Students ‘view on distance education
- Authors: Maksimyuk E.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Siberian State Road University
- Issue: Vol 18, No 3 (2021)
- Pages: 157-170
- Section: Educational psychology
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1991-8569/article/view/70606
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-pps.2021.3.11
- ID: 70606
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The paper analyzes the results of an associative experiment conducted with second-year students (SibADI, Omsk) in the fall of 2020 with the aim of assessing the experience of the mass introduction of distance learning technologies, assessing the receptive reactions of students, identifying the degree of emotional comfort of learning during a pandemic, the difficulties they had to be faced, their sources and the degree of recurrence. The results of the study became the basis for the development of methodological recommendations in order to increase the degree of effectiveness of the educational process in a distance format.
The introduction reveals the essence of the concept of distance education, its goals and objectives at different stages in different countries. A number of advantages provided by the distance learning format and its relevance in the modern world are highlighted.
The results of the experiment showed that not all students are psychologically ready for a sharp transition to distance learning. The wide public resonance aroused increased interest in researching the problems that have arisen in this educational sphere.
The associative experiment took place in two stages. The first question was aimed at identifying the preferences of the form of education of full-time students. The question was: «What form of education do you prefer full-time or distance learning?» The responses ratio was 70:30. Seventy percent of the surveyed respondents preferred full-time education, the rest — distance learning. In the second part, they were invited to take part in an associative experiment to reconstruct a fragment of the national linguistic picture of the world in a certain historical period. Through an associative experiment, we were able to identify and analyze the psychoemotional assessment of the components and their frequency within the modified concept of “distance education”; practical recommendations of a didactic nature were proposed for reducing negative connotations and removing psychological barriers in the process of distance learning.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Elena V. Maksimyuk
Siberian State Road University
Author for correspondence.
Email: Grechko_EV@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8442-9194
Cand. Philol. Sci., Associate Professor of Foreign Languages Department
Russian Federation, OmskReferences
- Teoriya i praktika distantsionnogo obucheniya [Theory and practice of distance learning]. pod red. Ye.S. Polat. Moscow: Akademiya Publ., 2004. 416 p.
- Polat Ye.S. Pedagogicheskiye tekhnologii distantsionnogo obucheniya [Distance learning pedagogical technologies]. Moscow: Akademiya Publ., 2006. 392p.
- Khusyainov T.M. Istoriya razvitiya i rasprostraneniya distantsionnogo obrazovaniya [History of the development and spread of distance education]. Pedagogika i prosveshcheniye. 2014. No. 4. Pp. 30−41.
- Zaychenko T.P. Invariantnaya organizatsionno-didakticheskaya sistema distantsionnogo obucheniya [ Invariant organizational-didactic system of distance learning]. St. Petersburg: Asterion Publ., 2004. 188 p.
- Ivanchenko D.A. Sistemnyy analiz distantsionnogo obucheniya [System analysis of distance learning]. Moscow: Soyuz Publ., 2005. 192 p.
- Bukovski S. Metodicheskiye priyemy i kompleks uprazhneniy kreativnogo obucheniya pri podgotovke k referirovaniyu inoyazychnykh tekstov v neyazykovom vuze [Methodological techniques and a set of creative learning exercises in preparation for abstracting foreign language texts in a non-linguistic university]. Pedagogika i psikhologiya obrazovaniya. 2020. No. 1. Pp. 45−58.
- Voronina D.K. K voprosu o metodologii integratsii nauchnykh distsiplin «Informatika» i «Angliyskiy yazyk» na osnove analiza trebovaniy FGOS [On the issue of interdisciplinary integration of educational disciplines «Informatics» and «English language» based on the analysis of the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard]. Pedagogika i psikhologiya obrazovaniya. 2020. No. 4. Pp. 81−90.
- Nuriyev N., Starygina S.D. Didakticheskaya inzheneriya kak metodika avtomatizirovannoy uchebnoy deyatel’nosti [Didactic engineering as a method of organizing automated educational activity]. Pedagogika i psikhologiya obrazovaniya. 2020. No. 2. Pp. 9−24.
