Interrelation of Neuropsychological and Personality Factors with the Choice of Strategies of Coercion or Nonviolence among Students of the Socionomic Sphere

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Introduction. The urgency of the problem is caused by the importance of formation of ability to non-violent interaction in students of socionomic (helping) sphere as the most important professional competence that assumes study of factors and conditions of its formation and development. The aim of the research is to identify the relationship between neuropsychological and personal factors with the choice of students ‒ future medical, psychological, pedagogical psychologists in the process of interaction strategies of coercion or nonviolence.

Materials and Methods. The study involved students from a number of universities in the Russian Federation: Moscow, Cherepovets, Vologda region, Ivanovo, Ivanovo region. In total – 334 people. As a diagnostic tool, the authorʼs questionnaire was used to identify the positions of interaction among students, the Carver ‒ White questionnaire in the adaptation of G. G. Knyazev, the questionnaire for the diagnosis of five personality factors in the adaptation of L. F. Burlachuk and D. K. Korolev, the scale “Moral normativity” questionnaire “Adaptability” Maklakov – Chermyanin. Mathematical processing was carried out with the help of correlation analysis; Spearmanʼs rank correlation coefficient was also used.

Results. It was established that the choice of coercion strategy by students in the process of interaction is associated with a high level of behavioral activation, low levels of benevolence, conscientiousness and moral normativity. The choice of manipulation strategy, in addition to this, is correlated with high neuroticism. Nonviolence is positively associated with benevolence, conscientiousness, and moral normativity, and negatively to neuroticism. Noninterference correlates negatively with the Behavioral Inhibition System and positively with the Behavioral Inhibition System, as well as with neuroticism, introversion and closeness to experience and low conscientiousness.

Discussion and Conclusion. The obtained results make a certain contribution to understanding of the problem of the relationship between students’ choice in the process of interaction of strategies of coercion or nonviolence with neuropsychological and personal factors, which makes it possible to develop special programs aimed simultaneously at teaching methods of nonviolent interaction, and at the development of certain personal qualities, taking into account individual severity. systems of activation and inhibition of behavior.

About the authors

Vladimir G. Maralov

Cherepovets State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: vgmaralov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9627-2304
Scopus Author ID: 57128513900
ResearcherId: X-5925-2018

Professor of the Chair of Psychology, Dr.Sci. (Psychol.), Professor

Russian Federation, Cherepovets

Marina A. Kudaka

Cherepovets State University

Email: kydakam@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0352-390X
Scopus Author ID: 57204363267

Head of the Chair of Psychology, Cand.Sci. (Psychol.), Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Cherepovets

Olga V. Smirnova

Cherepovets State University

Email: novale@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3659-1626

Associate Professor of the Chair of Psychology, Cand.Sci. (Psychol.), Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Cherepovets

Viacheslav A. Sitarov

Moscow City University

Email: sitarov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8426-7487
Scopus Author ID: 6504289657

Professor of the Pedagogy Department, Dr.Sci. (Ped.), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Irina I. Koryagina

Ivanovo State Medical Academy of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Email: koryaginairina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7821-6819
Scopus Author ID: 57207467561
ResearcherId: G-9740-2019

Associate Professor of the Chair of Humanities, Cand.Sci. (Ped.), Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Ivanovo

Larisa V. Romanyuk

Moscow University for the Humanities

Email: lora1408@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2764-8205
Scopus Author ID: 57216297268

