Coping behavior in diadic relations for partners with normative and disturbed development


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The study of the category of persons with impaired health is currently not sufficiently complete from a scientific point of view, but very significant from a social point of view. The article presents the results of a theoretical and empirical study of the coping behavior of individual and group subjects, namely dyads of partners of different health status: couples, including a partner with normative and impaired development; couples including both partners with developmental disabilities; couples consisting of normatively developing partners. The purpose of the study is a comprehensive analysis of the system of coping efforts in the dyad of partners in close relationships. The presence of a disease in one or both partners in a dyad is understood by us as stress, moreover, chronic, since we consider the status of disability in adults. At the same time, stress has the characteristics of both external and internal. Following foreign scientists, we believe that the disease represents general stress and is accompanied by specific functions, since the focus is on the physical illness of one partner, which adds dynamics to dyadic stress and the process of overcoming. We made an attempt to systematize the situation of the joint efforts of partners in tandem with impaired health. An analysis was made of the severity of individual and dyadic coping strategies in pairs of different groups, and a picture was analyzed of the correlation of the studied parameters with aspects of the quality of life, adaptation and cohesion of dyads, as well as the presence of health problems. A regression analysis of the impact of disability status on the complex of indicators studied was carried out. Thus, the specificity of coping behavior in dyads with different health status of partners is highlighted.

About the authors

Natalya S. Shipova

Kostroma State University

Email: ronia_777@mail.ru
Cand. Psych. Sci., Associate Professor of Special Pedagogy and Psychology Department. 17, Dzerzhinsky st., Kostroma, 156000, Russian Federation

References

  1. Королева Е.М., Крюкова Т.Л., Екимчик О.А. Диадический копинг и положительная динамика партнерских отношений на начальном этапе // Вестник Костромского государственного университета им. Н.А. Некрасова. Серия: Педагогика. Психология. Социальная работа. Ювенология. Социокинетика. - 2016. - Т. 22. - № 3. - С. 116-121.
  2. Куфтяк Е.В. Концепция семейного совладания: основные положения // Медицинская психология в России: электрон. науч. журн. - 2012. - № 5 (16) [Электронный ресурс]. - Режим доступа: medpsy.ru (дата обращения: 13. 03. 2019).
  3. Савенышева С.С. Стрессоры повседневной жизни и семейное функционирование: анализ зарубежных исследований // Интернет-журнал «Мир науки». - 2016. - Т. 4, № 6 [Электронный ресурс]. - Режим доступа: http://mir- nauki.com/PDF/28PSMN616.pdf (доступ свободный). Загл. с экрана. Яз. рус., англ.
  4. Bodenmann G. A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 1995. No. 54. 34-49 рр.
  5. Bodenmann G., Ledermann T., Bradbury T. Stress, sex, and satisfaction in marriage. Personal relationship, 2007. No. 14. 551-569 рр.
  6. Falconier M., Nussbeck F., Bodenmann G., Schneider H. and Bradbury T. Stress from daily hassles in couples: its effects on intradyadic stress, relationship satisfaction, and physical and psychological well-being. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 2015. No. 41. 221-235 рр.
  7. Hatfield E., Hatfield C., Cacioppo J.T., Rapson R.L. Emotional Contagion. Cambridge University Press, 1994. 240 р.
  8. Karney B.R., Bradbury T.N. The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: a review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 1995. No. 118. 3-34 рр.
  9. Ledermann T., Bodenmann G., Rudaz M., Bradbury T.N. Stress, communication, and marital quality. Family Relations, 2010. No. 59. 195-206 рр.
  10. Manne S.L., Glassman M. Perceived control, coping efficacy, and avoidance coping as mediators between spouse unsupportive behaviors and cancer patients’ psychological distress. Health Psychology, 2000. No. 19. 155-164 рр.
  11. Norton T.R., Manne S.L., Rubin S., Hernandez E., Carlson J., Bergman C., et al. Ovarian cancer patients’ psychological distress: The role of physicalimpairment, perceived unsupportive family and friend behaviors, perceived control, and selfesteem. Health Psychology, 2005. No. 24. 143-152 рр.
  12. Revenson T.A., DeLongis A. Couples coping with chronic illness. In S. Folkman (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Coping and Health (pp. 101-123). New York, Oxford Press, 2010.
  13. Rohrbaugh M., Shoham V., Coyne J.C., Cranford J.A., Sonnega J.S., Nicklas J.M. Beyond the “self” in self-efficacy: Spouse confidence predicts patientsurvival following heart failure. Journal of Family Psychology, 2004. No. 18. 184-193 рр.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2020 Shipova N.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).