- Sorokoumova Ye.A., Lobanova A.V. Issledovaniye struktury intellekta vzroslykh, obuchayushchikhsya v usloviyakh informatsionnogo prostranstva [Study of the structure of the intellect of adults studying in the information space]. Pedagogika i psikhologiya obrazovaniya. 2020. No. 4. Pp. 185−197.
- Korepanova N.V., Shuvalova N.V. Sovremennyye podkhody k povysheniyu kvalifikatsii prepodavateley vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy [Modern approaches to advanced training of teachers of higher educational institutions]. Pedagogika i psikhologiya obrazovaniya. 2020. No. 4. Pp. 132−138.
- Ag-Ahmad N. Open and Distance Learning (ODL): Preferences, Issues and Challenges amidst Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching (CPLT). 2020. Vol. 8. No. 2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350790153 (accessed June 21, 2021).
- Adnan M., Anwar K. Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students’ perspectives. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching. 2020. No. 2 (1). Рр. 2–8.
- Crawford J., Butler-Henderson K., Rudolph J., Glowatz M. COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching. 2020. No. 3(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7 (accessed June 22, 2021).
- Mailizar Almanthari A., Maulina S., Bruce S. Secondary school mathematics teachers’ views on e-learning implementation barriers during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2020. No. 16 (7). https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/8240 (accessed June 22, 2021).
- Zhong R. The Coronavirus Exposes Education’s Digital Divide. The New York Times. 2020. March 17. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/technology/china-schools-coronavirus.html%0Ahttps://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/technology/chinaschoolscoronavirus.html%0Afile:///C:/Users/Mathi/Desktop/Covid 19 Digital Divide/Digital Divide 6th May/The Coronavirus Exp. (accessed June 22, 2021).
- Ben-Amram Miri, Davidovitch Nitza. The COVID-19 Period: A Crisis for on-Site Learning or an Opportunity for Optimal Distance Learning? Examination of Student Attitudes Journal of Education and Learning. 2021. Vol. 10. No. 3. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education. Pp. 27–38.
- Reimers F.M., Schleicher A. A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020. OECD. 2021. March 15. https://globaled.gse.harvard.edu/files/geii/files/framework_guide_v1_002.pdf (accessed June 22, 2021).
- Armakolas Stefanos. Teleconference Sessions in Distance Learning Courses: The Influence of Psychological Factors. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design. 2021, April–June. Vol. 11. No. 2. Рp. 1–15.
- Misirli Ozge. Emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: Parents experiences and perspectives. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10520-4 (accessed June 30, 2021).
- Brooks S.K., Webster R.K., Smith L.E., Woodland L., Wessely S., Greenberg N., Rubin G.J. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet. 2020. No. 395 (10227). Рр. 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8 (accessed June 30, 2021).
- Dong C., Cao S., Li H. Young children’s online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Chinese parents’ beliefs and attitudes. Children and Youth Services Review. 2020. P. 118. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105440 (accessed June 30, 2021).
- Hodges C., Moore S., Lockee B., Trust T., Bond A. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Education Review. 2020. No. 27. Рр. 1–12. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/thediference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning (accessed June 30, 2021).
- Parczewska T. Difficult situations and ways of coping with them in the experiences of parents homeschooling their children during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland. Education. 2020. No. 3 (13). Рр. 1–12. https://doi. org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1812689 (accessed June 1, 2021).
- Trzcińska-Król M. Students with special educational needs in distance learning during the COVID19 pandemic – parents’ opinions. Interdisciplinary Context of Special Pedagogy. 2020. No. 29 (1). Pp. 173–191. https:// doi.org/10.14746/ikps.2020.29.08 (accessed June 11, 2021).
- Bozkurt A., Sharma R.C. Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education. 2020. No. 15 (1). i–vi. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083 (accessed June 12, 2021).
- Chang G.C., Satako Y. How are countries addressing the Covid-19 challenges in education? A snapshot of policy measures. World Education. 2020. https://www.gecv.ac.in/uploads/ssip/UNESCO%20snap%20shot%20for%20maintaining%20education.pdf (accessed June 12, 2021).