Professor of the Chair of Pedagogy and Psychology of Higher School, Dr.Sci. (Ped.), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Christie D.J., Tint B.S., Wagner R.V., Winter D.D. Peace Psychology for a Peaceful World. American Psychologist. 2008;63(6):540–552. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.6.540
  2. Maralov V.G., Sitarov V.A. Non-Violence Psychology: Problems of Researches and Prospects of Development. Russian Journal of the Humanities. 2019;19(2):195–215. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi. org/10.15507/2078-9823.046.019.201902.195-215
  3. Nielsen R., Marrone J.A. Humility: Our Current Understanding of the Construct and its Role in Organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2018;20(4):805–824. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12160
  4. Maralov V.G., Sitarov V.A. Characteristic of Interaction Strategies as Forms of Expressing the Values of Compulsion or Non-Coercion. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2017;(1):131–146. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17805/zpu.2017.1.9
  5. Orazbayeva K.O. Professional Competence of Teachers in the Age of Globalization. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 2016;11(9):2659–2672. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1114610.pdf (accessed 20.09.2021).
  6. Kukhtova N.V. Structural Components of the Prosocial Personality of Assistance-Oriented Professionals. Psychology in Education. 2021;3(3):273–287. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2021-3-3-273-287
  7. Wacker R., Dziobek I. Preventing Empathic Distress and Social Stressors at Work through Nonviolent Communication Training: A Field Study with Health Professionals. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2018;23(1):141–150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000058
  8. Vetluzhskaya M.V., Abramova A.A., Serdakova K.G., Bykova E.E., Khammatova R.S., Shurupova R.V. Characteristics of Emotional Intelligence and Empathic Abilities in Medical Students. Integration of Education. 2019;23(3):404–422. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.096.023.201903.404-422
  9. Ashraf R.I., Fatima I. Role of Personality and Spirituality in Nonviolent Behavior in Young Adults. Journal of Behavioural Sciences. 2014;24(1):57–70.
  10. Smits D.J.M., Boeck P.D. From BIS/BAS to the Big Five. European Journal of Personality. 2006;20(4):255–270. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.583
  11. Mitchell J.T., Kimbrel N.A., Hundt N.E. et al. An Analysis of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and the Five‐Factor Model. European Journal of Personality. 2007;21(7):869–887. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.644
  12. Morris A., Cushman F. A Common Framework for Theories of Norm Compliance. Social Philosophy and Policy. 2018;35(1):101–127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052518000134
  13. Pashchenko A.K. Structural-Dialectic Approach to Understanding the Normative Behavior of a Person. Philology and Culture. 2012;(3):299–304. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/strukturno-dialekticheskiy-podhod-k-ponimaniyu-problemy-normativnogo-povedeniya-lichnosti/viewer (accessed 01.12.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
  14. Bagnoli C. The Sources and Stances of Moral Normativity. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XXIII. 2021;(2):397–414. doi: https://doi.org/10.13137/1825-5167/32392
  15. Farrell A.D., Erwin E.H., Bettencourt A., Mays S., Vulin-Reynolds M., Sullivan T., Allison K.W., Kliewer W., Meyer A. Individual Factors Influencing Effective Nonviolent Behavior and Fighting in Peer Situations: A Qualitative Study with Urban African American Adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. 2008;37(2):397–411. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410801955821
  16. Farrell A.D., Bettencourt A.F. Adolescents’ Appraisal of Responses to Problem Situations and Their Relation to Aggression and Nonviolent Behavior. Psychology of Violence. 2020;10(3):312–323. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000261
  17. O’Connor K.E., Coleman J.N., Farrell A.D., Sullivan T.N. Patterns of Parental Messages Supporting Fighting and Nonviolence among Urban Middle School Students. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2020;30(4):913–927. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12570
  18. Makarenko O.V., Bogomaz S.A. [Personal Peculiarity of Students-Psychologists Inclined to Manipulation by the Other People]. Tomsk State University Journal. 2005;(286):105–109. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11992428 (accessed 02.01.2022). (In Russ.)
  19. Maralov V.G., Sitarov V.A., Romanyuk L.V. Interaction Positions among Medical Students and Students Trained as Educators and Psychologists. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research & Allied Sciences. 2019;8(2):35–47. Available at: https://clck.ru/iWdKS (accessed 01.12.2021).
  20. Maralov V.G., Sitarov V.A., Maralova T.P., Romanyuk L.V. Psychological Profiles of Students Prone to Coercion (Manipulation), Non-Violence and Non-Intervention. Perspectives of Science and Education. 2020;(1):282–301. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2020.1.20
  21. Goldberg L.R., Shmelev A.G. [Intercultural Study of the Names of Personality Traits: Big Five Factors in English and Russian]. Psychological Journal. 1993;14(4):32–39. (In Russ.)
