Improving the accuracy of segmentation masks using a generative-adversarial network model
- Authors: Vinokurov I.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 16, No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 111-152
- Section: artificial intelligence, intelligence systems, neural networks
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2079-3316/article/view/300939
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.25209/2079-3316-2025-16-2-111-152
- ID: 300939
Cite item
Abstract
Masks obtained using the deep learning model Mask R-CNN may in some cases contain fragmented contours, uneven boundaries, false fusions of adjacent objects, and areas with missed segmentation. The more detection objects in the image and the smaller their size, the more often various types of defects in their masks are encountered. Examples of such images include aerial photographs of cottage and garden associations and cooperatives characterized by high building density. To correct these defects, it is proposed to use a generative adversarial network model that performs post-processing of the predicted Mask R-CNN masks.A qualitative assessment of the model formed in the work demonstrated that it is capable of restoring the integrity of contours at an acceptable level, filling in missing areas, and separating erroneously merged objects. Quantitative analysis using the IoU, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics showed a statistically significant improvement in the segmentation quality compared to the original Mask R-CNN masks. The obtained results confirmed that the proposed approach allows to increase the accuracy of the formation of object masks to a level that satisfies the requirements of their practical application in automated aerial photograph analysis systems.
About the authors
Igor Victorovich Vinokurov
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Email: igvvinokurov@fa.ru
Candidate of Technical Sciences (PhD), Associate Professor at the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation. Research interests: information systems, information technologies, data processing technologies
References
- Vinokurov I. V. „Using the Mask R-CNN model for segmentation of real estate objects in aerial photographs“, Program Systems: Theory and Applications, 16:1(64) (2025), pp. 3–44.
- G. Cohen, R. Giryes. Generative adversarial networks, 2024, 28 pp.
- P. Isola, J.-Y. Zhu, T. Zhou, A. A. Efros. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks, 2016, 17 pp.
- T.-C. Wang, M.-Y. Liu, J.-Y. Zhu, A. Tao, J. Kautz, B. Catanzaro. High-resolution image synthesis and semantic manipulation with conditional GANs, 2017, 14 pp.
- C.-H. Lee, Z. Liu, L. Wu, P. Luo. MaskGAN: Towards diverse and interactive facial image manipulation, 2019, 20 pp.
- Y. Xue, T. Xu, H. Zhang, L. Rodney Long, X. Huang. SegAN: Adversarial network with multi-scale $L_1$ loss for medical image segmentation, 2017, 9 pp.
- X. Chen, C. Xu, X. Yang, D. Tao. Attention-GAN for object transfiguration in wild images, 2018, 18 pp.
- J.-Y. Zhu, T. Park, P. Isola, A. A. Efros. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks, 2017, 18 pp.
- J. Gong, J. Xu, X. Tan, J. Zhou, Y. Qu, Y. Xie, L. Ma. Boundary-aware geometric encoding for semantic segmentation of point clouds, 2021, 9 pp.
- L. Xu, M. Gabbouj. Revisiting generative adversarial networks for binary semantic segmentation on imbalanced datasets, 2024, 14 pp.
- R. Abdelfattah, X. Wang, S. Wang. JPLGAN: Generative adversarial networks for power-line segmentation in aerial images, 2022, 11 pp.
- B. Benjdira, Y. Bazi, A. Koubaa, K. Ouni. „Unsupervised domain adaptation using generative adversarial networks for semantic segmentation of aerial images“, Remote Sens., 11:11 (2019), 1369, 23 pp.
- A. Kulkarni, T. Mohandoss, D. Northrup, E. Mwebaze, H. Alemohammad. Semantic segmentation of medium-resolution satellite imagery using conditional generative adversarial networks, 2020, 7 pp.
- Q. H. Le, K. Youcef-Toumi, D. Tsetserukou, A. Jahanian. GAN Mask R-CNN: Instance semantic segmentation benefits from generative adversarial networks, 2020, 13 pp.
- A. Radford, L. Metz, S. Chintala. Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks, 2016, 16 pp.
- O. Ronneberger, Ph. Fischer, Th. Brox. U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, 2015, 8 pp.
- T. Karras, S. Laine, T. Aila. A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks, 2018, 12 pp.
- T. Karras, T. Aila, S. Laine, J. Lehtinen. Progressive growing of GANs for improved quality, stability, and variation, 2017, 26 pp.
- M. Mirza, S. Osindero. Conditional generative adversarial nets, 2014, 7 pp.
- T. Miyato, T. Kataoka, M. Koyama, Y. Yoshida. Spectral normalization for generative adversarial networks, 2018, 26 pp.
- I. Gulrajani, F. Ahmed, M. Arjovsky, V. Dumoulin, A. C. Courville. Improved training of Wasserstein GANs, 2017, 20 pp.
- H. Zhang, I. Goodfellow, D. Metaxas, A. Odena. Self-attention generative adversarial networks, 2019, 10 pp.
- H. Chen. „An improved Douglas-Peucker algorithm applied in coastline generalization“, Fourth International Conference on Geology, Mapping, and Remote Sensing (ICGMRS 2023) (14–16 April 2023, Wuhan, China), Proc. SPIE, vol. 12978, 2024.
Supplementary files