- Kanellopoulos A., Koutsouba M., Giosos I. Audiovisual learning and videoconferencing in distance education. Open Education. The Journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology. 2020. No. 16 (1). Рр. 44–63.
- Armakolas S., Panagiotakopoulos C. Distance learning through videoconferencing: the effects of technological factors. Open Education. The Journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology. 2020. No. 16 (1). Рр. 22–43.
- UNICEF and Microsoft launch global learning platform to help address COVID-19 education crisis. UNICEF. Retrieved October 15, 2020. https://www.unicef.org/ukraine/en/press-releases/ unicef-and-microsoft-launch-global-learning-platform-help-address-covid-19-education (accessed June 12, 2021).
- Maksimyuk Ye.V. Kognitivno-semanticheskoye modelirovaniye obrazovatel’nogo schast’ya v diskurse razlichnykh zhanrovykh realizatsiy [Cognitive-semantic modeling of images of happiness in the discourse of various genre realizations]. Omsk: SibADI, 2010. P. 5.
- Bakhtin M.M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki [Literature and aesthetics]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1975. Pp. 235–285.
- Tarasov Ye.F. Aktual’nyye problemy analiza yazykovogo soznaniya [Actual problems of the analysis of linguistic consciousness]. Yazyk soznaniya i struktura mira. Moscow: RAN, 2000. Pp. 24−33.
- Gavrilina M.V. Obrazy i struktura yazykovogo soznaniya [Images and structure of linguistic consciousness]. Yazykovoye soznaniye. Ustoyavsheyesya i spornoye: XIV mezhdunarodnyy simpozium po psikholingvistike i teorii kommunikatsii. Moscow, 2003. P. 55.
- Zalevskaya A.A. Natsional’no-kul’turnaya spetsifika kartiny mira i raznyye podkhody k yeye issledovaniyu [National and cultural specifics of the picture of the world and different approaches to its study]. Yazykovoye soznaniye i obraz mira. Moscow, 2000. Pр. 39−54.
- Leont’yev A.N. Psikhologiya obraza [The psychology of the image]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Ser. 14. Psikhologiya. 1979. No. 2. Pp. 3−13.
- Leont’yev D.A. Psikhologiya smysla: printsipy, dinamika i struktura smyslovoy real’nosti [Psychology of meaning: principles, dynamics and structure of meaningful reality]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 1999. 512 p.
- Pimenova M.V. O tipovykh strukturnykh elementakh kontseptov vnutrennego mira na primere kontsepta «dusha» [On typical structural elements of concepts of the inner world on the example of the concept of «soul»]. Yаzyk. Etnos, Kartina mira. Seriya: Kontseptual’nyye issledovaniya. Kemerovo: Grafika Publ., 2003. Pp. 28−39.
- Luriya A.R. Yаzyk i soznaniye [Language and consciousness]. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. Un-ta, 1979. 320 p.
- Frumkina R.M. Lingvist kak poznayushchaya lichnost’ [Linguist as a cognizing person]. Yаzyk i kognitivnaya deyatel’nost’. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1989. Pp. 38−46.
- Leont’yev A.A. Yаzyk i rechevaya deyatel’nost’ v obshchey i pedagogicheskoy psikhlogii [Language and speech activity in general and pedagogical psychology]. Moscow; Voronezh: MODEK Publ., 2001. 444 p.
- Zalevskaya A.A. Natsional’no-kul’turnaya spetsifika kartiny mira i raznyye podkhody k yeye issledovaniyu [National-cultural specificity of the picture of the world and different approaches to its study]. Yazykovoye soznaniye i obraz mira. Moscow, 2000. Pp. 39−54.
- Dotsenko T.I. O strukturnykh svyazyakh assotsiativno-verbal’noy seti [On the structural connections of the associative-verbal network]. Yаzykovoye soznaniye. Ustoyavsheyesya i spornoye. Moscow: RAN, 2003. P. 83.
Supplementary files