  22. Corr P.J, McNaughton N. Neuroscience and Approach/Avoidance Personality Traits: A Two Stage (Valuation-Motivation) Approach. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2012;36(10):2339–2354. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.09.013
  23. Carlson S.R., Pritchard A.A., Dominelli R.M. Externalizing Behavior, the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale and Reward and Punishment Sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences. 2013;54(2):202–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.08.039
  24. Krupić D. High BAS and Low BIS in Overconfi and Their Impact on Motivation and Self-Effi after Feedback. Primenjena psihologiya. 2017;10(3):297–312. doi: https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2017.3.297-312
  25. Kimbrel N.A., Nelson-Gray R.O., Mitchell J.T. BIS, BAS, and Bias: The Role of Personality and Cognitive Bias in Social Anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences. 2012;52(3):395–400. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2011.10.041
  26. Włodarska K.A., Zyskowska E., Terebus M.K., Rogoza R. The Dark Triad and BIS/BAS: A Meta-Analysis. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues. 2021;40(11):5349–5357. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00467-8
  27. Guo S., Lim L.S., Bentley P.J. Teams Frightened of Failure Fail More: Modelling Reward Sensitivity in Teamwork. In: 2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI). 2020. p. 109–116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI47803.2020.9308533
  28. Pourmohseni K.F. The Relation between Behavioral-Brain Systems Activity with Forgiveness and Marital Satisfaction in Couples. Contemporary Psychology. 2014;8(2):17–26. Available at: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=376430 (accessed 02.01.2022).
  29. House B.R. How Do Social Norms Influence Prosocial Development? Current Opinion in Psychology. 2018;20:87–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.011
  30. Kondo T. Some Notes on Rational Behavior, Normative Behavior, Moral Behavior, and Cooperation. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1990;34(3):495–530. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002790034003006
  31. Kislyakov P.A., Shmeleva E.A., Aleksandrovich M.O. Moral Grounds and Social Norms of Safe Prosocial Behaviour of Young People. The Education and Science Journal. 2020;22(10):116–138. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-10-116-138
  32. Krahé B., Möller I. Links between Self-Reported Media Violence Exposure and Teacher Ratings of Aggression and Prosocial Behavior among German Adolescents. Journal of Adolescence. 2011;34(2):279–287. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.05.003
  33. Jung J., Schröder-Abé M. Prosocial Behavior as a Protective Factor against Peers’ Acceptance of Aggression in the Development of Aggressive Behavior in Childhood and Adolescence. Journal of Adolescence. 2019;74(1):146–153. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.06.002
  34. Dymnicki A.B., Antônio T., Henry D.B. Levels and Growth of Specific and General Norms for Nonviolence among Middle School Students. Journal of Adolescence. 2011;34(5):965–976. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.11.012
  35. Maralov V.G., Sitarov V.A. The Development of a Diagnostic Questionnaire Revealing the Interaction Positions of Students Specialising in Psychological and Pedagogical Assistance. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2018;(1):167–177. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17805/zpu.2018.1.13
  36. Burlachuk L.F., Korolev D.K. [Adaptation of the Big Five Locator Scale]. Voprosy psikhologii. 2000;(1):126–134. Available at: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/707228/1/korolyov_lokator_bolshoy_pyatyerki.PDF (accessed 01.12.2021). (In Russ.)
  37. Carver C., White T. Behavioral Inhibition, Behavioral Activation, and Affective Responses to Impending Reward and Punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994;67(2):319–333. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319
  38. Knyazev G.G., Slobodskaya E.R., Savostyanov A.N., Ryabichenko T.I., Shushlebina O.A., Levin E.A. [Activation and Inhibition of Behavior as the Basis of Individual Differences]. Psychological Journal. 2004;25(4):28–40. (In Russ.)
  39. Vize C.E., Collison K.L., Miller J.D., Lynam D.R. Using Bayesian Methods to Update and Expand the Meta-Analytic Evidence of the Five-Factor Model’s Relation to Antisocial Behavior. Clinical Psychology Review. 2019;67:61–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.09.001
  40. Cavarra M., Canegallo V., Santoddì E., Broccoli E., Fabio R. A. Peace and Personality: The Relationship between the Five-Factor Model’s Personality Traits and the Peace Attitude Scale. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 2021;27(3):508–511. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000484
  41. Sarkar A., Garg N. A Multilevel Model Exploring the Relationships between Individual Spirituality, Spiritual Climate, and Nonviolent Work Behavior. Conflict Resolution Quarterly. 2021;38(3):209–229. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21298

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2022 Maralov V.G., Kudaka M.A., Smirnova O.V., Sitarov V.A., Koryagina I.I., Romanyuk L.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Founded in 1996
Registry Entry: PI № FS 77-70142 of June 16, 2017

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».