudin V., Fateev N., Kagramanov G. // Fibers. 2019. V. 7. I. 5. P. 43.
Aitken C.L., Koros W.J., Paul D.R. // Macromolecules. 1992. V. 25. I. 13. P. 3424–3434.
Julian H., Wenten I.G. // IOSR J. Engineering. 2012. V. 2. I. 3. P. 484–495.
Low Z.-X., Budd P.M., McKeown N.B., Patterson D.A. // Chemical Reviews. 2018. V. 118. I. 12. P. 5871–5911.
Pinnau I. // J. Membrane Science. 2004. V. 241. I. 2. P. 363–369.
Alexander Stern S. // J. Membrane Science. 1994. V. 94. I. 1. P. 1–65.
Yampolskii Y., Pinnau I., Freeman B.D. // Materials Science of Membranes for Gas and Vapor Separation. 2006. P. 1–445.