The program relevance of future engineer creativity development on the basis of scientific research
- Authors: Ryndak V.G.1, Saifutdinova G.S.2
-
Affiliations:
- Orenburg State Pedagogical University
- West Kazakhstan Zhangir Khan University
- Issue: Vol 18, No 2 (2021)
- Pages: 113-121
- Section: Higher school education
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1991-8569/article/view/70445
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-pps.2021.2.9
- ID: 70445
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This paper contains answers to questions that show that the formation of creativity is vital for the future of the engineer, engineering education. At the same time, the authors explore how the creativity of future engineers should be formed in the process of studying at a technical university, and propose strategies to make creativity a part of every engineering curriculum and course. The paper presents the relevance of the program for the formation of the future engineer’s creativity based on the theoretical analysis of the world experience of domestic and foreign scientists. The possibilities and methods of its implementation in the process of scientific research are shown. The presented research is based on the theory of knowledge, the activity approach, the pedagogy of creativity and the methodology of scientific research. The best practices of foreign scientists in solving the problem of forming the creativity of future engineers are presented. The purpose of the study is to justify the need to create a program aimed at developing the creativity of future engineers.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Valentina G. Ryndak
Orenburg State Pedagogical University
Email: ped@bk.ru
Dr. Ped. Sci., Professor, Head of Pedagogy and Sociology Department. Orenburg State Pedagogical University, Orenburg, Russian Federation
Russian Federation, OrenburgGulmira S. Saifutdinova
West Kazakhstan Zhangir Khan University
Author for correspondence.
Email: 20051984@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7298-0912
SPIN-code: 7338-8690
Senior Lecture of General Technical Training Center. West Kazakhstan Zhangir Khan University, Uralsk, The Republic of Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan, UralskReferences
- Bugakova E.V., Miroshnikova D.V. Organizatsiya kreativnogo vzaimodeystviya v professional’nom samoopredelenii obuchayushchikhsya [Organization of creative interaction in the professional self-determination of students]. KANT. 2019. No. 2. Рр. 28–32.
- Bul’tseva M.A., Lebedeva N.M. Mezhkul’turnyye kontakty i kreativnost’: analiz zarubezhnykh podkhodov [Cross-cultural contacts and creativity: analysis of foreign approaches]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya. 2018. Vol. 4. Рр. 15–21.
- Liberman Ya.L. Issledovaniye kreativnosti studentov-pervokursnikov tekhnicheskogo vuza [Research of creativity of first-year students of a technical university]. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye v Rossii. 2015. No. 1. Рр. 128–136.
- Moroz V.V. Aksiologicheskiye osnovaniya razvitiya kreativnosti studentov universiteta: avtoref. diss. ... d-ra ped. nauk [Axiological foundations for the development of creativity of university students. Abstract of thesis dr. ped. sci.]. Orenburg, 2015. 44 p.
- Rozhik A.Yu. Kreativnaya sostavlyayushchaya inzhenernogo myshleniya: teoreticheskoye i eksperimental’noye issledovaniye [Creative Component of Engineering Thinking: Theoretical and Experimental Study]. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya «Obrazovaniye. Pedagogicheskiye nauki». 2018. Vol. 10. No. 2. Рp. 89–108.
- Zakharova O.A., Cherkesova L.V., Akishin B.A. Fenomen inzhenernogo myshleniya i rol’ sovremennogo tekhnicheskogo obrazovaniya v podgotovke inzhenera mirovogo urovnya [The phenomenon of engineering thinking and the role of modern technical education in the training of world-class engineers]. Mir obrazovaniya – obrazovaniye v mire. 2016. Vol. 3. No. 62. Рр. 77–81.
- Yakovleva T. Chelyabinsk prinyal XIV Forum mezhregional’nogo sotrudnichestva Rossii i Kazakhstana [Chelyabinsk hosted the XIV Forum of Interregional Cooperation between Russia and Kazakhstan]. http://chel. mk.ru/articles/2017/11/15 (accessed April 21, 2021).
- Bernhard J. Learning Through Design-Implement Experiences: A Literature Review. In Work-in-progress presented at the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland, 2016. June 12–16.
- Bosman L., Fernhaber S. Applying Authentic Learning Through Cultivation of the Entrepreneurial Mindset in the Engineering Classroom. Education Sciences. 2016. Vol. 1. No. 7.
- Lucas В., Hanson J. Thinking Like an Engineer: Using Engineering Habits of Mind and Signature Pedagogies to Redesign Engineering. IJEP. 2016. Vol. 6. iss. 2. Pр. 4–13.
- Tranquillo J. The T-Shaped Engineer. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations. 2017. Vol. 30. No. 4. Рр. 12–24.
- Dunne C. Can Intercultural Experiences Foster Creativity? The Relevance, Theory and Evidence. Journal of Intercultural Studies. 2017. Vol. 38. No. 2. Рр. 189–212.
- Wheadon J., Duval-Couetil N. Elements of Entrepreneurially Minded Learning: KEEN White Paper. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship. 2017. Vol. 7. Рр. 17–25.
- Marquis A. Present Absence: Undergraduate Course Outlines and the Development of Student Creativity Across Disciplines. Teaching in Higher Education. 2017. Vol. 22. No. 2. Рр. 222–238.
- Steghöfer J. Teaching Agile: Addressing the Conflict Between Project Delivery and Application of Agile Methods. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion. 2016. Рр. 303–312.
- Mariana Leandro Cruz, Gillian N. Saunders-Smits & Pim Groen European Journal of Engineering Education. 2020. Vol. 45. Issue 5. Published Online: 25 Sep. 2019.
- Rotenberg V.S. Khod mysli. Pro to, kak rozhdayutsya idei [The course of thought. About how ideas are born]. Publishing solutions Publ., 2018. 48 p.
- Rae D., Melton D.E. Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset in US Engineering Education: an International View of the KEEN Project. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship. 2017.
- Rozhik A.Yu. Creative Component of Engineering Thinking: Theoretical and Experimental Study. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Education. Educational Sciences. 2018. Vol. 10. No. 2. Рр. 89–108.
- Cheville R.A. Hidden constraints in the design of liberal studies in engineering. Eng. Studies. 2015. Vol. 7. Рр. 147–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2015.1062487 (accessed March 21, 2021).
- McCants A.E.C. The liberal studies curriculum as the basis for an engineering education. Eng. Studies. 2015. Vol. 7. Рр. 145–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2015.1105411 (accessed March 2, 2021).
- Torrance E.P. Edukation and creative potential. Minneapolis, 1963.
- Plsek P.E. Creativity, innovation, and quality. Asqc: Milwaukee, Wi., 1997.
- Boden M.A. Dimensions of creativity. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass. London. 1994.
- Guilford J.P. A Revised Structure of Intellect. Studies of aptitudes of high-level personnel. 1957.
Supplementary files
