Features of the federative integration of Central Asia, 1918–1925
- Authors: Akzhigitov R.R.1
-
Affiliations:
- Penza State University
- Issue: No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 92-106
- Section: LAW
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2072-3016/article/view/327927
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.21685/2072-3016-2025-2-8
- ID: 327927
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. The issues of constructing and maintaining a federal state remain relevant over time, and in conditions of international turbulence, they only become more significant. This is especially true when it comes to post-imperial, multi-ethnic federalism, the level of governance of which must be significantly higher than that of ordinary bourgeois federalism. The author aims to demonstrate the peculiarities of federal construction on distant borders in the context of the intersection of competing national ambitions, which the young Soviet government attempted to pacify by implementing an optimal national-territorial demarcation. Materials and methods. The article was prepared on the basis of monographs and articles on the development of Central Asia from the second half of the 19th century to the mid-1920s inclusive. Statistical material and comparative political science method were used. Results. The Central Asian region was the latest to be included into the Russian Empire. Its territorial and administrative basis was the Turkestan region and two protectorates – the Bukhara Emirate and the Khiva Khanate. The local Russian administration did not force the resettlement of peasants from Central Russia; it occurred naturally due to famine and land shortages in the inhabited territories of the empire. The fall of the autocracy and the Provisional Government contributed to nationalist unrest, which was partially neutralized with the liquidation of the Kokand autonomy in February 1918, but the Soviet government achieved a key victory only with the lifting of the blockade in January 1919. At the same time, the Basmachi movement was a serious destabilizing factor. In 1920, the Muslim authoritarian monarchies in Khiva and Bukhara were successfully over-thrown, transforming them into people's republics and then socialist republics within the RSFSR. The formation of the Basmachi in 1922 prompted a shift to streamlining the national-territorial structure in 1924–1925 along the lines outlined by V.I. Lenin as early as July 1920. At the same time, they had to overcome the local national communists. One of the most active among them was T. Ryskulov, who dreamed of creating a purely Turkic communist party and army in Turkestan. Conclusions. The national-territorial demarcation carried out in 1924–1925 primarily envisaged the abolition of the Turkestan ASSR, Bukha-ra and Khiva as pseudo-state entities and the organization of two new union republics – the Turkmen SSR and the Uzbek SSR – with the purpose of overcoming the danger of pan-Turkism and pan-Sylvanism. The Bolsheviks were in no hurry to raise the status of other republics to the level of union republics (the Tajik ASSR, the Kara-Kirghiz Autonomous Region), which was completely fair given the existing socio-economic and cultural back-wardness and nationalistic prejudices.
About the authors
Rinat R. Akzhigitov
Penza State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: makwwwin@yandex.ru
Postgraduate student
(40 Krasnaya street, Penza, Russia)References
- The administrative system of Turkestan. Wikipedia. (In Russ.). Available at: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sistema_administrativnogo_upravleniya_Turkestanom (ac-cessed 14.02.2025).
- Steppe Governorate-General. Wikipedia. (In Russ.). Available at: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepnoe_general-gubernatorstvo (accessed 14.02.2025).
- Abashin S. Natsionalizmy v Sredney Azii v poiskakh identichnosti: monografiya = Na-tionalism in Central Asia in Search of Identity: A Monograph. Saint Petersburg: Al-eteya, 2007:302. (In Russ.)
- Turkestan Autonomy. Wikipedia. (In Russ.). Available at: https://ru.wikipedia. org/wiki/Turkestanskaya_Avtonomnaya_Sotsialisticheskaya_Sovetskaya_Respublika (accessed 17.02.2025).
- Buttino M. Revolyutsiya naoborot. Srednyaya Aziya mezhdu padeniem tsarskoy imperii i obrazovaniem SSSR = Revolution in reverse: Central Asia between the fall of the Tsar-ist Empire and the formation of the USSR. Moscow: Zven'ya, 2007:446. (In Russ.)
- Karr E. Istoriya Sovetskoy Rossii: v 14 t. T. 1–2. Bol'shevistskaya revolyutsiya. 1917–1923 = History of Soviet Russia: in 14 volumes. Volume 1–2. Bolshevik Revolution. 1917–1923. Moscow: Progress, 1990:763. (In Russ.)
- Bochkareva I.B. The question of power in Turkestan before and after the October Revolution. Sotsial'nye, kul'turnye issledovaniya i bezopasnost' = Social, cultural studies and security. 2019;(3):193–202. (In Russ.)
- Razmakhov K.E. Creation of Soviet autonomy in Turkestan in 1917–1918. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Min-istry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2013;(9):42–46. (In Russ.)
- Ryskulov Turar Ryskulovich. Wikipedia. (In Russ.). Available at: https://ru. wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryskulov,_Turar_Ryskulovich (accessed 16.02.2025).
- Kolesovʼs campaign. Wikipedia. (In Russ.). Available at: https://ru.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Kolesovskiy_pokhod (accessed 15.02.1015).
- Barmin V.A. On some reasons for the emergence of the Basmachi movement in Turke-stan in 1918–1923. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya = Bulle-tin of Tomsk State University. History. 2018;(53):88–92. (In Russ.)
- Blyakher L.E., Yarushin I.F. Who were the Basmachi? Soviet Mythmaking and Stigma-tization of the Civil War in Central Asia. Politiya = Police. 2026;(2):109–123. (In Russ.)
- Askhabad Uprising (1918). Wikipedia. (In Russ.). Available at: https://ru.wikipedia. org/wiki/Askhabadskoe_vosstanie_(1918) (accessed 17.02.2025).
- British intervention in Central Asia. Wikipedia. (In Russ.). Available at: https://ru. wikipedia.org/wiki/Britanskaya_interventsiya_v_Sredney_Azii (accessed 15.02.2025).
- Bochkareva I.B. The Turkestan Commission of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee and the national question in the TurkASSR (1920). Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Proceedings of Altay State University. 2016;(3):43–47. (In Russ.)1. The administrative system of Turkestan. Wikipedia. (In Russ.).
- Lenin V.I. Comments on the draft resolution of the Central Committee on the tasks of the RCP(V) in Turkestan. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 55 t. T. 41. May – noyabr' 1920. 5-e izd. = Complete set of works: in 55 volumes. Volume 41. May – November 1920. The 5th edition. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury, 1981:433–436. (In Russ.)
- Kommunisticheskaya partiya Sovetskogo Soyuza v rezolyutsiyakh i resheniyakh s"ezdov, konferentsiy i plenumov TsK (1898–1988): v 15 t. T. 1: 1898–1917 = The Communist Party of the Soviet Union in resolutions and decisions of congresses, conferences and plenary sessions of the Central Committee (1898–1988): in 15 volumes. Volume 1: 1898–1917. 9th edition, revised and expanded. Moscow: Politizdat, 1983:638. (In Russ.)
- Anderson M.F. Iz istorii partiynogo stroitel'stva v Sredney Azii = From the history of party building in Central Asia. Dushanbe: Irfon, 1966:222. (In Russ.)
- Nazarov S.A. Iz istorii deyatel'nosti Sredazbyuro TsK RKP(b) (1922–1924 gg.) = From the history of the activities of the Central Asian Bureau of the Central Committee of the RCP(V) (1922–1924). Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 1965:118. (In Russ.)
- Alibek S.S. The Second Revolution in Central Asia: the annexation of the Syr Darya and Semirechye regions to the Kazakh ASSR. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Istoriya Rossii = Bulletin of RUDN. Series: Russian history. 2008;(1):106–108. (In Russ.)
- Safarov G.K. On the issue of annexing the Syr Darya and Semirechye regions to the Kirov Republic. Zhizn' natsional'nostey = Life of nationalities. 1922;May 19. (In Russ.)
- Bochkareva I.B. National-territorial demarcation in Central Asia in 1924: causes and impact on ethnopolitical processes in the region. Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoricheskie nauki i arkheologiya. = Proceedings of Altay State Universi-ty. Historical sciences and archeology. 2019;(2):22–26. (In Russ.)
- Abashin S. Natsionalizmy v Sredney Azii: v poiskakh identichnosti: monografiya = Na-tionalism in Central Asia: In Search of Identity: A Monograph. Saint Petersburg: Al-eteya, 2007:302. (In Russ.)
- Abashin S. Ethnographic knowledge and nation-building in Central Asia (the “Sart problem” in the 21st century): DSc dissertation. Moscow, 2008:355. (In Russ.)
- Kyrgyz Autonomous Region. Wikipedia. (In Russ.). Available at: https://ru. wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirgizskaya_avtonomnaya_oblast' (accessed 18.02.2025).
- Dashev A. National-territorial demarcation in Soviet Central Asia. Turan-nale. 2021;(1). (In Russ.). Available at: https://www.academia.edu/49681985/TURAN_ NAME_T%D0%A3%D0%A0%D0%90%D0%9D_%D0%9D%D0%90%D0%9C%D0%95_%D0%A2%D3%AE%D0%A0%D0%9E%D0%9D%D0%9D%D0%9E%D0%9C%D0%90_1_2021
- Adymbekov K. National-territorial delimitation of the Central Asian republics: prob-lems and specifics (1920–1924). Vestnik Issyk-Kul'skogo universiteta = Bulletin of Is-syk-Kul University. 2002;(7):107–112. (In Russ.)
- Shushkova M.E. National-territorial delimitation of Central Asia: the view of Tajik his-torians on the problem. Sovetskiy proekt. 1917–1930-e gg.: etapy i mekhanizmy reali-zatsii: sb. nauch. tr. = The Soviet project. 1917–1930ss: stages and implementation mechanisms: collected papers. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2018:515–521. (In Russ.)
- Masov R.M. Istoriya topornogo razdeleniya = The history of a clumsy division. Du-shanbe: Irfon, 1911:189. (In Russ.)
- Polyakov Yu.A. Sovetskaya strana posle okonchaniya grazhdanskoy voyny: territoriya i naselenie = The Soviet Union after the end of the civil war: territory and population. Moscow: Nauka, 1986:270. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
